Psychological and Communication Processes Associated With Intergroup Conflict Resolution (original) (raw)
Related papers
Struggles for cooperation: conflict resolution strategies in multicultural groups
Journal of Managerial Psychology, 2010
Purpose -The aim of this paper is to examine the influence of group composition in cultural values on conflict management styles in groups. Design/methodology/approach -A field study using data from 125 groups was conducted. Findings -The results show that in groups where members feel they are equal and connected (horizontal collectivism) cooperation is better, and contending and avoiding conflict management styles are used less. When people view themselves as unequal and independent (vertical individualism (VI)) the avoiding style of conflict management is more frequently used. Within-group similarity (low variety) in VI leads to more cooperation and less avoidant conflict management strategies as well as less third party interventions. High group variety in views of being unequal, but interconnected (vertical collectivism), as well as in the views of being equal but independent (horizontal individualism), leads to more cooperative conflict resolution strategy. Practical implications -The results show that small and consistent within-group differences in cultural values are beneficial (with the exception of VI) for cooperative strategies. By showing that group compositional configurations in cultural values (vertical/horizontal individualism and collectivism) impact on conflict management strategies, the study has important implications for team design. Originality/value -The paper extends current research by conceptualizing cultural values (it considers the horizontal vs vertical orientation in individualism-collectivism) as configural group properties and by testing the impact of specific team configurations in cultural values on conflict management strategies.
Cooperation and Conflict within Groups: Bridging Intragroup and Intergroup Processes
Journal of Social Issues, 2009
Whereas intragroup processes and intergroup relations are often assumed to reflect discrete processes and cooperation and conflict to represent alternative outcomes, the present article focuses on intergroup dynamics within a shared group identity and challenges traditional views of cooperation and conflict primarily as the respective positive and negative outcomes of these dynamics. Drawing on the ideas, theories, and evidence presented in other articles in this volume, we (1) consider the dynamic tension between stability and change that exists within hierarchical groups; (2) discuss the different perspectives that advantaged and disadvantaged subgroups within a larger group have regarding this tension; (3) propose that cooperation and conflict should be viewed as developmental processes in the life of a group; (4) suggest that constructive resolution of conflict depends upon whether subgroups manage to satisfy the different needs of each group, and (5) conclude by discussing the personal, social, and policy implications of this perspective.
M5_A1: Reducing Intergroup Conflict Amber Bruner PSY 310 Section A03
While acting as a counselor in a detention center for delinquent adolescent boys, most of them were active in local gangs. The theoretical counseling position has been tasked with devising a plan to reduce the recently escalated intergroup conflicts between the boys. Clarity of what intergroup conflict is determined as will be provided. I will present insight to the concepts the lead to intergroup conflicts by examining negative attitudes and/or behaviors. A detailed overview of stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination is offered. As well as the different strategies that could reduce intergroup conflict that were mentioned in the textbook and the intergroup bias article. Also, I will evaluate two concepts that could aid in overcoming negative attitudes and behaviors learned during this course. In addition, a proposal of activities and/or programs utilized in detention centers that promotes positive behavior, team work, respect for others and reduce intergroup conflicts will be discussed.
Intergroup Relation-Based Conflict Resolution Patterns to Junior High School Students
Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran
Conflicts between junior high school students cannot be underestimated or left unchecked so that it drags on and causes ongoing conflicts if a settlement pattern and root cause are not found immediately. This study aims to analyze the pattern of intergroup relation-based conflict resolution carried out by junior high school students. This article is the result of research conducted using the development (R&D) method with the stages of needs analysis, development, and testing. The data collection method was carried out by distributing questionnaires to public junior high schools randomly consisting of 799 respondents, namely 329 male and 470 female. Data processing is done by grouping student answers based on research indicators in order to obtain a conflict resolution model used by students. The results showed that the pattern of intergroup relation-based conflict resolution carried out by junior high school students and equivalent in solving problems, students were more dominant in...
2010
Intergroup conflict represents one of the most pressing social problems of our time. The newspapers are filled with accounts of intergroup conflicts that greatly affect the people involved. The most constructive way of dealing with such conflict is through negotiation, which can be defined as a discussion between two or more parties aimed at resolving a perceived divergence of interests (Pruitt & Carnevale, 1993). Intergroup negotiations are typically conducted by representatives (Adams, 1976;
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
The 20th anniversary of Group Processes & Intergroup Relations offers an opportunity to reflect on progress in research. We describe the changing context of research and the scope and progress in the field. This special issue includes reviews by distinguished scholars in the areas of social identity, ideology, crowds, intergroup contact, crossed and multiple social categorization, communication, majority–minority conflict, group-based emotion, group decision making, group performance, ostracism, and social-cognitive development. Achievements and current knowledge in all of these areas are raising significant new questions, challenges, and opportunities for future research, strongly demonstrating the growing scientific strength and societal relevance of research in group processes and intergroup relations.