P263 Implementing A New Standard For Medical Specialty Society Guideline Development (original) (raw)
Related papers
Clinical guidelines development and implementation; barriers to acceptance and execution
The value of clinical guidelines and decision support tools are yet to be realized, due to a roadblock in its implementation that arises from both lack of understanding user needs, as well as a discrepancy of trust and transparency in its development process. With greater insight to understanding the organizational behaviors that are involved at each step of the process, from development to implementation, adoption to execution, heightened use and benefit from standardized care through guidelines can be evaluated. Beginning to enforce a more rigorous regulation and monitoring of guidelines development will attract more clinical utility. Standardized use of clinical guidelines will enhance care quality, eliminate discrepancies in treatment, and reduce variability across the health care system.
PLoS ONE, 2012
Objectives: We conducted a comparative review of clinical practice guideline development handbooks. We aimed to identify the main guideline development tasks, assign weights to the importance of each task using expert opinions and identify the handbooks that provided a comprehensive coverage of the tasks. Methods: We systematically searched and included handbooks published (in English language) by national, international or professional bodies responsible for evidenced-based guideline development. We reviewed the handbooks to identify the main guideline development tasks and scored each handbook for each task from 0 (the handbook did not mention the task) to 2 (the task suitably addressed and explained), and calculated a weighted score for each handbook. The tasks included in over 75% of the handbooks were considered as 'necessary' tasks. Result: Nineteen guideline development handbooks and twenty seven main tasks were identified. The guideline handbooks' weighted scores ranged from 100 to 220. Four handbooks scored over 80% of the maximum possible score, developed by the
Approaches to clinical guideline development in healthcare: a scoping review and document analysis
BMC Health Services Research
Background Over the past decade, an industry has emerged around Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) development in healthcare, which has increased pressure on guideline-producing organisations to develop CPGs at an accelerated rate. These are intended to improve the quality of care provided to patients while containing healthcare costs and reducing variability in clinical practice. However, this has inadvertently led to discrepancies in CPG recommendations between health organisations, also challenging healthcare providers who rely on these for decision-making and to inform clinical care. From a global perspective, although some countries have initiated national protocols regarding developing, appraising and implementing high-quality CPGs, there remains no standardised approach to any aspect of CPG production. Methods A scoping review of the literature and document analysis were conducted according to Joanna Brigg’s Institute methodology for scoping reviews. This comprised two qualita...
Trends in guideline implementation: an updated scoping review
Implementation Science
Background Guidelines aim to support evidence-informed practice but are inconsistently used without implementation strategies. Our prior scoping review revealed that guideline implementation interventions were not selected and tailored based on processes known to enhance guideline uptake and impact. The purpose of this study was to update the prior scoping review. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, CINAHL, Scopus, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for studies published from 2014 to January 2021 that evaluated guideline implementation interventions. We screened studies in triplicate and extracted data in duplicate. We reported study and intervention characteristics and studies that achieved impact with summary statistics. Results We included 118 studies that implemented guidelines on 16 clinical topics. With regard to implementation planning, 21% of studies referred to theories or frameworks, 50% pre-identified implementation barriers, and 36% engaged stakeholde...
Guideline.gov: A Database of Clinical Specialty Guidelines
Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 2017
The National Guidelines Clearinghouse (NGC), also known as Guideline.gov, is a database of resources to assist health care providers with a central depository of guidelines for clinical specialty areas in medicine. The database is provided free of charge and is sponsored by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The guidelines for treatment are updated regularly, with new guidelines replacing older guidelines every five years. There are hundreds of current guidelines with more added each week. The purpose and goal of NGC is to provide physicians, nurses, and other health care providers, insurance companies, and others in the field of health care with a unified database of the most current, detailed, relevant, and objective clinical practice guidelines.
Misconceptions, Challenges, Uncertainty, and Progress in Guideline Recommendations
Seminars in Hematology, 2008
Although the quality of clinical practice guidelines has improved over the last decade, current guideline systems have limitations that reduce their validity and limit their acceptance. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) working group, a worldwide collaboration of guideline developers, methodologists, and clinicians, has constructed a system for developing guidelines that addresses these shortcomings. The system includes a transparent and rigorous methodology for rating the quality of evidence, an explicit balancing of benefits and harms of healthcare interventions, an explicit acknowledgement of the values and preferences that underlie the recommendations, and whether the intervention represents a wise use of resources. These four elements determine whether a recommendation is strong or weak. A guideline panel offers strong recommendations when virtually all informed patients would choose the same management strategy. Weak recommendations imply that choices will differ across the range of patient values and preferences. The GRADE system has been tested in multiple practice settings and for a large spectrum of questions, refined and re-evaluated to ensure that it captures the complex issues involved in evidence assessment and grading recommendations while maintaining simplicity and practicality. Many guideline organizations and medical societies have endorsed the system and adopted it for their guideline processes. Semin Hematol 45:167-175
The updating of clinical practice guidelines: insights from an international survey
Implementation Science, 2011
Background: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have become increasingly popular, and the methodology to develop guidelines has evolved enormously. However, little attention has been given to the updating process, in contrast to the appraisal of the available literature. We conducted an international survey to identify current practices in CPG updating and explored the need to standardize and improve the methods.
A view into clinical practice guidelines: who uses them, who doesn’t and possibly, why
Qualitative research in medicine & healthcare, 2017
Medical professional societies each develop specific clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Based on the best available evidence, CPGs are intended to control variability and optimize quality of care in clinical practice. Yet, healthcare providers often do not accept or adhere to guidelines, but their reasons are not fully understood. When providers opt to choose not to follow CPGs, unfavorable patient outcomes including unequal access to treatment become negative consequences. In this small qualitative study, we will explore what causes non-adherence to CPGs and what changes have been made to CPGs from when physicians completed their medical residencies to the present. We interviewed physicians from a variety of medical specialties to assess how these changes may influence guideline adherence as well as the consequences of not following them. We found that guidelines may not be followed in cases where patients have comorbidities that are not described in the guidelines or when physicians do not incorporate new evidence and technology advances into their practice. In some specialties, physicians can develop a poor reputation if they do not adhere to the CPGs, and managed care agencies may deny reimbursement for care they provided. To best serve the physician and the patient, we need to find ways to improve CPG adherence. Tactics such as improving the methodology of CPG formation, using information technology, and creating ways to change physician attitudes and behavior are all viable options.
Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2014
Research CMAJ Background: Although several tools to evaluate the credibility of health care guidelines exist, guidance on practical steps for developing guidelines is lacking. We systematically compiled a comprehensive checklist of items linked to relevant resources and tools that guideline developers could consider, without the expectation that every guideline would address each item.