CHIPS-Child: Testing the developmental programming hypothesis in the offspring of the CHIPS trial (original) (raw)
Related papers
makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the "Content") contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content. This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic re...
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
2012
Page 1. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience 3 (2013) 61–71 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/dcn Review Majority influence in children and other animals Daniel BM Hauna,b,c,*, Edwin JC van Leeuwena, Micah G.
Commentary: An Integration of Neuroscience into the Study of Child Development
It seems to me that there are currently two new major trends in the research into child development. One trend is to push the frontier of research into even earlier stage of development. Younger babies' surprisingly advanced cognitive abilities become a focus of interest (Colombo, 2001; Dehaene-Lamber tz, Dehaene, & Her tz-Pannier, 2002; Fiser & Aslin, 2002; Saffran, Aslin, & Newport, 1996; Stager, & Werker, 1997). The second trend is to investigate the relations between children's cognitive and social development and their ...
An architecture for comparative cognitive development
American Journal of Primatology, 2003
We review Parker and McKinney's book with two distinct aims. Our first aim is to consider the contribution of this book to the current intellectual debate about the relations between evolution and behavioral development. In this instance, we are concerned especially with the particular domains of behavior considered by behavioral scientists to reflect ''intelligence'' or ''cognition.'' Our second aim is to critique how well the authors communicate the debate in this areaFspecifically, the presentation and interpretation of the data for a graduate seminar audience that is encountering comparative developmental scholarship for the first time. This book was written by an interdisciplinary team. S. Parker (an anthropologist) uses the Piagetian framework to understand cognitive development in nonhuman primates. M. McKinney (an evolutionary biologist) is concerned with the relation between development and evolution in a more general sense, and has a particular interest in the evolution of the nervous system. The team is eminently qualified to produce a provocative integration of contemporary scholarship in this area. Parker wrote 10 chapters (all of part I, a substantive review of cognitive development in monkeys, apes, and humans; and three of the six chapters in part II, dealing with the evolution of cognitive development). McKinney wrote the opening and closing chapters in part II, and the two authors co-wrote one other chapter in part II. The book begins with an historical overview of how the current interest in comparative development arose. We found this way of opening the subject valuable, although one could quibble with some of the characterizations. Methodological issues are also treated in a useful way for those unfamiliar with this area. Following these introductory matters, Parker competently reviews what data there are (and in fact there are not many) on cognitive development in nonhuman primates as assessed by Piagetian instruments. Development is divided into physical, logico-mathematical, and social domains, with an additional chapter on the development of language. Two strengths of Parker's reviews are a broad conception of the relation between social setting and behavioral development, and the consideration of cognitive development in as broad an array of contexts and tasks, and with as many measurement instruments as possible (with the proviso that she considers only those studies that are conceived and presented
The Effects of Developmental Programming upon Neonatal Mortality
Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice
• Authors can share their preprint anywhere at any time. • If accepted for publication, we encourage authors to link from the preprint to their formal publication via its Digital Object Identifier (DOI). Millions of researchers have access to the formal publications on ScienceDirect, and so links will help your users to find, access, cite, and use the best available version. • Authors can update their preprints on arXiv or RePEc with their accepted manuscript .