Corporate Social Responsibility and Public Relations: Do Any Clear Distinctions Remain? An Examination of 50 Companies in Thailand (original) (raw)
Related papers
Differences between public relations and corporate social responsibility: An analysis
Public Relations Review, 2000
This article compares corporate social responsibility and corporate public relations by reviewing their origins, theories, processes, and primary responsibilities and found them to be quite similar in these respects. By comparing the two disciplines, theorists and practitioners can gain greater insight into each field.
Examining Corporate Social Responsibility as a Public Relations Vehicle: An Empirical Study
Int. J. Corporate Strategy and Social Responsibility, 2017
The purpose of this study was to examine the perceptions of public relations and marketing managers and administrators on corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices and strategy in the service industry in Europe for twenty-five firms. The research is qualitative in nature, and aims to investigate how social initiatives focused on the CSR strategy of a company are perceived, positioned, and deployed to maximize, simultaneously, internal benefits (i.e. financial performance) and external benefits to society (including a firm’s stakeholders), discussing also directions for future studies in the area of CSR in Europe.
Public relations and corporate social responsibility: Some issues arising
Journal of Business Ethics, 1994
The paper questions current assumptions about the benefits of corporate social responsibility and the claims that corporations make on behalf of their corporate social responsibility programmes. In particular, the paper suggests that the use of corporate social responsibility for public relations ends raises moral problems over the motivation of corporations. The paper cautions that the justifications which corporations employ may either be immoral or inaccurate with regard to the empirical evidence gained from a small-scale qualitative study carried out i, the UK at a time when the practice of corporate social responsibility was expanding quickly (1989). It is noticeable, in retrospect, that great emphasis is placed upon environmental rather than social responsibility. This implies that organisations are primarily reactive in their development of corporate social responsibility" programmes and that they respond to external pressures rather than working out the nature of their corporate responsibilities. It might suggest that corporations only take such actions when they feel compelled to do so by consumerist and environmentalist lobbies. The paper argues that corporations do need to find moral justifications for their moral activities and to ensure that corporate social responsibility practice lives up to the claims made by public relations practitioners. The paper explores the nature of public relations and illustrates how its responsibility for corporate social responsibility extends beyond truthfulness in publicity.
Public relations and CSR review
This study analyses trends and patterns in public relations literature about Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) through a content analysis of articles published between 1998 and 2007. The current status of the literature suggests that public relations scholars have broadened their approach to CSR from one solely encompassing communication management, as proposed by Clark , to one that incorporates the management function and relationship management components of contemporary public relations thinking. The findings of the literature review suggest that there are opportunities for social responsibility to be incorporated into public relations through a process approach, which would foster stronger links between organizations, stakeholders and society.
The analysis of public relations role in improving corporate social responsibility
Journal of Engineering Management and Competitiveness, 2016
The main objective of modern business is achievement of business excellence and world-class of products and services. Companies which actively and continuously apply modern management methods and techniques, especially in marketing, have significantly better chance to strengthen their competitive capability on global market and to assume stable market position with perspective for further market development. Modern business philosophy implies that organization has to be responsible for its actions and steps towards all stakeholders in the environment. Attaining of business excellence goals of an organization presupposes built corporate social responsibility. The research results presented in this paper were used to analyze the possibilities of using modern methods and techniques of public relations in business organizations and improve corporate social responsibility on the market of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Analysis of Media Coverage of Thailand’s Top 15 Listed Companies’ CSR Activities
2019
This research examines and studies the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) Listed Companies’ Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives and their media coverage in Thailand’s most popular English newspaper. The study included an extensive content analysis of the top 15 listed companies’ Corporate Social Responsibility reports, as well as further data collection from the news archives of the Bangkok Post. The extensive analysis has demonstrated that the largest English Thai media outlet generally showed a strong interest in publishing articles about the companies’ CSR. This was reflected in a high number of articles mentioning the companies’ names. The majority of CSR initiatives focused on the social component of the Triple Bottom Line with the promotion of fair labour practices, decent work, and human rights or education. These foci were reflected in the media coverage. Keywords: Corporate Social Responsibility; Stock Exchange of Thailand; Media Coverage; Content Analysis.
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AS AN INVENTION OF PUBLIC RELATIONS
JOURNAL OF MEDIA AND COMMUNICATION STUDIES http://www.academicjournals.org/JMCS, 2013
which is modern PR is guided by reciprocity between the corporations and their publics in an effort to create mutual understanding and goodwill between corporations and their publics. The study is based on two corporations namely, Econet and NRZ, whose business is immensely influenced by PR and CSR programs, which operate as effective communication strategies with their stakeholders for organisational success. PR is the core of the two corporations in Zimbabwe, essentially suitable for creating corporate citizenship to maximise profit. The study would be informed by four theories namely Carroll's model of CSR, two-way symmetrical models, open systems approach and public opinion. Further, the study applies triangulation through the use of both qualitative and quantitative research methods to obtain information for reality and validity purposes. There is a vast need, to trace PR activities in CSR, from the initial planning stage, to determine whether these activities tally well with the corporate goals and objectivities, in serving the public, in a bid to create mutual understanding with the corporation. In this context, the question often asked on whether CSR programs are more than just a mere manoeuvre through which companies aim to acquire a positive public image, beat competition and run high, can be contested. We argue that CSR can be considered to be a new solution identified by the PR department, to improve the image of the organisation by appealing to the sentimental side of the public, in solving social problems. In Zimbabwe, the PR departments at Econet and NRZ, initiate and execute duties similar to what was observed by Clark (2000). He argued that CSR like PR seeks to represent an opportunity of improving the efficacy of activity of the corporate world.
2002
This paper reports evidence from a field study in Australia aimed at testing a theoretical model of corporate social responsiveness that describes organizations enacting stakeholder relationships through their social responsibility orientation and their public relations orientation. The study demonstrates how an organizational orientation to social responsibility contributes to performance by using public relations, it its broadest sense, to reduce conflict with stakeholders.
International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 2016
The purpose of this research was to investigate the current implementation status of corporate social responsibility activities of a set of companies listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand. Specifically, we applied a multi-dimensional framework, which developed from the evolution of Porter and Kramer's thought on the relationship between business and society, to analyze the types of corporate social responsibility activities and to explore the issues addressed. The research adopted qualitative and quantitative document analysis on sustainability reports from a sample of 20 listed companies which were the winners of Thailand Corporate Social Responsibility Awards in 2014. The findings revealed that the implementation of corporate social responsibility activities was based on generic issues and value chain social impacts rather than social needs. In addition, the types of corporate social responsibility activities were philanthropy and responsive CSR rather than strategic philanthropy, strategic CSR and CSV. Therefore, companies should shift towards strategic CSR and CSV which related to the strategy and operations of any specific company or the places in which they operate because they can be a source of opportunity, innovation, and competitive advantage. Then, an important next step should be to study how to motivate CSV practices and how to transform the corporate social responsibility activities of companies from CSR to CSV.