Productivity Growth Rates in Europe and the USA: A Tale of Convergence in the 21st Century (original) (raw)
Related papers
European Productivity Growth Since 2000 and Future Prospects
2015
This article revisits the issue of Europe's growth slowdown, taking into account the latest experiences from the recession and the debt crisis since 2008. There are few, if any, signs of even the beginnings of a reversal in the slowing growth trend, which is primarily driven by the weak productivity performance in most European countries. Recently, slow productivity growth has broadened from the services sector to the goods sector for most European economies. Output growth projections out to 2025 show a deceleration in Europe’s growth trend compared to the pre-recession period, and even compared to the latest period, 2006-2012, there are no signs of significant acceleration in the growth trend. Demographic structures and continued slow total factor productivity growth are both dampening trend output growth, although there will be large variation between different EU economies. RÉSUMÉ Le présent article revient sur la question du ralentissement de la croissance de la productivit...
Productivity Growth in Europe and the US: a Sectoral Study
Review of Economics and Institutions, 2010
This paper describes recent trends in productivity growth in the EU and the US. By adopting a sectoral perspective, we achieve a deeper understanding of the compositional patterns of aggregate growth and shed light on the reasons why the EU productivity has lagged behind the US during the period 1995-2007. This may be of use for policy makers in order to design policies to close the gap. Whilst our findings indicate that performance in manufacturing sectors of many EU countries has been strong, we observe notable disadvantages in relation to productivity performance of key market service sectors. Restrictions in product and labour markets prevailing in many EU countries have been put forward as potential factors causing poor productivity; research shows that these can have particular harmful effects in services sectors given their large size and inter-linkages to other sector of the economy.
Productivity and Economic Growth in Europe: A Comparative Industry Perspective
International Productivity Monitor, 2011
Why did European productivity growth slow down while American growth accelerated since the 1990s? In this article we provide a detailed analysis of the sources of growth from a comparative industry perspective, based on our recent book Economic Growth in Europe. We argue that Europe's falling behind is the combined result of a severe productivity slowdown in traditional manufacturing and other goods production, and a concomitant failure to invest in and reap the benefits from Information and Communications Technology (ICT), in particular in market services. The analysis is based on an update of the EU KLEMS growth accounting database and introduces a new measure for patterns of growth. Comment expliquer la concomitance depuis les années 1990 d'un ralentissement de la croissance en Europe et d'une accélération de la croissance américaine? Dans cette étude, nous nous sommes attachés à faire une analyse détaillée des sources de croissance en comparant les secteurs industriels et en nous appuyant sur notre dernier ouvrage Economic Growth in Europe. Nous soutenons que la perte de terrain de l'Europe est due aussi bien à un ralentissement brutal de la productivité dans les secteurs de la production de biens et de l'industrie manufacturière traditionnelle que de l'échec concomitant à investir dans le secteur des technologies de l'information et de la communication (TIC) et d'en récolter des bénéfices, plus particulièrement pour ce qui a trait aux services du marché. Nos recherches se fondent sur des données provenant de la base de données comptable sur la croissance «EU KLEMS» et proposent un nouvel indicateur pour mesurer le profil de croissance.
The Productivity Gap between Europe and the United States: Trends and Causes
Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2008
Since the mid-1990s, labor productivity growth in Europe has significantly slowed compared to earlier decades. In contrast, labor productivity growth in the United States accelerated, so that a new productivity gap has opened up. This paper shows that this development is attributable to the slower emergence of the knowledge economy in Europe. We consider various explanations which are not mutually exclusive. These include lower growth contributions from investment in information and communication technology; the small share of information and communications technology–producing industries in Europe; and slower multifactor productivity growth, which proxies for advances in technology and innovation. Underlying these are issues related to the functioning of European labor markets and the high level of product market regulation in Europe. The paper emphasizes the key role of market service sectors in accounting for the productivity growth divergence between the two regions. We argue th...
2002
This paper provides an overview of the currently available evidence on the importance of information and communication technologies (ICT) for developments in productivity growth in the euro area. On the basis of the available data, there is evidence of an increased contribution of ICT to economic growth both in terms of production and investment in the second half of the 1990s. However, there is little, if any, evidence of significant positive spillover effects from the use of ICT to overall productivity growth. This implies that there is no reason to believe that potential output growth in the euro area has increased significantly in recent years on account of new technologies. JEL classification: E22, L63, L86, O3, O47
Productivity, innovation and ICT in Old and New Europe
International Economics and Economic Policy, 2004
This paper investigates the productivity performance of CEE countries vis-à-vis the EU-15 during the 1990s to detect sources of convergence between the two regions. The paper shows that changes in labour intensity have been an important source of productivity convergence during the 1990s, and are likely to remain so in the near future. It is also found that despite lower income levels, ICT capital in the CEE-10 has contributed as much to labour productivity growth as in the EU-15. Industry analysis shows that manufacturing industries that have invested heavily in ICT have been key to the restructuring process. As such ICT may therefore have been an important but probably temporary source of convergence. In the longer run the impact of ICT on growth will have to come primarily from its productive use in services. The paper therefore includes a New Economy Indicator that reflects the existence of conducive environment for continued ICT investment and diffusion. It shows that further reforms are much needed for CEE countries to enter a second convergence phase in the coming decades.
Catching up or getting stuck? Europe's troubles to exploit ICT's productivity potential
2006
In this paper we extend our previous analysis of the comparative productivity performance of Europe and the U.S. to 2004, thereby covering the latest full business cycle. Our main finding is that the slower contribution of ICT to productivity growth in the EU compared to the U.S. has persisted into the early part of the 21st century. The growth differential even increased since 2000, as the U.S. shows strong labour productivity advances in market services. This may be related to a more productive use of ICT in the U.S.. However, at industry level we find no support for significant TFP (total factor productivity) spillovers from ICT investment, neither in the U.S. nor in European countries. In the 1980s we even find that ICT investment and TFP growth are negatively related, with at best normal returns in the 1970s and 1990s. We speculate that this U-shaped pattern is driven by "hard savings" from ICT investment that first lead to earning normal returns, followed by a period of experimentation during which ICT and TFP growth are negatively related. Ultimately, "soft savings" lead to productivity gains from ICT in line with the marginal cost of ICT. We argue that the realization of productivity effects from soft savings is highly dependent on the competitive process that stimulates complementary innovations and weeds out inefficient users of ICT technology. Europe risks getting stuck in an environment where the productivity gains from soft savings from ICT remain unrealized. 2 The trend growth in productivity for both the U.S. and the EU-15 was estimated using historical annual data from 1979-2004. The Hodrick-Prescott (1997) filter we employ separates the cyclical effects from the long-term, or structural, component of productivity growth. Business cycles in the U.S. and the EU are not completed synchronised but the divergent trend growth rates are clear. Note that the trend estimates for especially the final two years are less reliable than for earlier years.