The killing of Jean Charles de Menezes: risk, the 'innocent', and looking guilty (original) (raw)

2008

Abstract

These arguments depart from the traditions of 'innocent until proven guilty', 'beyond reasonable doubt', 'trial by one's peers', that make up the UK's common sense notion of criminal justice. At no point did de Menezes have the chance to show that he was not a suicide bomber; he was never asked who he was, what he was doing and why.

Gavin Bailey hasn't uploaded this paper.

Let Gavin know you want this paper to be uploaded.

Ask for this paper to be uploaded.