Comparison of Guided and Unguided Ocriplasmin Injection for the Treatment of Vitreomacular Traction: A Preliminary Study (original) (raw)

A retrospective study of a single practice use of ocriplasmin in the treatment of vitreomacular traction

Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society, 2014

To evaluate success with intravitreal injection of ocriplasmin in releasing symptomatic vitreomacular traction (VMT). A retrospective review of consecutive series of patients in a single vitreoretinal practice. Patients with symptomatic distortion and loss of vision secondary to VMT were included in the study. Patients received a single injection of ocriplasmin (JETREA®) and were followed-up after 1 month with optical coherence tomography. Eight patients (8 eyes) were included (2 males and 6 females) in the study. Five of 8 eyes (62.5%) experienced complete release of the VMT; one of 8 eyes (12.5%) had partial release of VMT and two of 8 eyes (25%) did not have release of VMT. The two patients with no release of their VMT had the same vision. Of the 5 patients with complete release of VMT, 3 patients had a one line worsening of their vision, 1 had a 4 line improvement of vision, and 1 stayed the same. The patient with only partial release of their VMT had a 1 line worsening of visio...

Initial experience with ocriplasmin in the treatment of vitreomacular traction

Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia, 2016

This study aimed to report the clinical and structural outcomes of intravitreal ocriplasmin in the treatment of vitreomacular interface disorders in two tertiary centers in Brazil. A retrospective study was performed by reviewing medical records and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) findings of seven patients who were treated with a single ocriplasmin injection. A total of 57.14% of patients achieved resolution of vitreomacular traction as evidenced by SD-OCT. Regarding our functional results, 87.71% maintained or improved visual acuity after follow-up. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study reporting initial results of ocriplasmin therapy in Brazil.

Ocriplasmin in the treatment of vitreomacular traction - for

Acta Ophthalmologica, 2017

Aim: To investigate the efficacy of intravitreal injection of ocriplasmin (JETREA ®) in the treatment of vitreomacular traction (VMT). Materials and Methods: An 81-year-old man with VMT associated with central retinal vein occlusion in his left eye, was treated with a single intravitreal injection of ocriplasmin (25 μg). Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), ocular fundus, and optical coherence tomography were examined before and after treatment. Results: Complete release of VMT produced a reduction of central macular thickness, ranging from 459 to 141 μm. BCVA remained stable. Discussion and Conclusions: The use of ocriplasmin was effective in the treatment of VMT. Ocriplasmin represents a valid alternative to conventional pars plana vitrectomy.

Vitreomacular traction quantitative cutoffs for the assessment of resolution after ocriplasmin intravitreal treatment

Scientific Reports

This study aimed to assess optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters associated with vitreomacular traction (VMT) resolution after ocriplasmin intravitreal injection and also associated with the development of vitreomacular complications. Study designed was a retrospective case series. Structural OCT images were acquired at baseline and over the follow-up after treatment. We developed a mathematical model to provide quantitative parameters associated with VMT resolution. Moreover, we adopted the same model to assess the quantitative parameters associated with development of further vitreomacular complications or with the worsening of the coexisting condition. Main outcome measures were BCVA, central macular thickness (CMT), VMT reflectivity, VMT size, VMT resolution, epiretinal membrane (ERM), macular holes. 73 eyes of 73 VMT patients (mean age 73 ± 9 years) were recruited. The mean follow-up duration was 2.6 ± 1.1 years. Mean baseline BCVA was 0.38 ± 0.18 LogMAR, improving to 0...

Real-life experience after intravitreal ocriplasmin for vitreomacular traction and macular hole: a spectral-domain optical coherence tomography prospective study

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2015

Purpose To evaluate prospectively the anatomical and functional results after ocriplasmin injection in patients with vitreomacular traction (VMT), or macular hole (MH) combined with VMT, providing the real-life experience of three centers, using spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Methods Twenty-four patients with VMT (17 with VMT alone and 7 with an MH combined with VMT) were treated with a single ocriplasmin injection and followed-up prospectively at baseline, day 1, 7, 28 and the last examination of the follow-up for each patient (range: 30-127 days). Bestcorrected visual acuity (BCVA) and SD-OCT were performed for patient assessment, while various adverse events were recorded and analysed. At baseline, univariate analysis was also performed to examine the potential predictive factors for VMT release. Results 66.7 % of patients presented VMT release at the end of the follow-up, while 28.6 % exhibited MH closure.

Incomplete vitreomacular traction release using intravitreal ocriplasmin

Case reports in ophthalmology

To report the clinical course of our first 7 consecutive patients treated with intravitreal ocriplasmin (Jetrea(®)). Retrospective case series of the first 7 patients treated with ocriplasmin between January and December 2013 at an academic tertiary care center. The average age was 78.4 years (range: 63-92). Five patients were pseudophakic and 2 patients were phakic in the injected eye. The median baseline visual acuity (VA) was 20/60 (range: 20/25 to 20/200). The median 1-month postinjection VA was 20/70, with a mean loss of 2 lines of VA among all patients. None of the patients had complete resolution of their vitreomacular traction or macular hole at 1 month of follow-up. Three patients had subsequent pars plana vitrectomy and membrane peeling surgery. The mean follow-up period for those who did not undergo vitrectomy was 9 months (range: 1-13). One patient with known ocular hypertension had an increase in intraocular pressure requiring topical pressure-lowering eyedrops. There w...

Impact of Vitreoretinal Interface Architecture on Successful Vitreomacular Traction Resolution in Eyes Scheduled for Intravitreal Ocriplasmin Therapy

Retina, 2017

Purpose: To evaluate the impact of the vitreoretinal interface architecture, in specific the angle between the posterior vitreous cortex and the internal limiting membrane, on vitreomacular traction (VMT) resolution in eyes treated with intravitreally injected ocriplasmin (Jetrea). Methods: Retrospective, multicenter cohort study and exploratory data analysis. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography assessments were performed before scheduled ocriplasmin injections. General (age and sex) as well as ocular variables (lens status, presence of epiretinal membrane formations, horizontal diameter of VMT, central retinal thickness, and in particular various prespecified angles between the posterior vitreous cortex and internal limiting membrane) were analyzed to evaluate their impact on successful VMT resolution. Results: Fifty-nine eyes of 59 patients were included. Univariate analysis of age (odds ratio [OR]: 0.881; 95%

Association Between Anatomical Resolution and Functional Outcomes in the Mivi-Trust Studies Using Ocriplasmin to Treat Symptomatic Vitreomacular Adhesion/Vitreomacular Traction, Including When Associated with Macular Hole

Retina, 2015

To evaluate visual function in patients with symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion (VMA)/vitreomacular traction including when associated with macular hole after ocriplasmin treatment, and the association between resolution of the underlying condition and improvement in visual function. Methods: Six hundred and fifty-two patients from 2 Phase 3 trials received a single intravitreal injection of ocriplasmin 125 mg (n = 464) or placebo (n = 188). Mean and categorical changes from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity and 25-item Visual Function Questionnaire scores were used to evaluate visual function. Subgroups with VMA resolution and full-thickness macular hole closure were compared. Results: Overall, 42% of patients who achieved VMA resolution at Day 28 had a 2−lineimprovementinbest−correctedvisualacuityatMonth6,and202-line improvement in best-corrected visual acuity at Month 6, and 20% had a 2lineimprovementinbestcorrectedvisualacuityatMonth6,and203-line improvement. Likewise, 69% of patients with nonsurgical full-thickness macular hole closure at Day 28 had a 2−lineimprovementatMonth6,and482-line improvement at Month 6, and 48% had a 2lineimprovementatMonth6,and483-line best-corrected visual acuity improvement. Mean improvements in 25-item Visual Function Questionnaire scores were associated with achieving VMA resolution and nonsurgical full-thickness macular hole closure. Conclusion: In patients with symptomatic VMA/vitreomacular traction, VMA resolution and nonsurgical full-thickness macular hole closure were each associated with improvements in visual function. Resolving the underlying anatomical condition in symptomatic VMA/vitreomacular traction will increase the probability of achieving a clinically meaningful improvement in visual function.

Visual Function Response to Ocriplasmin for the Treatment of Vitreomacular Traction and Macular Hole: The OASIS Study

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2017

To assess the effect of ocriplasmin on visual function response (VFR) measured using visual acuity (VA) and vision-related quality of life, and to quantify the association between release of vitreomacular adhesion (VMA) at day 28 and VFR. Prespecified analysis of secondary endpoints from a randomized controlled trial. Of 220 participants with symptomatic VMA/vitreomacular traction (VMT), including VMT associated with a macular hole up to 400 μm, 146 received a single intravitreal injection of 125 μg ocriplasmin and 74 a sham injection. Based on principal components analysis results, a VFR was defined as either a VA improvement of ≥2 lines or an improvement exceeding the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the composite or the mental health subscale scores of the Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25). The MCID was estimated using the standard error of measurement approach. The main outcome measure was the VFR at month 6, with further assessments at months 12 and 24. Th...