The State, the Writer, and the Politics of Memory (original) (raw)

Reading History Against the State Secret

Angelaki, 2022

Abstract This paper reads Carlos Soto Román’s “Chile Project: [Re-classified],” a documentary poem that remediates declassified state documents as an ambivalent form of witnessing bureaucracy and state violence. Soto Román “re-classified” – that is, redacted – a forty-five-page selection of documents from the CIA dossier on Chile that was nominally declassified by the US Government in the wake of Augusto Pinochet’s military dictatorship. Soto Román’s intervention renders the documents almost entirely unreadable, a gesture which refuses to grant the archival records the status of official history. This gesture denies the witnessing contained in the documents while also witnessing the documents on behalf of a reader who cannot. In this unusual configuration of poem-as-witness, the paper argues, Soto Román instructs a reader elsewhere, to counter-histories of survival and resistance which are incommensurable with the version of history claimed by the US state. The paper further claims that the redaction can be read as an invitation to consider the “document” as a particular cultural object and media format in which history is written and unwritten, forged and contested, filled with noise and silence. To conclude, the paper posits that poetry, defined as a specific readerly approach to the conditions in which a text is made, provides a critical framework for considering the document as a dynamic interface and therefore history as an ongoing site for both domination and resistance.

On Silence and History

American Historical Review, 2021

How to write a silenced history is the broad question that frames this essay. It explores the methodological challenges of working with a purged archive and fragmented oral histories while telling the little-known story of the Bulgarian gulag and its aftermath. Weaving together the personal and the historical, the essay unfolds the silences that constitute the experience of state repression during the Communist era and the trauma that lingers to this day in the lives of survivors and society. To write a history of the Communist camp past in the capitalist present requires scholars to overcome intellectual frameworks deeply mired in triumphalist Cold War rhetoric. The historical methodology laid out here suggests that doing so demands of us to embrace the imperfect evidence that we have at our disposal: disjointed testimonies and purged documents. Instead of trying to make them cohere into a linear historical narrative, the essay proposes that we leave the gaps open and let the silences speak. In grappling with the limit of the archival record and faded memories, the essay also reflects on the multiplicity of the lived experience of twentieth-century Eastern European Communism and its contradicting realities, emancipatory and repressive at once.

[ARTIGO] Memory, narrative, and conflict in writing the past: when historians undergo ethical and political strains

História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography, 2020

In this paper I will analyze the distinctive features of the twentieth century historiography with regards to its most salient events. By doing so, I will provide an interpretation of the struggles which underlay the production of historical knowledge at the end of the century. In contrast to various theories of historiography which assert that autonomy from collective memory is a methodological assumption of the historian, I will argue that historiography is always interwoven with the political and ethical challenges of the historian’s time. In this regard, this paper ́s theses are inspired by Walter Benjamin’s ideas concerning historiography, as well as by the interpretations of his ideas provided by other historians and philosophers, such as Enzo Traverso, Dominick LaCapra or Michael Löwy. Their ideas will serve as a framework for understanding the challenges historians face when narrating contemporary history.

Fascism Writing and Memory

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

The Politics and Poetics of Suppression and “Memory Loss”

2015

The article discusses the role of subculture in Croatia and wider South Slavic context during and after the transitional period from the hegemony of Yugoslav communist system to the national state and its new narratives. The introduction discusses the modalities of memory loss in regard to the Yugoslav system of values. It focuses on the situation in popular culture and the new media, arguing that the process of memory loss has been orchestrated by the new national hegemony in both the media and politics and in the subcultural environment of marginal groups. The emphasis is put on the discursive tactics that have contributed to this process in the public sphere. The second part of the article concentrates on the relationship between the private and the public spheres and pays special attention to the relation between spontaneous subcultural practices and orchestrated mass-cultural outlets that very often construct the sphere of popular cultural needs. It is argued that the modalities of reconstructing and redirecting the narrative as an ethical (ethnic and political) issue remain an important topic not only for a better understanding of popular culture's hegemonic order but also for the modalities of survival of the narrative as a literary autonomous field.

Repressive Silences and Whispers of History: Lessons and Legacies of 1984

2015

The seemingly reformist ideology of forgetting the anti-Sikh violence of 1984 and moving on remains unconvincing to some especially when social justice remains unavailable. While the acknowledgement of heinous violence reminds us of the dark history, it is also mostly replete with erasures, omissions and strategic avoidance or manipulations of the represented violence and hidden ideologies. This article addresses and articulates ethical concerns and theoretical arguments regarding deliberate, nuanced perceptions of violent history especially in fictional and creative representations. Offering a Foucauldian analysis of Shonali Bose’s film Amu (2007) as an example, I propose that the film’s critical lens parallels the complexities and dilemmas in discursive formation of a passive subjectivity (be it of the victim or survivor of 1984 violence) that is unable to acquire viable agency after all. A similarly passive approach is encouraged in shaping popular perceptions about the discourse on 1984. The strategic scripting of the history of 1984 and its after-effects needs to be critically examined instead of assessing it only in terms of utility or lack thereof for future legacies.

The Past Under Erasure? History, Memory, and the Contemporary

Journal of Contemporary History, 2011

This article seeks to explore some particularities of history writing in the present. It considers in turn the meanings of the contemporary interest in memory, the different ways in which ideas about and images of the past circulate through the mass-mediated public sphere of the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries, the complexities of publicness and the public sphere, and the shifting boundaries between popular ideas of the past and changes in the discipline of history. It then turns to the example of (West) Germany between the 1960s and now. The article concludes with some reflections on changing perceptions of the overall character of the twentieth century.

Narratives of Power or Power of Narratives? 'Silencing The Past' and a History of Convenience

A normal textbook on modern world history often unfolds itself with the history of Monarchs, Queens, Knights, and major revolutions in European History, like Glorious, French, restorations, World wars, etc. All these episodes are dominantly mapping our minds to understand what is happening in the world. In these narratives, we barely find a name of a country like Haiti which once challenged the major power of the world, the French power, which is nonetheless important in its own right. But the major history writings, or the historians when they were writing history with some selected facts and narrating them as they are the sole important actors or the movers of history, they silenced some histories too. And these silences are found with the narratives which had lived experiences, which traveled through oral narratives, stories, etc, which had a direct experience with the actors of the fact. The association of historical writing with the creation of hegemony and power is an evident phenomenon despite the never-ending 'subjective' and 'objective' ways of doing history debate. One of the important functions of history has been to provide legitimacy to those who are in power. It is done through a selective narrativization of events from the past in a way which suits the convenience and knowledge system of the dominant ideology or those in power. Michel- Ralph Trouillot’s work ‘Silencing the Past’ is also an attempt to look at the processes which create the power discourses and declare themselves to be the 'mainstream' while cautiously ignoring the contradictory details.

Conference: The Poetics of Memory in Post-Totalitarian Narration

2007

This book sheds light on several totalitarian and post-totalitarian regions, such as Russia, Poland, Latvia, Serbia, Romania, China and South Africa. Taking the various genres and media of film, literature, art, autobiographies, testimonies, history textbooks, newspapers and websites as their point of departure, an international group of researchers examine the collective and individual memory in these regions, investigating its relation to poetics, identity, myth, history writing and, not least... its relation to the Truth.

Writing against history, in the Novel Without a Name and The Disappeared

2014

It raises a lot of questions when entirely fictional stories occur in real settings and situations. While Duong Thu Huong, the author of the Novel Without a Name (1995), explores central jungles of Vietnam towards the end of the war, Kim Echlin, the author of The Disappeared (2009) takes the reader to wander around in the post-genocide streets of Cambodia. Nevertheless, what they illustrate is not the official history, but the private memories of the past. This study examines each novel for their emphasis on remembering the past versus re-constructing the history in their settings. This analysis, also indicates the ways through which fiction can help relive in the reality of the past, and, hence, avoid its prepetition in the future.