Multispacecraft observations of sudden impulses in the magnetotail caused by solar wind pressure discontinuities: Wind and IMP 8 (original) (raw)

Abstract

Two upstream solar wind pressure discontinuities that were associated with storm sudden commencements have been examined to determine their effect on the geomagnetic tail lobe field. During the two events, occurring on March 9, 1995, and August 17, 1995, the Wind spacecraft was located in the upstream region monitoring the solar wind, and the IMP 8 spacecraft was in the geomagnetic tail lobe observing the tail response. The two events occurred during periods with northward or weak southward interplanetary magnetic field. In each case, the data suggest that the magnetic field in the tail lobe increased in magnitude directly in response to the external solar wind pressure increase. It is shown that a simple model in which a uniform magnetic field is compressed by a step function constriction accurately predicts characteristic timesca!es, which are of the order of a couple minutes, and the magnetic field profiles. The inferred flaring angles are COnsistent with model predictions, and the changes in the flaring angle across the discontinuities correspond to expectations based on changes in the subsolar magnetopause position and tail width. Overall, the results of this study indicate that the magnetotail maintains an approximate MHD equilibrium even as it responds rapidly to interplanetary pressure discontinuities. 1. Introduction Geomagnetic sudden commencements are observed as rapid perturbations in magnetic fields measured at low-latitude observatories of the order of 1-6 min and with magnitudes of several tens of nanotesla [Jursa, 1985]. They are produced by the passage of a solar wind pressure discontinuity or shock and its associated magnetospheric compression. The resulting sudden changes in geomagnetic field strength are observed throughout the magnetosphere, including in the magnetotail lobe [Kawano et al., 1992] where a "sudden increase" in the lobe magnetic field strength is observed [Sugiura et al., 1968] because of the magnetotail compression caused by the pressure enhancement. Currently, in the International Solar Terrestrial Physics (ISTP) era it is possible to study the effect of these pressure discontinuities on the tail lobes routinely by using multiple spacecraft. This study employs data from the IMP 8 and Wind spacecraft when Wind was in the upstream region monitoring the solar wind and observed a solar wind pressure increase and when IMP 8 was in the tail lobe. To avoid complications potentially introduced by the response of the lobe magnetic field strength to a southward interplanetary magnetic field (IMF)

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (43)

  1. Akasofu, S.-I., and J. K. Chao, Prediction of the occurrence and in- tensity of magnetospheric substorms, Geophys. Res. Lett., 6, 897- 899, 1979.
  2. Clemmons, J. H., C. W. Carlson, and M. H. Boehm, Impulsive ion injections in the morning auroral region, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 12,133-12,149, 1995.
  3. Crooker, N. U., G. L. Siscoe, C. T. Russell, and E. J. Smith, Factors controlling degree of correlation between ISEE 1 and ISEE 3 inter- planetary magnetic field measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 87, 2224- 2230, 1982.
  4. Dessler, A. J., Length of magnetospheric tail, J. Geophys. Res., 69, 3913-3918, 1964.
  5. Dessler, A. J., W. B. Hanson, and E. N. Parker, Formation of the geomagnetic storm main-phase ring current, J. Geophys. Res., 66, 3631-3637, 1961.
  6. Dungey, J. W., The steady state of the Chapman-Ferraro problem in two dimensions, J. Geophys. Res., 66, 1043-1047, 1961.
  7. Fairfield, D., Average and unusual locations of the Earth's magneto- pause and bow shock, J. Geophys. Res., 76, 6700-6716, 1971.
  8. Fairfield, D. H., On the average configuration of the geomagnetic tail, J. Geophys. Res., 84, 1950-1958, 1979.
  9. Fairfield, D. H., Solar wind control of the distant magnetotail: ISEE 3, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 21,265-21,276, 1993.
  10. Fairfield, D. H., and J. Jones, Variability of the tail lobe field strength, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 7785-7791, 1996.
  11. Fairfield, D. H., R. P. Lepping, E. W. Hones Jr., S. J. Bame, and J. R. Asbridge, Simultaneous measurements of magnetotail dynamics by IMP spacecraft, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 1396-1414, 1981.
  12. Jacquey, C., Time-variation of the large scale tail magnetic field prior to substorm related solar wind changes, paper presented at Inter- national Conference on Substorms, Eur. Space Agency, Versailles, France, May 13-17, 1996.
  13. Jursa, A. S. (Ed.), Handbook of Geophysics and the Space Environ- ment, ADA 16700, Natl. Tech. Inf. Serv., Springfield, Va., 1985.
  14. Kawano, H., T. Yamamoto, S. Kokubun, and R. P. Lepping, Rota- tional polarities of sudden impulses in the magnetotail lobe, J. Geo- phys. Res., 97, 17,177-17,182, 1992.
  15. Kelly, T. J., N. U. Crooker, G. L. Siscoe, C. T. Russell, and E. J. Smith, On the use of a sunward libration-point-orbiting spacecraft as an interplanetary magnetic field monitor for magnetospheric studies, J. Geophys. Res., 91, 5629-5636, 1986.
  16. Kokubun, S., L. A. Frank, K. Hayashi, Y. Kamide, R. P. LepPing, T. Mukai, R. Nakamura, W. R. Paterson, T. Yamamoto, and K. Yumoto, Large field events in the distant magnetotail during mag- netic storms, J. Geomagn. Geoelectr., 48, 561-575, 1996.
  17. Lepping, R. P., et al., The Wind magnetic field investigation, Space Sci. Rev., 71, 207-229, 1995.
  18. Lui, A. T. Y., Road map to magnetotail domains, in Magnetotail Phys- ics, edited by A. T. Y. Lui, pp. 3-9, Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, Md., 1987.
  19. Meng, C.-I., and D. S. Colburn, Magnetotail variations associated with the southward interplanetary magnetic field, J. Geophys. Res., 79, 1831-1835, 1974.
  20. Nakai, H., Y. Kamide, and C. T. Russell, Influences of solar wind parameters and geomagnetic activity on the tail lobe magnetic field: A statistical study, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 5511-5523, 1991.
  21. Ness, N. F., and H. E. Taylor, Observations of the interplanetary magnetic field, 4-12 July 1966, Ann. IQSY, 3, 366-374, 1969.
  22. Newbury, J. A., Electron temperature in the solar wind at i AU, Eos Trans. AGU, 77(47), 471, 1996.
  23. Ogilvie, K. W., and G. K. Parks, First results from WIND spacecraft: An introduction, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23, 1179-1181, 1996.
  24. Ogilvie, K. W., et al., SWE: A comprehensive plasma instrument for the Wind spacecraft, Space Sci. Rev., 71, 55-77, 1995.
  25. Ohtani, S., and S. Kokubun, IMP 8 magnetic observations of the high-latitude tail boundary: Locations and force balance, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 20,759-20,769, 1990.
  26. Owen, C. J., J. A. Slavin, I. G. Richardson, N. Murphy, and R. J. Hynds, Average motion, structure and orientation of the distant magnetotail determined from remote sensing of the edge of the plasma sheet boundary layer with E > 3 5 keV ions, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 185-204, 1995.
  27. Petrinec, S. M., and C. T. Russell, An empirical model of the size and shape of the near-Earth magnetotail, Geophys. Res. Lett., 20, 2695- 2698, 1993.
  28. Petrinec, S. M., and C. T. Russell, Near-Earth magnetotail shape and size as determined from the magnetopause flaring angle, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 137-152, 1996a.
  29. Petrinec, S. M., and C. T. Russell, Factors controlling the shape and size of the post-terminator magnetopause, Adv. Space Res., 18(8), 213-216, 1996b.
  30. Russell, C. T., G. L. Siscoe, and E. J. Smith, Comparison of ISEE-1 and -3 interplanetary magnetic field observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 7, 381-384, 1980.
  31. Sibeck, D. G., G. L. Siscoe, J. A. Slavin, and R. P. Lepping, Major flattening of the distant geomagnetic tail, J. Geophys. Res., 91, 4223- 4237, 1986.
  32. Sibeck, D. G., R. E. Lopez, and E. C. Roelof, Solar wind control of the magnetopause shape, location, and motion, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 5489-5495, 1991.
  33. Sittier, E. C., Jr., and J. D. Scudder, An empirical polytrope law for solar wind thermal electrons between 0.45 and 4.76 AU: Voyager 2 and Mariner 10, J. Geophys. Res., 85, 5131-5137, 1980.
  34. Slavin, J. A., B. T. Tsurutani, E. J. Smith, D. E. Jones, and D. G. Sibeck, Average configuration of the distant (<220 R•r) magneto- tail: Initial ISEE-3 magnetic field results, Geophys. Res. Lett., 10, 973-976, 1983.
  35. Slavin, J. A., E. J. Smith, D. G. Sibeck, D. N. Baker, R. D. Zwickl, and S.-I. Akasofu, An ISEE 3 study of average and substorm conditions in the distant magnetotail, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 10,875-10,895, 1985.
  36. Slavin, J. A., C. J. Owen, and M. Hesse, Evolution of the plasmoid-lobe interaction with downtail distance, Geophys. Res. Lett., 21, 2765- 2768, 1994.
  37. Spreiter, J. R., and A. Y. Alksne, Effect of neutral sheet currents on the shape and magnetic field of the magnetosphere tail, Planet. Space Sci., 17, 233-246, 1969.
  38. Spreiter, J. R., A. L. Summers, and A. Y. Alksne, Hydromagnetic flow around the magnetosphere, Planet. Space Sci., 14, 223-253, 1966.
  39. Sugiura, M., T. L. Skillman, B. G. Ledley, and J.P. Heppner, Propa- gation of the sudden commencement of July 8, 1966, to the magne- totail, J. Geophys. Res., 73, 6699-6709, 1968.
  40. Unti, T., and G. Atkinson, Two-dimensional Chapman-Ferraro prob- lem with neutral sheet, 1, The boundary, J. Geophys. Res., 73, 7319- 7327, 1968.
  41. M. R. Collier, R. P. Lepping, K. Ogilvie, J. A. Slavin, and A. Szabo, Laboratory for Extraterrestrial Physics, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771. (collier@lepjas.gsfc.nasa.gov)
  42. H. Laakso, Geophysical Research, Finnish Meterological Institute, P.O. Box 503, 00101 Helsinki, Finland.
  43. S. Taguchi, Department of Electronic Engineering, University of Electro-Communications, Chofu, Tokyo, 182 Japan. (Received April 18, 1997; revised August 27, 1997; accepted September 30, 1997.)