The Need for Early Tracheostomy in Patients with Traumatic Cervical Cord Injury (original) (raw)
Related papers
Predicting the need for tracheostomy in patients with cervical spinal cord injury
The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 2012
Approximately 75% of hospitalized patients with a cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) will require intubation and mechanical ventilation (MV) because of compromised respiratory function. It is difficult to predict those CSCI patients who will require prolonged ventilation and therefore will most benefit from early tracheostomy. This study intended to show the benefits of tracheostomy, particularly early, and to identify predictors of prolonged MV after CSCI. A retrospective review of patients aged 16 years and older with acute CSCI admitted to London Health Science Center from 1991 to 2010 was performed. Demographic data and clinical parameters were extracted from medical records and the trauma registry. Regression analysis was used to identify predictors of prolonged MV. There were 66 eligible patients of which 42 (62%) had a tracheostomy performed. Five patients (7.6%) remained ventilator dependent and seven (10.6%) died more than 7 days after injury secondary to sepsis. After adju...
2005
Background: Patients who sustain cervical spinal cord injury (C-SCI) with neurologic deficit may require a definitive airway and/or prolonged mechanical ventilation. The purpose of this study was to characterize factors associated with a high risk for respiratory failure and/or the need for mechanical ventilation in C-SCI patients. Methods: Patients with C-SCI and neurologic deficit admitted to a Level I Trauma Center between July 1, 2000 and June 30, 2002 were retrospectively reviewed for demographics, level and completeness of neurologic deficit, need for definitive airway, need for tracheostomy, need for mechanical ventilation at hospital discharge (MVDC), and outcomes. The level and completeness of injury were defined by American Spinal Injury Association standards. Results: One hundred nineteen patients with C-SCI and neurologic deficit were identified over this period. Of these, 45 were identified as complete C-SCI: 12 (27%) patients had levels of C1 to C4; 19 (42%) had a level of C5; and 14 (31%) had levels of C6 and below. There were 37 males and 8 females. There were 36 blunt and 9 penetrating injuries. The average age of these patients was 40؉/-21, and the average ISS was 45؉/-22. Eight of the patients with complete C-SCI died, for a mortality of 18%. Of the 37 survivors, 92% received a definitive airway, 81% received tracheostomy, and 51% required MVDC. All patients with complete injuries at the C5 level and above required a definitive airway and tracheostomy, and 71% of survivors required MVDC. Of the patients with complete injuries of C6 and below, 79% received a definitive airway, 50% required tracheostomy, and 15% of survivors required MVDC. Only 35% of incomplete injuries required a definitive airway, and only 7% required tracheostomy. Conclusions: The need for definitive airway control, tracheostomy, and ventilator dependence is significant, especially for patients with high complete C-SCI. Based on these results we recommend consideration of early intubation and tracheostomy for patients with complete C-SCI, especially for those with levels of C5 and above.
The safety of awake tracheal intubation in cervical spine injury
Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, 1992
As a referral centre for cervical spine injuries, we have routinely performed awake tracheal intubation when intubation was indicated. A retrospective case control study was undertaken to review the frequency of neurological deterioration and aspiration associated with our approach. Neurological deterioration was assessed by a change in level of injury or neurological grade at admission and discharge. Four hundred and fifty-four patients with critical cervical spine and~or cord injuries were reviewed over an eight-year period. A case group of 165 patients underwent tracheal intubation awake within two months of injury. A control group of 289 remained unintubated during the same period. A comparison of spinal neurological status between admission and discharge revealed no statistically significant difference in neurological deterioration between the two groups. This occurred despite a greater injury severity score in the case group. No evidence of aspiration during intubation was documented. We conclude that awake tracheal intubation is a safe method of airway management in patients with cervical spine injuries.
Time to tracheostomy impacts overall outcomes in patients with cervical spinal cord injury
Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2020
BACKGROUND: The morbidity associated with cervical spine injury increases in the setting of concomitant cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI). A significant proportion of these patients require placement of a tracheostomy. However, it remains unclear if timing to tracheostomy following traumatic CSCI can impact outcomes. The aim of our study was to characterize outcomes associated with tracheostomy timing following traumatic CSCI. METHODS: We performed a 5-year (2010-2014) analysis of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program database and included all adult (age, ≥18 years) trauma patients who had traumatic CSCI and received tracheostomy. Patients were subdivided into two groups: early tracheostomy (ET) (≤4 days from initial intubation) and late tracheostomy (LT) (>4 days). Outcome measures included respiratory complications, ventilator-free days, intensive care unit-free days and hospital length of stay, and mortality. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 5,980 patients were included in the study, of which 1,010 (17%) patients received ET, while 4,970 (83%) patients received LT. Mean age was 46 years, and 73% were men. In terms of CSCI location, 48% of the patients had high CSCI (C1-C4), while 52% had low CSCI (C5-C7). Patients in the ET group had lower rates of respiratory complications (30% vs. 46%, p = 0.01), higher ventilator-free days (13 days vs. 9 days; p = 0.02), intensive care unit-free days (11 days vs. 8 days; p = 0.01), and a shorter hospital length of stay (22 days vs. 29 days; p = 0.01) compared with those in the LT group. On regression analysis, ET was associated with lower rates of respiratory complications in patients with high CSCI (odds ratio, 0.55 [0.41-0.81]) and low CSCI (odds ratio, 0.93 [0.72-0.95]). However, no association was found between time to tracheostomy and in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: Early tracheostomy regardless of CSCI level may lead to improved outcomes. Quality improvement efforts should focus on defining the optimal time to tracheostomy and considering ET as a component of SCI management bundle.
Safety of early tracheostomy in trauma patients after anterior cervical fusion
The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 2018
Cervical spine injuries (CSIs) can have major effects on the respiratory system and carry a high incidence of pulmonary complications. Respiratory failure can be due to spinal cord injuries, concomitant facial fractures or chest injury, airway obstruction, or cognitive impairments. Early tracheostomy (ET) is often indicated in patients with CSI. However, in patients with anterior cervical fusion (ACF), concerns about cross-contamination often delay tracheostomy placement. This study aimed to demonstrate the safety of ET within 4 days of ACF. Retrospective chart review was performed for all trauma patients admitted to our institution between 2001 and 2015 with diagnosis of CSI who required both ACF and tracheostomy, with or without posterior cervical fusion, during the same hospitalization. Thirty-nine study patients with ET (within 4 days of ACF) were compared with 59 control patients with late tracheostomy (5-21 days after ACF). Univariate and logistic regression analyses were perf...
Bench-to-bedside review: early tracheostomy in critically ill trauma patients
Critical care (London, England), 2006
A significant proportion of trauma patients require tracheostomy during intensive care unit stay. The timing of this procedure remains a subject of debate. The decision for tracheostomy should take into consideration the risks and benefits of prolonged endotracheal intubation versus tracheostomy. Timing of tracheostomy is also influenced by the indications for the procedure, which include relief of upper airway obstruction, airway access in patients with cervical spine injury, management of retained airway secretions, maintenance of patent airway and airway access for prolonged mechanical ventilation. This review summarizes the potential advantages of tracheostomy versus endotracheal intubation, the different indications for tracheostomy in trauma patients and studies examining early versus late tracheostomy. It also reviews the predictors of prolonged mechanical ventilation, which may guide the decision regarding the timing of tracheostomy.
Collegium …, 2009
Percutaneous tracheostomy (PCT) is a safe method under proper patient selection, increased technical experience and bronchoscopy-or ultrasound-guided procedure. Trauma patients with cervical spine fractures and spinal cord injury are at a high risk for respiratory failure and require a definitive airway followed by prolonged mechanical ventilation. We would like to present multiple, life-threatening complications after unsuccessful attempt of the guidewire dilating forceps tracheostomy (GWDF) in one trauma patient with a cervical spine injury. With this case report we would like to lay emphasis on the importance of continuously bronchoscopy-or ultrasound-guided PTC in trauma patients, especially with cervical spine injury, as the need to respect the steep-learning curve in its performance.