Length and width tuning of neurons in the cat's primary visual cortex (original) (raw)
Related papers
Journal of Neuroscience - J NEUROSCI, 2004
In the primary visual cortex (V1), the single-neuron response to a grating stimulus placed in the classical receptive field (CRF) is suppressed by a similar stimulus presented in the CRF surround. To assess the input mechanism underlying the surround suppression, we tested the effects of iontophoretically administered GABAA-receptor antagonist, bicuculline methiodide (BMI), for the 46 V1 neurons in anesthetized cats. First, the stimulus-size tuning curves were studied, with or without BMI administration, for each neuron by changing the size of the grating patch. During the BMI administration, the shape of the normalized size tuning curve did not change considerably. Second, the dependency of surround suppression on the orientation of the surround grating was examined. In the control, the surround suppression showed the clear orientation tuning that peaked at an orientation the same as the optimal orientation of the CRF response. The BMI administration did not change the orientation ...
Organization of suppression in receptive fields of neurons in cat visual cortex
Journal of neurophysiology, 1992
1. The response to an optimally oriented stimulus of both simple and complex cells in the cat's striate visual cortex (area 17) can be suppressed by the superposition of an orthogonally oriented drifting grating. This effect is referred to as cross-orientation suppression. We have examined the spatial organization and tuning characteristics of this suppressive effect with the use of extracellular recording techniques. 2. For a total of 75 neurons, we have measured the size of each cell's excitatory receptive field by use of rectangular patches of drifting sinusoidal gratings presented at the optimal orientation and spatial frequency. The length and width of these grating patches are varied independently. Receptive-field length and width are determined from the dimensions of the smallest grating patch required to elicit a maximal response. 3. The extent of the area from which cross-orientation suppression originates has been measured in an analogous manner. Each neuron is exc...
2001
Spike responses for many cells of cat primary visual cortex are optimized for the length of a drifting grating stimulus. Stimuli that are longer or shorter than this optimal length elicit submaximal spike responses. To investigate the mechanisms responsible for this length tuning, we have recorded intracellularly from visual cortical neurons in the cat while presenting drifting grating stimuli of varying lengths. We have found that the membrane potential responses of the cells also exhibit length tuning, but that the suppression of spike responses at lengths longer than the preferred is 30-50% stronger than the corresponding suppression of the membrane potential responses. This difference may be attributed to the effects of spike threshold. Furthermore, using steady injected currents, we have measured changes in the excitatory and inhibitory components of input conductance evoked by stimuli of different lengths. We find that, compared with optimal stimuli, long stimuli evoke both an increase in inhibitory conductance and a decrease in excitatory conductance. These two mechanisms differ in their contrast sensitivity, resulting in stronger end stopping and shorter optimal lengths for high-contrast stimuli. These patterns suggest that response suppression for long stimuli is generated by a combination of active inhibition from stimuli outside the excitatory receptive field, as well as decreased excitation from other cortical cells that are themselves end-inhibited.
Brain Research, 1976
l) As a step towards specifying the spatial selectivity characteristics of complex cells with spatially periodic substructures, we have studied single cell responses to narrow slits of variable length moved across the receptive field in the preferred direction. In general, the length-response curves were linear over a considerable and sometimes full range until an optimal slit length was reached.
Mechanisms of inhibition in cat visual cortex
The Journal of Physiology, 1991
1. Neurones from layers 2-6 of the cat primary visual cortex were studied using extracellular and intracellular recordings made in vivo. The aim was to identify inhibitory events and determine whether they were associated with small or large (shunting) changes in the input conductance of the neurones. 2. Visual stimulation of subfields of simple receptive fields produced depolarizing or hyperpolarizing potentials that were associated with increased or decreased firing rates respectively. Hyperpolarizing potentials were small, 5 mV or less. In the same neurones, brief electrical stimulation of cortical afferents produced a characteristic sequence of a brief depolarization followed by a long-lasting (200-400 ms) hyperpolarization. 3. During the response to a stationary flashed bar, the synaptic activation increased the input conductance of the neurone by about 5-20 %. Conductance changes of similar magnitude were obtained by electrically stimulating the neurone. Neurones stimulated with non-optimal orientations or directions of motion showed little change in input conductance. 4. These data indicate that while visually or electrically induced inhibition can be readily demonstrated in visual cortex, the inhibition is not associated with large sustained conductance changes. Thus a shunting or multiplicative inhibitory mechanism is not the principal mechanism of inhibition.
A comparison of the strength of lateral inhibition in X and Y cells in the cat retina
Brain Research, 1978
During the last decade research from several laboratories indicates that both on-center and off-center retinal ganglion cells of cats can be subdivided into two groups. The two subtypes have been referred to as X and Y cells 6,1s, Type 1 and Type II cellsT, s, sustained and transient cells ~,12, surround-concealing/surroundrevealing cells 5, Group I and Group II cells 2° and S and T cells 14. Henceforth, we will adopt the language of Enroth-Cugell and Robson 6 and refer to these cells as X and Y cells --our Group II and Group I cells 2°, respectively.
Biological Cybernetics, 1989
The responses to visual stimuli of simple cortical cells show linear spatial summation within and between their receptive field subunits. Complex cortical cells do not show this linearity. We analyzed the simulated responses to drifting sinusoidal grating stimuli of simple and of several types of complex cells. The complex cells, whose responses are seen to be half-wave rectified before pooling, have receptive fields consisting of two or more DOG (difference-of-Gaussians) shaped subunits. In both cases of stimulation by contrast-reversal gratings or drifting gratings, the cells' response as a function of spatial frequency is affected by the subunit distances 2 lambda and the stimulation frequency omega. Furthermore, an increased number of subunits (a larger receptive field) yields a narrower peak tuning curve with decreased modulation depth for many of the spatial frequencies. The average and the peak response tuning curves are compared for the different receptive field types.
Experimental Brain Research, 1988
The spatial frequency tuning curves of neurones of area 18 depend upon the velocity of the visual stimulus. The higher the velocity the lower the spatial frequencies to which the cell is tuned. Since in area 17 the size of the cell receptive field is inversely related with the optimal spatial frequency to which the cell responds, we have investigated whether the shift of the optimal spatial frequency with the velocity corresponds to a "change" in the receptive field size. We recorded extracellularly from neurones in area 18; for each cell we selected two gratings, one of high spatial frequency drifting at low velocity and another of low spatial frequency drifting at high velocity to which the cell gave comparable responses. The results show that the masking of the cells receptive field which abolishes the response to the high frequency low velocity grating does not prevent the cell from responding to the low frequency high velocity grating. We conclude that the size of the receptive field of neurones in area 18 depends upon the characteristics (spatial frequency and velocity) of the visual stimulus.
Journal of neurophysiology, 1999
Intracortical inhibition contributes to direction selectivity in primary visual cortex, but how it acts has been unclear. We investigated this problem in simple cells of cat area 17 by taking advantage of the link between spatiotemporal (S-T) receptive-field structure and direction selectivity. Most cells in layer 4 have S-T-oriented receptive fields in which gradients of response timing across the field confer a preferred direction of motion. Linear summation of responses across the receptive field, followed by a static nonlinear amplification, has been shown previously to account for directional tuning in layer 4. We tested the hypotheses that inhibition acts by altering S-T structure or the static nonlinearity or both. Drifting and counterphasing sine wave gratings were used to measure direction selectivity and S-T structure, respectively, in 17 layer 4 simple cells before and during iontophoresis of bicuculline methiodide (BMI), a GABAA antagonist. S-T orientation was quantified...
Different mechanisms underlie three inhibitory phenomena in cat area 17
1998
Recently, it has been proposed that all suppressive phenomena observed in the primary visual cortex (V1) are mediated by a single mechanism, involving inhibition by pools of neurons, which, between them, represent a wide range of stimulus specificities. The strength of such inhibition would depend on the stimulus that produces it (particularly its contrast) rather than on the firing rate of the inhibited cell. We tested this hypothesis by measuring contrast-response functions (CRFs) of neurons in cat V1 for stimulation of the classical receptive field of the dominant eye with an optimal grating alone, and in the presence of inhibition caused by (1) a superimposed orthogonal grating (cross-orientation inhibition); (2) a surrounding iso-oriented grating (surround inhibition); and (3) an orthogonal grating in the other eye (interocular suppression). We fitted hyperbolic ratio functions and found that the effect of cross-orientation inhibition was best described as a rightward shift of the CRF ('contrast-gain control'), while surround inhibition and interocular suppression were primarily characterised as downward shifts of the CRF ('response-gain control'). However, the latter also showed a component of contrast-gain control. The two modes of suppression were differently distributed between the layers of cortex. Response-gain control prevailed in layer 4, whereas cells in layers 2/3, 5 and 6 mainly showed contrast-gain control. As in human observers, surround gratings caused suppression when the central grating was of high contrast, but in over a third of the cells tested, enhanced responses for low-contrast central stimuli, hence actually decreasing threshold contrast.