Long-Term Results From a 12Year Experience With Endovascular Therapy for Thoracic Aortic Disease (original) (raw)
Short term outcome of thoracic endovascular aortic repair in patients with thoracic aortic diseases
The Egyptian Heart Journal, 2018
Aim and background: Open surgical repair for thoracic aortic diseases is associated with a high perioperative mortality and morbidity. Most of type B aortic dissections are uncomplicated and are medically treated which carries a high mortality rate. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair is the first-line therapy for isolated aneurysms of the descending aorta and complicated type B aortic dissection. The aim of this study is to test the safety of early thoracic endovascular aortic repair in patients with uncomplicated type B aortic dissection and patients with thoracic aortic aneurysms. Methods: A total of 30 patients (24 men and 6 females; mean age 59 ± 8 years) with uncomplicated type B aortic dissection and descending thoracic aortic aneurysm who underwent endovascular aortic repair in National Heart Institute and Cairo University hospitals were followed up. Clinical follow-up data was done at one, three and twelve months thereafter. Clinical follow-up events included death, neurological deficits, symptoms of chronic mal-perfusion syndrome and secondary intervention. Multi-slice computed tomography was performed at three and six months after intervention. Results: Of the 30 patients, 24 patients had aortic dissection, and 6 patients had an aortic aneurysm. 7 patients underwent hybrid technique and the rest underwent the basic endovascular technique in whom success rate was 100%. Two patients developed type I endoleak, however both improved after short term follow up. The total mortality rate was 10% throughout the follow-up. Both death and endoleak occurred in subacute and chronic cases, while using TEVAR in acute AD and aneurysm showed no side effects. Early thoracic endovascular aortic repair showed better results and less complications. Conclusion: Along with medical treatment, early thoracic endovascular aortic repair in uncomplicated type B aortic dissections and thoracic aortic aneurysms is associated with better outcome.
Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2008
Objectives: Endovascular management of both acute and chronic thoracic aortic pathology has emerged as an alternative to open surgery. We reviewed our single center experience with endovascular devices for the treatment of thoracic aortic pathology. Methods: Between April 2000 and October 2007, 116 thoracic aortic stent grafts were placed to treat a variety of acute or chronic thoracic aortic lesions. Thirty-five percent of the cases were performed emergently. Sixty-five percent of the patients were male; the average age was 63.9 years (range 20-93 years). Indications for treatment were chronic degenerative aneurysms (n ؍ 70), traumatic aortic disruption (n ؍ 20), complicated dissection, intramural hematoma, or penetrating aortic ulcer (n ؍ 14), pseudoaneurysm (n ؍ 10), and Diverticulum of Kommerell (n ؍ 2). Arch vessel revascularization (n ؍ 32) or mesenteric debranching (n ؍ 7) was performed in select cases. Devices used were industry-approved thoracic aortic devices (n ؍ 80), aortic cuff extenders (n ؍ 19), or custom made by the surgeon (n ؍ 17). Results: The 30-day death, stroke and paraplegia/paresis rates were 5.2%, 8.6%, and 2.6%, respectively. Arterial access complications requiring immediate operative repair occurred at a rate of 11.2% (n ؍ 13). The endoleak rate requiring repeat intervention was 6.9% (n ؍ 8). The delayed graft infection rate was 5.2% (n ؍ 6), with four of these cases resulting in death. The mean follow-up is 15 months (range 1-78 months). Computed tomography angiograms were performed at 1, 6, and 12 months following the index procedure, and yearly thereafter.
Endovascular repair of thoracic and thoraco-abdominal aortic lesions
Annali italiani di chirurgia, 2019
BACKGROUND We report our "real-world" experience of endovascular repair of thoracic/thoraco-abdominal aortic lesions in patients treated from May 2002 to May 2017. METHODS Data of all consecutive treated patients were retrospectively collected in a database and analyzed. Patients were divided into 4 groups: atherosclerotic thoracic/thoraco-abdominal aneurysms (TAA/TAAA) and floating thrombus (group A); acute complicated type B dissection (TBD), penetrating aortic ulcers (PAU) and intra-mural hematomas (IMH) in group B; chronic TBD evolving in TAA (group C); traumatic injuries (group D). Mortality, reinterventions and occurrence of neurological complications, both at 30 days and in the long term, were analyzed as primary outcomes for each group. RESULTS Ninety-four patients were treated complessively, most for a TAA (55.3%). Thirty-days deaths and neurological complications were observed in group A only (5 cases each, 5.3%). A reintervention was necessary in 6 patients (6.4...
Endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic disease: Mid-term follow-up
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2007
on behalf of the EUROSTAR and the UK Thoracic Endograft Registry collaborators, Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Liverpool, London, and Sheffield, England; Aalst, Belgium; and Trondheim, Norway Purpose: The objective of this study was to assess the initial and 1-year outcome of endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections collated in the European Collaborators on Stent Graft Techniques for Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm and Dissection Repair (EUROSTAR) and the United Kingdom Thoracic Endograft registries. Methods: Four hundred forty-three patients underwent endovascular repair of thoracic aortic disease between September 1997 and August 2003 (EUROSTAR, 340 patients; UK, 103 patients). Patients represented 4 major disease groups: degenerative aneurysm (n ؍ 249), aortic dissection (n ؍ 131), false anastomotic aneurysm (n ؍ 13), and traumatic aortic injury (n ؍ 50). Results: Mean age in the entire study group was 63 years. Fifty-two percent of patients were deemed at high risk for open surgery because of major comorbidity. Sixty percent of patients underwent an elective procedure, and 35% required emergency treatment. Conventional indications for treatment of aortic dissection, including aortic expansion, continuous pain, rupture, or symptoms of branch occlusion constituted the basis for endograft placement in 57% of patients, whereas in 43% of patients aortic dissections were asymptomatic. Primary technical success was obtained in 87% of patients with degenerative aneurysm and in 89% with aortic dissection. Paraplegia was a postoperative complication in 4.0% of patients with degenerative aneurysm and 0.8% of patients with aortic dissection (not significant). Thirty-day mortality in the entire study group was 9.3%, with mortality rates after elective procedures of 5.3% for degenerative aneurysms and 6.5% for aortic dissection. Mortality for degenerative aneurysm after emergency repair was higher (28%; P <.0001) then after elective procedures. For aortic dissection the emergency repair rate was 12% (not significant compared with elective repair of aortic dissection, and P ؍ .025 compared with emergency repair of degenerative aneurysm). One-year follow-up was complete in 195 patients. The outcome at 1 year was more favorable for aortic dissection than for degenerative aneurysm with regard to aortic expansion (0% vs 15%; P ؍ .001) and late survival (90% vs 80%; P ؍ .048). In the groups with false anastomotic aneurysm and traumatic aortic injury, 30-day mortality rates were 8% and 6%, respectively. Conclusion: This multicenter experience demonstrates acceptable rates for operative mortality and paraplegia after endovascular repair of thoracic aortic disease. Outcome after 30 days and 1 year was more favorable for aortic dissection than for degenerative aneurysm. However, the durability of this technique is currently unknown, and continued use of registries should provide data from long-term follow-up. ( J Vasc Surg 2004;40:670-80.)
Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2016
Objective: This study reports the long-term results after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). Methods: Between 1997 and 2010, 269 patients were treated with TEVAR, 100 of them (72 male; mean age, 68.3 years) for aneurysmal disease. An intact TAA (iTAA) was present in 49 patients and an intact TAAA (iTAAA) in 18. In 25 patients, there was a ruptured TAA or ruptured TAAA (rTAA). Eight patients were admitted with a post-traumatic TAA (pTAA). Retrospective analysis was performed from a prospectively maintained database. Primary end points were 5-year all-cause and TEVAR-related mortality. Secondary end points were causes of death, complications, and reinterventions (RIs). A 5-year follow-up was complete in all cases. Results: The overall 5-year mortality rate was 50% (40.8% in iTAA, 80% in rTAA, 12.5% in pTAA, and 50% in iTAAA, respectively; log-rank test, P [ .00012). The overall procedure-related mortality was 21% (10.2% [n [ 5] in iTAA, 40% [n [ 10] in rTAA, 33% [n [ 6] in iTAAA, and 0 in pTAA, respectively; log-rank test, P [ .00013). Freedom from complication was 52%, 47.2%, and 47.2% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. There were a total of 30 RIs in 25 patients. Freedom from RI was 82%, 77.8%, and 71.2% at 1, 3, and 5 years. Stepwise forward logistic regression analysis revealed rTAA and occurrence of complications were risk factors for survival (odds ratios, 7.7 and 4.2, respectively). Conclusions: Long-term results after TEVAR for aneurysmatic aortic disease demonstrate considerable overall and procedure-related mortality in both elective and urgent indications. Complications and RIs occur still as late events and emphasize the necessity for long-term follow-up.
Survival Benefit of Endovascular Descending Thoracic Aortic Repair for the High-Risk Patient
Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2007
Background. Despite acceptable results reported with endovascular thoracic aortic repair (TEVAR), recent studies have questioned the merit of repair in asymptomatic patients considered high risk for open surgery. In this group, advanced age or comorbid conditions may reduce life expectancy, thus limiting the benefit of elective aneurysmectomy. This study was conducted to determine whether elective TEVAR improves survival for this cohort.
Thoracic endovascular aortic repair: a local single institution experience
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore, 2011
The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the short- to mid-term results of the endovascular repair of thoracic aortic disease and to present an overview of our experience with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in our institution. A retrospective review of all patients who were treated and underwent TEVAR in our institution between August 2004 and November 2009 was conducted. Technical success was achieved in 100% of the patients and the 30-day mortality rate was 0%. Perioperative endoleak was visualised at the end of the procedure in 4 patients. Secondary endoleak was observed in 2 patients. Mean hospital length of stay post-TEVAR was 15.4 days. Postoperative major complications were observed in 4 patients. The 30-day mortality rate was 0%, with 2 mortalities (11.1%) during the followup period. This study adds to the growing body of literature that support TEVAR as an effective procedure in the management of thoracic aortic diseases and reflects its feasibil...