Overcoming historical and institutional distrust: key elements in developing and sustaining the community mobilization against HIV in the Boston Haitian community (original) (raw)
Related papers
Community Crisis Management: The Case of Broward County's HIV/AIDS Collaboration Without Hierarchy
Academic, 2016
Collaboration refers to coming together of various stakeholders from different spheres with even divergent interests working assiduously to address a complex problem through collectively making decisions and/or implementing decisions and with societal health and well-being as the overarching rationale (Gray 1989). The nature of engagement requires harnessing human and material resources as a conduit to effectively meet various expectations associated with addressing the problem. The complex nature of the problem, as in this case HIV/AIDS, demands collective long-term engagement for sustainable solutions which will enable target populations to consistently receive needed services in consonance with established care and treatment standards. The stakeholders involved in collaboration may or may not derive any direct benefits as commitment to make a difference trumps any real or implied benefits. Collaboration in this context involves three-actor domains in Broward County: service providers, non-elected community leaders, and the HIV infected and affected, collectively called council members working together to provide needed care and treatment to target populations. Actors hereby connote participants who are part of policy process in either voluntary or mandatory capacity to help produce workable outputs and/or outcomes. And these actors’ efforts are greatly enhanced by the grantee and support staff of the deliberative body called the Council. The grantee is the official recipient and administrator of funds geared toward care and treatment of target populations, and support staff is trained personnel who assist council members and grantee on deliberation and related duties. Together, the council members, grantee, and support staff are integral to collaboration. There is no doubt the HIV/AIDS conundrum is a community crisis in Broward County, as it is the case nationally and internationally, and collaborative engagement of multiple stakeholders across sectors appears to be a proactive strategy for creative solutions and management of the crisis
The Influence of Community Context on How Coalitions Achieve HIV-Preventive Structural Change
Health Education and Behavior
Community coalition action theory (CCAT) depicts the processes and factors that affect coalition formation, maintenance, institutionalization, actions, and outcomes. CCAT proposes that community context affects coalitions at every phase of development and operation. We analyzed data from 12 Connect to Protect coalitions using inductive content analysis to examine how contextual factors (e.g., economics, collaboration, history, norms, and politics) enhance or impede coalitions' success in achieving outcomes. Consistent with CCAT, context affected the objectives that coalitions developed and those they completed. Results suggest that local prevention history and political support have particular impact on coalitions' success in creating structural changes. These data underscore the heuristic value of CCAT, yet also imply that the contextual constructs that affect outcomes are issue specific.
Ethnicity Disease, 2004
This article describes the application of participatory evaluation principles and methods to designing and conducting a community survey of the metropolitan Boston Haitian population. The findings of the evaluation baseline community survey of 2,719 Haitians are described, including an overview of the population characteristics and the prevailing HIV prevention knowledge, attitudes, and practices. The participatory evaluation approach was effective in building evaluation capacity, and provided a reliable data source with which to fine-tune the prevention intervention, and increase its efficacy in reducing HIV transmission.
Highlights • Coalition mobilization can contribute to the creation of AIDS-competent communities. • HIV coalitions benefit from leaders who can confront political opposition to structural changes. • Coalitions can contribute to addressing the structural factors that promote HIV-risk among youth. Abstract Connect to Protect (C2P), a 10-year community mobilization effort, pursued the dual aims of creating communities competent to address youth's HIV-related risks and removing structural barriers to youth health. We used Community Coalition Action Theory (CCAT) to examine the perceived contributions and accomplishments of 14 C2P coalitions. We interviewed 318 key informants, including youth and community leaders, to identify the features of coalitions' context and operation that facilitated and undermined their ability to achieve structural change and build communities' capability to manage their local adolescent HIV epidemic effectively. We coded the interviews using an a priori coding scheme informed by CCAT and scholarship on AIDS-competent communities. We found community mobilization efforts like C2P can contribute to addressing the structural factors that promote HIV-risk among youth and to community development. We describe how coalition leadership, collaborative synergy, capacity building, and local community context influence coalitions' ability to successfully implement HIV-related structural change, demonstrating empirical support for many of CCAT's propositions. We discuss implications for how community mobilization efforts might succeed in laying the foundation for an AIDS-competent community.
Research Paper, 2019
The complex HIV/AIDS conundrum calls for innovative approaches to tackle associated challenges. The multifaceted nature of the problem and the enormous burden on various sectors of a country's economy warrant a cross-sector stakeholders' engagement for effective and sustainable solutions. This research examines the use of an annual retreat involving interviews of key stakeholders involved in health services CARE Council as an avenue for collaborative governance within a local system context in the fight against the epidemic. The results highlight how inclusive and strategic preparation can result in judicious allocation priorities for various service categories. The results also convey how relevant capacities and competencies are jointly developed through creative inputs, outputs and/or outcomes to target populations. The apparent role of facilitative leadership and the embrace of cultural humility promote mutual commitment among the stakeholders toward purposeful ends. The case represents the viability of collaborative governance as a feasible postmodern alternative to mainstream governance and service delivery to various publics, especially in this contemporary era of complexity and volatility.
The leadership of communities in HIV service delivery
AIDS, 2015
HIV treatment and prevention strategies are lifelong endeavours, requiring not only comprehensive, high-quality, consistent and equitable medical services but also appropriate political and cultural milieus to be effective. Communities directly affected by HIV offer a unique expertise and understanding in developing services to meet the needs of people seeking out and utilizing HIV treatment, prevention and support services. Through their organizations and networks, and through partnerships with health systems, these communities provide leadership, services and advocacy to ensure the delivery of high-quality, comprehensive services to meet the needs of diverse populations affected by HIV. This article describes integrated approaches to service delivery in which affected communities play a key role in the development and implementation of HIV programmes. Further scale-up of these approaches to care can improve overall quality, reduce stigma and discrimination, increase demand for services and improve retention in care.