Foundations and Their Institutional Context: Cross-Evaluating Evidence from Germany and the United States (original) (raw)
Related papers
Philanthropic Foundations in Comparative Perspective: The Cases of Germany and the US
Over the last two decades or so, policy interest in philanthropic foundations has surged internationally. Particularly European countries have sought to create more favorable conditions for the establishment of foundations in an effort to emulate the American system where philanthropic support for a broad range of public purposes is still considered to be more common. However, how philanthropic foundations, and the social roles and functions they perform, differ cross-nationally remains little understood. This paper discusses some of the differences focusing on the cases of Germany and the United States.
Foundations in Switzerland: Between the American and the German Cases
American Behavioral Scientist, 2018
This article considers the current state of the Swiss foundation sector in relation to both its own historical development and its counterparts in Germany and the United States. Through a descriptive analysis of the database of the Center for Philanthropy Studies (CEPS) of 11,619 foundations and a case study of 2,679 foundations in 7 cantons, we show that despite the similarities to Germany in historical growth and to the United States in asset distribution Swiss foundations are unique in density and fields of activity they pursue. In terms of roles Swiss foundations are close to the U.S. foundations in their emphasis on complementarity, but in terms of approach are close to Germany with a significant number of grant-making foundations. Overall, it is found that despite some socioeconomic transformations in Switzerland the categorization of the foundation sector close to a liberal model has not fundamentally changed.
Comparative Highlights of Foundation Laws: The Operating Environment for Foundations in Europe
2021
The EFC and Dafne have published “Comparative Highlights of Foundation Laws” a broad, comparative overview of the diverse legal and fiscal environments of foundations, across 40 countries, as well as identifies relevant trends and developments. The report looks into how philanthropy in Europe is regulated from a comparative perspective, what legal requirements exist to establish a foundation, whether foundations can pursue only public-benefit or also private purposes, what governance requirements are set out, what forms of tax incentives exist to encourage philanthropic organisations and giving and how this differs across the continent or what impact anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism legislation has on the European philanthropy sector. “While many governments have introduced tax incentives to stimulate philanthropic activity, an enabling environment goes beyond tax incentives and includes the freedom to set up a public-benefit organisation, as well as the freedom of foundations and donors to operate without undue restrictions, either domestically or across borders,” says Hanna Surmatz, legal expert and co-lead of the Philanthropy Advocacy initiative. The study shows that despite trends towards more integration, old and new barriers to cross-border philanthropic action exist and a European single market for philanthropy and the public good is not yet a reality. Helmut Anheier, Senior Professor of Sociology at Hertie School and author of numerous books on philanthropy, argues in the Foreword of the publication: “More and more foundations work across national borders, and in particular their potential in the many hundreds of EU cross-border regions seems immense. In this context, there is an urgent need for a common European framework, especially in terms of cross-border tax treatment and programme activities.”
Revista General de Derecho Publico Comparado, 2014
This study analyses the possibility of comparing the different figures that have the name of "foundation" (or similar) in the United States, England, Germany, France and Spain; examining their nature, structure, and operations to see if the term has the same meaning everywhere, both nominally and legally. On this basis, their fundamental elements are examined in legal and socio-legal terms, particularly their public purpose, the nature of their patrimony, and trust. Also examined are the basic legal regulation, systems of governance, control or supervision by public authorities and, finally, internal or external mechanisms for accountability. Based on this, and with a view to a possible homologation at the institutional level, an evaluation is made to see if these systems and mechanisms of governance, supervision and accountability are more or less similar, what they consist of, and what main lines of action are taking place in the various countries. Despite major historical and legal differences, and also the terminology used, it is surprising to see that these institutions have followed very similar evolutions and share more similarities than might appear.
Towards a Comparative Understanding of Foundations
Reviewing information on philanthropic foundations in the United States, Germany, and 10 other countries, this article presents an overview assessment of the major similarities and difficulties involved in cross-national comparisons of this particular organizational form. Over the past two or three decades, foundations have experienced significant growth in many parts of the world, spurred by enabling policies devised by policymakers eager to generate private resources for public purposes. This article comparatively discusses relationships between foundations and other sectors, including the state; the purposes, approaches, and roles foundations pursue; and what makes these institutions distinctive. It concludes with some policy considerations.
Foundations in Germany and Israel: An Analysis of the Legal Framework
Israel Law Review, 2002
This article compares the law of foundations (charities) in Germany and Israel. What is a foundation and what it is created for, may receive different answers in different legal systems. When an Israeli jurist refers tohekdesh, he is not referring to the same concepts included in the GermanStiftung. These differences find expression both in practical and theoretical matters. For example, German law recognizes the foundation as a legal personality, a characteristic lacking in Israeli law. Moreover, in Germany a foundation managing a business enterprise, or an enterprise adopting the legal form of a foundation, is an accepted phenomenon, but this is not accepted in Israel.To understand what a foundation is, it is necessary to distinguish between the different types of foundations: on one hand public or private ones, and on the other hand religious and secular foundations. This article discusses the methods of creating a foundation (mortis causaorinter vivos) and examines the elements ...
Philanthropic foundations in Belgium: Issues for governance in the public interest
2014
Based on sixteen exploratory interviews with Belgian philanthropic foundations, we investigate the governance mechanisms that these organizations set up in order to achieve their public interest mission. Our paper describes the Belgian foundations' governance practices and the governance challenges these foundations are confronted with. We then discuss three critical governance issues raised by the foundation sector in Belgium, and we identify three tensions that Belgian foundations need to solve to become legitimate in the achievement of their social missions.
Traditional methods of funding: Endowments and foundations
1996
Over the course of the last century, the voluntary or nonprofit sectors in most of Europe have increasingly come to rely on the state as a primary source of revenue. While the growth of the welfare states spurned extended nonprofit delivery of services during the 1960s and 1970s, the 1980s saw a reversal of fortunes. Drastic cutbacks on government spending heavily affected nonprofit organisations all over Europe, and lead to what has been termed a 'resource crisis.' On the other hand, widespread dissatisfaction with the performances of the welfare states at the same time fostered a reappraisal of citizen initiatives for the common good, paving the way for a new era of private maecenatism. Within this broader framework, voluntary organisations, individual as well as corporate donors, and--as recent legislation in France, Germany, and Austria suggests-even governments are taking a renewed interest in foundations as one of the oldest means of organised philanthropy. In this chapter, we analyse both the potential as well as the limitations of foundations in resourcing Europe's private nonprofit sectors.
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 2018
As philanthropic foundations take on increasingly prominent sociopolitical roles, the need for stronger conceptualizations of foundations as an organizational form is articulated widely across academic, policy, and practice contexts. Building on institutional research’s tradition of categorizing, classifying and typologizing organizational forms, our article critically explores the different ways in which foundations have been cast and differentiated in international academic and practice literatures. Examining and integrating these, we propose an integrative framework of foundation types. Incorporating 13 categories—three contextual, five organizational, and five strategic ones—the framework allows for clarifying distinctions and identifying commonalities between different foundation forms, offering a basis for developing more reflective and differentiated research and practice knowledge.