Multislice CT for assessing in-stent dimensions after left main coronary artery stenting: a comparison with three dimensional intravascular ultrasound (original) (raw)
Related papers
Advanced Biomedical Research, 2017
Background: Diagnostic value of multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) for detecting in-stent restenosis in comparison with conventional coronary angiography remained uncertain. The present study aimed to determine the value of MSCT for detecting in-stent restenosis. Materials and Methods: This historical cohort study was included 226 patients with the history of percutaneous coronary intervention from 2000 to 2014 that referred to MSCT Unit at Alzahra Heart Center in Isfahan. The subjects were followed-up by telephone with regard to performing coronary angiography up to 3 months after MSCT and their status about cardiac events. Results: Among all participants, 63 stents (27.9%) underwent coronary angiography up to 3 months afte r MSCT that 2 stents in left circumfl ex artery (LCX) assessment, 2 in left anterior descending (LAD) assessments and none in right coronary artery (RCA) assessment were uninterpretable. Sensitivity, specifi city, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of MSCT was 92.9%, 66.6%. 92.9%, 66.6%, and 88.2%, respectively for detection of occlusion in LCX stents, 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, and 100%, respectively for detection of occlusion in LAD stents, and 80.0%, 0.0%, 80.0%, 0.0%, and 66.7%, respectively for detection of occlusion in RCA stents. Overall, MSCT had sensitivity of 93.8%, specifi city of 70.0%, PPV of 93.8%, NPV of 70.0%, and accuracy 89.7% for detection of coronary stent restenosis. Conclusion: MSCT has high diagnostic value for detecting in-stent restenosis. Diagnostic accuracy of MSCT for detecting stent restenosis is considerably different between the coronary arteries with the highest diagnostic values for LAD and the lowest diagnostic values for RCA.
The American journal of …, 2008
To determine whether 64-slice multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography (MDCTA) can accurately assess the coronary artery lumen in symptomatic patients with previous coronary artery stents and potential in-stent restenosis (ISR). The primary aim was to determine the accuracy of binary ISR exclusion using MDCTA compared with invasive catheter angiography (ICA). Secondary aims were comparisons of stent dimensions measured using MDCTA and variables that affect accuracy. Forty patients with previous stent placement underwent both ICA and 64-slice MDCTA after elective presentation with chest pain, and ICA quantitative coronary angiographic data were used as the reference standard. Thirty-six men and 4 women (age 64 ؎ 10 years; range 44 to 83) with 103 stents (2.8 ؎ 1.6 stents/patient) were comparatively evaluated (stent exclusion rate 9.6%). There were 45 bare-metal and 58 drug-eluting stents (20 ؎ 18 months after implantation) with an average diameter of 3.23 ؎ 0.7 mm. Overall accuracy for the detection of significant ISR showed sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 85%, 86%, 61%, and 96% for proximal stents >3 mm, which improved to 100%, 94%, 81%, and 100%; if the visible luminal diameter on MDCTA was <1.5 mm, accuracy decreased to 40%, 84%, 29%, and 90%, respectively. In conclusion, 64-slice MDCTA assessment of symptomatic patients with suspected clinically significant ISR is a realistic alternative to ICA if reference stent diameter is >2.5 mm and visible lumen cross-sectional diameter is >1.5 mm, for which a negative MDCTA result virtually excludes the presence of significant ISR.
Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery stent patency with multislice CT: preliminary experience
La Radiologia medica
PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography (MSCT-CA) in the detection of in-stent restenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-two patients (33 male, 9 female, mean age 58+/-8 years) previously subjected to percutaneous implantation of coronary stent with suspected in-stent restenosis, underwent a 16-row MSCT (Sensation 16, Siemens) examination. The average time between stent implantation and MSCT-CA was 7.4+/-5.3 months. The following scan parameters were used: collimation 16x0.75 mm, rotation time 0.42 s, feed 3.0 mm/rot., kV 120, mAs 500. After administration of iodinated contrast material (Iomeprol 400 mgI/ml, 100 ml at 4 ml/s) and bolus chaser (40 ml of saline at 4 ml/s) the scan was completed in <20 s. All segments with a stent were assessed by two observers in consensus and were graded according to the following scheme: patent stent, in-stent intimal hyperplasia (IIH) (lumen reduction <50%), in-stent restenosis (ISR) ...
European Journal of Radiology, 2010
The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice CT angiography for the detection of coronary in-stent restenosis in patients treated with coronary stents when compared to conventional coronary angiography. Materials and Methods: A search of PUBMED/MEDLINE, ProQuest and Cochrane library databases for English literature was performed. Only studies comparing 64slice CT angiography with conventional coronary angiography for the detection of coronary in-stent restenosis (more than 50% stenosis) were included for analysis. Sensitivity and specificity estimates pooled across studies were tested using a fixed effects model. Results: Fourteen studies met selection criteria for inclusion in the analysis. The mean value of assessable stents was 89%. Prevalence of in-stent restenosis following coronary stenting was 20% among these studies. Pooled estimates of the sensitivity and specificity of overall 64-slice CT angiography for the detection of coronary instent restenosis was 90% (95% CI: 86%, 94%) and 91% (95% CI: 90%, 93%), respectively, based on the evaluation of assessable stents. Diagnostic value of 64slice CT angiography was found to decrease significantly when the analysis was performed with inclusion of nonassessable segments in five studies, with pooled sensitivity and specificity being 79% (95% CI: 68%, 88%) and 81% (95% CI: 77%, 84%). Stent diameter is the main factor affecting the diagnostic value of MSCT angiography. Conclusion: Our results showed that 64-slice CT angiography has high diagnostic value (both sensitivity and specificity) for detection of coronary in-stent restenosis based on assessable segments when compared to conventional coronary angiography.
New Directions for Community Colleges, 2002
Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) is routinely used for assessment of strategies aimed at reducing in-stent restenosis. Yet QCA enables only the measurement of luminal variation of stented segments and, unlike intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), provides only an indirect estimation of late in-stent neointimal formation, which has a key role in the process of in-stent restenosis. The aims of the present study were to correlate the IVUS measurement of in-stent intimal hyperplasia (IH) with QCA indexes of restenosis, to find out whether QCA is an adequate surrogate of IVUS, and, using either QCA and IVUS data, to define the sample sizes needed to demonstrate the effectiveness of strategies to reduce in-stent restenosis. The database of the European Imaging Laboratory was used to screen 154 stents implanted between 1997 and 2001 and studied by IVUS at 6 ± 1 months of follow-up. All cases underwent serial QCA assessment (preintervention, postintervention, and follow-up). Only 131 cases with single stent implantation in native coronary arteries were included in the study. Stent restenosis, defined as percent diameter stenosis (DS) > 50%, was present at QCA in 69 out of 131 cases (53%). Linear regression analyses were performed to correlate the amount of IH, calculated by IVUS as the average of all cross-section areas (CSA; mean % IH CSA) and QCA indexes of restenosis (late loss and % DS). A positive significant correlation was found between IVUS mean % IH CSA and QCA % DS (r = 0.74; P < 0.0001) and between IVUS mean % IH CSA and QCA late loss (r = 0.72; P < 0.0001). Based on IVUS measurements of mean % IH CSA, a total sample size of 74 stents would be required in a two-arm comparison to have 0.80 power to detect at 0.05 significant level a 30% difference between two compared groups. Alternatively, adopting the QCA late loss, 230 stents would be required. QCA measurements of late in-stent restenosis are well correlated with IVUS calculation of in-stent neointimal formation. IVUS assessment of IH allows smaller sample sizes than QCA to document significant reductions of in-stent restenosis. Therefore, the use of IVUS should be encouraged in comparison studies aimed at revealing significant neointimal differences in small sample size populations. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2002;57:155–160. © 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 1999
While quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) remains the standard used to assess new interventional therapies, intracoronary ultrasound (ICUS) is gaining interest. The aim of the study was to determine the relationship between QCA and quantitative coronary ultrasound (QCU) measurements after stenting. Sixty-two consecutive patients with both QCA and QCU analysis after stent implantation were included in the study. The mean luminal diameter (QCU vs. QCA) were 2.74 ؎ 0.46 mm and 2.41 ؎ 0.49 mm (P F 0.0001), the minimal luminal diameter (MLD) 2.08 ؎ 0.44 mm and 1.62 ؎ 0.42 mm (P F 0.0001), and the projected QCU MLD 1.90 ؎ 0.42 mm (P F 0.0001 with respect to QCA). Percentage obstruction diameter (QCU vs. QCA) were 41.53% ؎ 10.78% and 43.15% ؎ 12.72% (P ؍ NS). The stent diameter (QCU vs. QCA) were 3.54 ؎ 0.65 mm and 3.80 ؎ 0.37 mm (P ؍ 0.0004). Stent length measured by QCU were longer at 31.11 ؎ 13.54 mm against 28.63 ؎ 12.75 mm, P F 0.0001 with respect to QCA. In conclusion, while QCA and QCU appear to be comparable tools for measuring corrected stent diameters and stent lengths, smaller luminal diameters were found using QCA. This is of particular relevance to quantitative studies addressing absolute changes in vascular or luminal diameters. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 48:133-142, 1999.
Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, 2013
Coronary artery stenting is currently treatment of choice for management of coronary artery disease. Stent restenosis is the most important problem during follow up. Conventional coronary angiography is the gold standart for assessment of intracoronary stent patency. It is an invasive method and even though rare, has some significant risks. For this reason, noninvasive imaging methods are necessary to evaluate stent patency. Noninvasive methods such as the exercise test, myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and stress echocardiography could not reach enough diagnostic accuracy. Multislice computed tomography (MSCT) has been under investigation for stent restenosis detection. Aim of this study is to investigate usefulness of the 16-slice CT for evaluation of stent patency in patients with suspicion of stent restenosis. Thirty six patients were included in the study and 16-slice CT and conventional coronary angiographies were performed in all patients. The results of 16-slice CT and conventional coronary angiography were compared. Sufficient or good quality imaging with 16-slice CT angiography was obtained in 69% of all patients. Sixteen-slice CT angiography detected 42/49 (86%) stents and gave the correct localization for all of the detected stents. Stent lumen could be assessed in 30 (61%) stents and according to the results of luminal assessment, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and diagnostic accuracy of 16-slice MSCT were calculated as 33%, 95%, 75%, 77% and 77%, respectively. According to these results, the diagnostic performance of 16-slice CT angiography for detection of stent restenosis was relatively low. However, the assessment of relatively small number of stents because of insufficient heart rate control did not allow reliable and precise evaluation. Our results showed that diagnostic capacity of 16-slice CT angiography for detection of coronary stent restenosis is limited.