Challenging hydro-hegemony of India: resistance of Nepal in the Upper Karnali and Saptakoshi dam project (original) (raw)
Related papers
Nepal–India water cooperation: consequences of mutuality or hegemony?
Water Policy
This article reviews the relationship between Nepal and India, particularly in water resources cooperation. The two South Asian neighbours have entered into a number of agreements/treaties in water resources, namely, Sarada Agreement (1920), Kosi Agreement (1954), Gandak Agreement (1959) and Mahakali Treaty (1996). Nepal is criticized within the country for being unable to secure its benefits, and that all the agreements are in India's favour. However, the Indian side claims that overpoliticization of water issues in Nepal is the reason for not achieving the benefits from these agreements. Since the Mahakali Treaty, there has been deadlock in Nepal–India water cooperation as the implementation of the treaty has not materialized even after more than two decades since its ratification. Therefore, all the forms of cooperation in the past between Nepal and India can be viewed as the consequence of hydro-hegemony rather than mutuality. The article concludes that both nations need to ...
Assertion or Abjuration: India-Nepal Water Relations
Pramod Jaiswal (ed.)Revisiting Nepal’s Foreign Policy in Contemporary Global Power Structure,New Delhi, 2017
Nepal and India are neighbors with unequal level of power in the region. This unequal standard is visible in their mutual relations as well. Nepal is a landlocked state; four rivers flow from Nepal to India. This chapter is an attempt to see how river water sharing was politically settled. How the lower riparian (India) diplomatically protected its rights from a weak upper riparian state (Nepal). But the other side of the research is how the weak party to the treaty attempted to protect its interest. To understand the water sharing at different occasion we need to look in the developments leading to the conclusion of different water sharing treaties between the two nations.
Topography and the hydraulic mission: water management, river control and state power in Nepal
International Journal of Water Resources Development, 2018
We examine the Nepali state's role in water management over time and space. Using the hydraulic mission model, we use historical material, policy documents and interviews. From the 1800s, state water management concentrated on the Kathmandu valley. The 1960s witnessed the hydraulic mission launch in the lowlands through construction of public irrigation canals. Since the 1990s, a consolidating hydraulic mission climbed to the hills and mountains through hydropower development. We argue that over time, topography played a determining role in application of state power and water control through infrastructure development, and that attention to geography helps refine the hydraulic mission model.
Shared Water Resources: Indo-Nepal Conflict and Cooperation
Nepal and India share transboundary rivers in the Ganges Basin. Sapta-Kosi, Sapta-Gandaki, Mahakali and Karnali are some of them. In the dry season, Nepali rivers contribute up to 70% of the total flow to the Ganges, while the contribution on average annual flow is about 45%. Nepal and India have signed bilateral treaties and agreements to utilise shared rivers, but politicisation of these pacts has obstructed development. This chapter aims to contribute on policy programming thereby addressing the gaps. It identifies and delineates the potential of cooperation and conflict between Nepal and India in managing transboundary rivers. International water laws, bilateral treaties and agreements are also reviewed to present evidence. Likewise, interviews were also conducted with water sector experts to be better informed of their perceptions about Indo-Nepal shared water resources.
Hydropolitics and hydropolitical dynamics between India and Nepal: an event-based study
Water Policy, 2017
India and Nepal not only share common borders and cultures, but also share precious freshwater sources, i.e., rivers. Rivers have been discussed often in the political corridors because they cross international borders, which transform water reserves into a competitive resource and lead to hydropolitical dynamics between riparian countries. Nepal and India are two of the major riparian nations that share the mighty and complex Ganges Basin. The objective here was to study the more-than-a-century-old hydro-diplomacy between India and Nepal, passing through tumultuous political scenarios to understand how water relations have been shaped and reshaped with time. For this, a database of historical individual events/actions of water cooperation and conflict from 1874 to 2014 was compiled. These events/actions were ranked by intensity, using precise definitions of conflict and cooperation as suggested by the Transboundary Freshwater Dispute Database under the Basins at Risk project formul...
Economic Anthropology, 2016
This article interrogates Nepal’s ongoing and intensifying attempt to become a “hydropower nation” by focusing ethnographic attention on new kinds of subjectivity, identity, and agency emerging at the frontiers of hydropower development in the Upper Trishuli and Upper Tamakoshi watersheds of central Nepal. Drawing on 13 months of field study and ethnographic observation, this article makes a series of arguments about the coevolutionary relationship between the production of an imagined hydropower future and the diverse positions of Nepali citizens living and working along this expanding hydropower frontier. Thematically, my analysis focuses on (a) the scale and velocity of hydropower development in Nepal, (b) the polyvalent role of the hydropower sector within Nepal’s recent history of political volatility and vacuums of local governance, (c) an increasingly complex politics of recognition based on “project-affected” identities, and (d) emerging trends of financialization and mobilization sparked by the proliferation of shareholder-based models of benefit sharing that affect the discourse on risk sharing and stakeholder rights in crucial ways. Building on other critical scholarship on Himalayan hydropower development, this article seeks to disaggregate the technical and discursive abstractions of the Nepalese hydroscape by providing an ethnographic account of the micropolitics and praxis that shape the lived experience of hydropower development in Nepal. Keywords Energy Politics; Finance; Corporate Social Responsibility; State Making; Himalayan Studies
The Hegemonic Hydro-Politics of South-Asia: Can International Law balance the Geographical Imbalance
National Defence University Journal of International Law, 2021
A hydro-hegemon is a state with shared river basins that asserts its power over the other riparian states. As a consequence of being a hydro-hegemon, the State then asserts and retains its positions through bilateralism rather than regionalism. This bilateralism strengthens not just its own needs but also the negotiating power. While there are arguments that hydro-hegemony might be a factor leading to stability, it is seen in the South Asian context that this hydro-hegemony disadvantages the neighbouring countries of Pakistan, Bangladesh and Nepal. In the context of South Asia, the hydro-hegemon is India. The paper will delve further into international law recourse available to neighbours and argue for a more regional approach to be adopted, which will not just benefit the neighbours but also India, as the hydro-hegemon, itself.
Nepal's hydropower development: Predicament and dilemma in policy-making
Natural Resources Forum, 2021
Nepal, the world's second most water-rich country, nevertheless struggles to provide sufficient domestic electricity. Despite Nepal's potential to become the hydropower source for South Asia, it still relies heavily on importing electricity from India. This paper investigates why Nepal's hydropower capacity is inadequately utilized from both domestic and international perspectives and finds that domestic factors such as geo-climate features, weak infrastructure, political instability, and institutional deficiencies significantly hinder Nepal's hydropower development. From an international perspective, Nepal's geopolitical bonds and energy dependency with India and the regional powersharing configuration have significantly influenced its hydropower policy-making. Furthermore, this paper proposes how Nepal could sustainably develop its hydropower for self-sufficiency by establishing better policy instruments, attracting foreign investments, and upgrading its electricity infrastructure.
Thesis Eleven, 2019
The dam rush in the upper-Brahmaputra River basin and local, minority resistance to it are the result of complex geopolitical and parochial causes. India and China’s competing claims for sovereignty over the watershed depend upon British and Qing Dynasty imperial precedents respectively. And the two nation-states have extended and enhanced their predecessors’ claims on the area by continuing to erase local sovereignty, enclose the commons, and extract natural resources on a large scale. Historically, the upper basin’s terrain forestalled the thorough integration of this region into both nation-states, but recent technological and economic advances have enabled the two states and their agents to dramatically transformed these landscapes. Many of their projects have perpetuated the interventionist hydrological regimes that India and China also inherited from their imperial forebears. Nevertheless, as with their definition of their borders, neither state has highlighted this historical...