Constructing structural concepts by means of physical models (original) (raw)
Related papers
"Constructing Equilibrium": A methodological approach to teach structural design in architecture
Proceedings of the IV International Conference on Structural Engineering Education Without Borders, 2018
In recent years, a renewed interest in structural matters and interdisciplinarity has risen, bringing forward challenges in professional and academic practices. The present work seeks to contribute to this discussion by unfolding a conscious proposition as implemented by the Chair of Structural Design at the Department of Architecture of ETH Zurich. Founded on the intrinsic features of architectural education, the “Constructing Equilibrium” second-year structural design exercise shifts the focus to the synthetic aspect and the conceptual component of structural education. The exploration of the structural concept is introduced as a playful activity of a qualitative nature, based on an intuitive understanding of structural performance in three-dimensional space, informed by the interaction with material constructs in an interplay between the concrete and the abstract.
2014
The structure of education within the Faculty of Architecture, Slovak University of Technology, Bratislava, Slovakia, is a standing topic of discussion. The authors have tried to perfect a model, which could join knowledge of architecture, civil engineering, statics and material in a natural way. The structure is an element, which has the power to connect them. It connects the thought with matter in education and in real architecture. Integration of the knowledge of structures and civil engineering is a part of the study programmes in subjects from the studio creation group. The first part is a theoretical preparation in individual blocks of compulsory subjects with a focus on structure, which confirms the need to direct the education by encouraging analytical thinking, understanding of structural principles and, finally, attempting to try something new and unconventional (an experiment) in the studio. This system is being tested, but it follows the line from mechanical absorption a...
2020
This paper aims to present the integrated teaching activity carried out in the Studios of the Master of Science “Architecture-Building Architecture” held at the School of Architecture Urban Planning Construction Engineering of the “Politecnico di Milano,” Milan, Italy. The integrated teaching activity related to the structural disciplines was in Sgambi et al., 2019; here the structure of the MSc training and its disciplinary synergies will be presented. Indeed, this type of activity characterizes all the Studios of this Master of Science and involves all the disciplines that contribute to the development of an architectural and cultural heritage preservation project.,In the Studios of the aforementioned Master of Science, teachers of different subjects are involved, working together to guide the student in the development of an architectural project sustainable in all aspects. The fundamentals of each discipline are taught using the best suited teaching methodology and the applicati...
Structural Art, the 4th Dimension, and Metaphors for Teaching Design
Proceedings from the IASS Annual Symposium 2019, 2019
The potential for a work of structural engineering to extend beyond the literal and inspire our aesthetic sensibility – to be structural art – is to see in a physical work signs of the creative human spirit that are fundamental to design. We understand that structural art is possible from the great achievements of the past, upon which we build both technically and artistically, to design for the present and the future. This indeed was part of the spirit of David Billington’s teaching at Princeton University – to abstract principles from the great works and artists of the past to fuel our design creativity. This paper elaborates upon this dual perspective as fundamental to teaching design. Also presented as laudable figures in the lineage of design education, Eugene Emanuel Viollet-le-Duc and Hardy Cross have offered an enriched perspective on time and change in structural engineering.
Building Technology Educator's Society: Vol. 2019 , Article 21, 2019
As part of an accredited architectural curriculum, students participate in a series of courses that introduce concepts of statics, structural principles, and methods of system analysis. As many students frequently become enamored with initial form generating procedures as an approach to architectural design, they regrettably consider the lessons presented within the sequence of structural courses as ancillary consequences to form making processes and disconnected from their concurrent design studio explorations. These assumptions lead to students over-emphasizing the appearance of an architectural act, as opposed to placing value on how architecture performs, offers spatial organization, and engages the site and its users. This paper challenges these aforementioned perceptions by introducing a pedagogical approach focused on investigating and embracing the performance of structural assemblies as an inspiration for architectural design within these supporting structural courses. A series of physical explorations were presented to students as an opportunity to expand upon their understanding of the lessons, simultaneously being covered in class, related to the behavior of forces and the capabilities of structural systems to transfer and withstand various loading scenarios. These hand-on exercises asked the students to design and fabricate physical models to be tested under various performance criteria and challenged the students to consider ways in which structural behaviors and architectural design might inform one another. The students were assessed on their ability to innovate, test, reconsider, and summarize their predictions and findings for how their designed systems behaved internally and responded to applied external influences. Along each of the phases for these projects, students were asked to embrace failure as an integral part of the iterative design phase, persuading students to primarily focus on designing performance-orientated solutions and concentrate on studying how the actions of constituent parts systematically contributed to the performance of its composite assembly.