Economic Miracle and Upward Accountability: A Preliminary Evaluation of the Chinese Style of Fiscal Decentralization (original) (raw)
Related papers
Decentralizing China: analysis of central strategies in China's fiscal reforms
Journal of Contemporary China, 2009
China's post-Mao reforms have devolved significant economic and fiscal power from central to local governments. However, decentralization from above involves political risks: weakened central control and increased local discretion may allow local governments to engage in self-interested activities with negative externalities to other regions and even the whole nation. A crucial question thus arises: how can the national government enjoy the benefits of decentralization while at the same time keeping the undesirable local behaviors in check? Through analysis of China's fiscal reforms, this paper suggests that the institutional advantageous position of the central government and its shrewd bargaining strategies played an important role in helping the central government maintain control over the fiscal system, inducing mutually acceptable outcomes for both the center and localities.
Fiscal Decentralization in China: A Literature Review
Understanding the logic of fiscal decentralization is pivotal to the next steps of fiscal reform. The first step is a retrospection of the literature and evidence accumulated in the field. As a typical transition economy with rapid and extensive devolution reforms, China is the ideal context to examine the causes, processes, and effects of fiscal decentralization, which will attract numerous academic endeavors, both domestic and abroad. However, the literature has not been fully reviewed and the evidence on fiscal decentralization remains mixed and inconclusive. This paper is a comprehensive review of the latest advancements in the area of fiscal decentralization in China over the past decades. The processes, characteristics, and measurements of fiscal decentralization are firstly reviewed and the antecedents and consequences of fiscal decentralization are then synthesized. The knowledge gap and avenues for future research are finally discussed with the ultimate goal of making knowledge about fiscal decentralization in China contributive, accumulative, and sustainable.
Off balance: the unintended consequences of fiscal federalism in China
Journal of Chinese Political Science, 2004
This paper argues that neither the developmental state nor the marketpreserving federalism models are applicable to contemporary China. Despite superficial similarities with elements of each model, the political economy of reform in China violates key assumptions and expectations in both. In contrast to the expectations of the developmental state model, the center has not systematically allocated credit to the most productive sectors of the economy; instead the latter has had to rely on informal finance. And in contrast to the expectations of market-preserving federalism, fiscal decentralization has lead to a host of unintended consequences at the local level-namely, the hoarding of off-budget revenues for public goods provision, reliance on informal finance for private sector development, and local protectionism. These unintended and informal coping strategies depart substantially from the core components of both the developmental state and market-preserving federalism models.
Fiscal Federalism, Fiscal Reform, and Economic Growth in China
2017
Though it has been recognized that political institutions and state capacity play an important role in determining economic outcomes, for most non-Western economies we still do not have granular enough historical knowledge as to how. Here we study a particular historical episode in the case of China, which, after a period of fiscal decentralization that has been credited with leading to historically unprecedented growth rates but significant fiscal decline, recentralized the collection of tax revenues. The economic and political consequences of this new Tax Sharing System (TSS) have been debated extensively given the interest on fiscal decentralization and its interaction with political institutions and economic outcomes. The central question in this debate has been whether the TSS constitutes a significant departure from decentralization with adverse effects on fiscal federalism or whether the recentralization under the TSS corrects for the overshooting in decentralization with ben...
Undermining State Capacity: Vertical and Horizontal Diffusions of Fiscal Power in China
Asian Politics & Policy, 2009
Since the late 1970s, China's fiscal system has facilitated the initiation and implementation of economic reforms and greatly contributed to China's remarkable economic achievements. However, weaknesses of the fiscal system have been exposed that have aroused concerns about the weakening of state capacity. While many have discussed the loss of central fiscal control over localities under decentralization and its negative consequences, not enough attention has been paid to another major problem: the diffusion of fiscal power to nonfiscal government departments. In this article, I argue that the existence of the extra-budgetary system has granted ad hoc taxation power to nonfiscal departments and led to the mismanagement of fiscal revenue. Compared with the vertical diffusion of fiscal power, i.e., the devolution of fiscal authority from central to lower-level governments, the horizontal diffusion of fiscal power is more difficult to control and more detrimental to the institutionalization of China's fiscal system.
Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in China
Economic Development and Cultural Change, 2000
In a simple model of endogenous growth with spending by different levels of government, we demonstrate how fiscal decentralization affects the long-run growth rate of the economy. Applying the model to the U.S. economy, we find that the existing spending shares for state and local governments have been consistent with growth maximization. In this sense, further decentralization in public spending may be harmful for growth. , and especially two referees and Jan Brueckner for comments, criticism, and suggestions. Any errors remain ours. † Mailing address: The World Bank, Room MC2-611,
China-ASEAN Perspective Forum, 2013
As the main part of intergovernmental relations, fiscal decentralization plays a crucial role in the process of regional economic growth in China. Chinese fiscal decentralization is a close integration of fiscal decentralization and political centralization. Based on such a perspective, this paper analyzes the characteristics of Chinese decentralization and its impact on the behaviour of government officials. Chinese-style fiscal decentralization with the special political promotion tournament model makes regional governments expand intergovernmental competition to chase a variety of economic factor endowments and then develop the local economy. Excessive centralization or excessive decentralization is not conducive to economic growth, so in theory there may be an optimal degree of fiscal decentralization. In accordance with the theory of fiscal decentralization and related literature, this paper selects a suitable method to measure China’s degree of fiscal decentralization at the level of the provinces and calculate to get the national overall degree of fiscal decentralization. The paper finds that China’s overall fiscal decentralization has been close to or has reached the optimal level. The eastern developed region has the highest degree of fiscal decentralization followed by the middle (central) region and the western region and the degrees of these three regions have a trend of convergence. As for the deviation that the speed of regional economic development does not match the degree of fiscal decentralization between the western region and the middle (central) region, this paper uses the cost of political promotion tournament to explain. It shows that China’s fiscal decentralization is not faced with the question of whether there should be further decentralization or centralization but should instead move towards completing or perfecting the systems, including a well-established political promotion tournament system. Through the standard, scientific, transparent and fair systems, fiscal decentralization can more easily play its positive function in regional economic growth. https://www.dropbox.com/s/qz6ajmbkz30tj5t/CAPF-v3n1-yeoh-wu-fiscaldecentralization.pdf
From the Helping Hand to the Grabbing Hand: Fiscal Federalism and Corruption in China
Helping and grabbing-hand models have been used to explain behavior of governments in transition economies. Russia has in particular been associated with the grabbing hand and behavior in China with the helping hand. In this paper we show using the evidence on China how grabbing and helping hand behavior is sensitive to revenue-sharing incentives in a fiscal federal structure. We propose a model of interaction between local and central government where the central government chooses the revenue-sharing rule and local government chooses between helping and grabbing hand behavior toward private economic activity in its jurisdiction. We formulate measures of the helping hand and grabbing hand, and apply the model using the measures to an empirical investigation of local-center fiscal relations. Empirical results confirm the predictions of the model of a change in China from helping to grabbing hand in the 1990s, and therefore indicate convergence in government behavior from the previously emphasized difference.
The tradeoff between growth and equity in decentralization policy: China's experience
Journal of Development Economics, 2008
This paper investigates the potential tradeoff between economic growth and regional equity in the design of fiscal decentralization policy in the context of China's experience. We develop a theoretical model of fiscal decentralization, where overall national economic growth and equity in the regional distribution of fiscal resources are the two objectives pursued by the central government. The model is tested using panel data for 1985-98. We find that fiscal decentralization in China has led to economic growth as well as to significant increases in regional inequality.