Distinguishing neural sources of movement preparation and execution:: An electrophysiological analysis (original) (raw)

Dissociating effector and movement direction selection during the preparation of manual reaching movements: Evidence from lateralized ERP components

Clinical Neurophysiology, 2007

Objective: The present study investigated whether lateralized ERP components triggered during covert manual response preparation (ADAN, LDAP) reflect effector selection, the selection of movement direction, or both. Methods: Event-related brain potentials were recorded during a response precueing paradigm where visual cues provided either partial (Experiment 1) or full (Experiment 2) information about the response hand and the direction for a subsequent reaching movement. Results: ADAN and LDAP components were elicited even when only partial response information was available, demonstrating that they do not require the presence of a fully specified motor program. The ADAN was elicited in a similar fashion regardless of whether effector or movement direction information was provided, suggesting that the underlying mechanisms are equally sensitive to both types of response-related information. In contrast, the LDAP was larger in response to cues providing effector information, but was also reliably present when movement direction was available. Conclusions: ADAN and LDAP components reflect preparatory activity within anterior and posterior parts of the parieto-premotor sensorimotor network where different parameters for manual reaching movements are programmed independently. Significance: These results support the claim of the premotor theory of attention that shared sensorimotor control mechanisms are involved in attention and motor programming.

On the equivalence of executed and imagined movements: Evidence from lateralized motor and nonmotor potentials

Human brain …, 2009

The neural simulation theory assumes that motor imagery and motor execution draw on a shared set of mechanisms underlying motor cognition. Evidence is accumulating that motor imagery and motor execution have many common features. The extent of the similarity and whether it spreads into the preparation phase is however unclear. This study used electroencephalographic recordings to compare the effects of providing advance information about upcoming movements on preparatory processing in a motor imagery and execution paradigm. Event-related potential data were recorded in a priming task where participants were cued to perform simple or complex finger movements. We hypothesized that a high degree of functional similarity of motor imagery and motor execution should be reflected in similar alterations of lateralized preparatory activity. Lateralized preparatory activity was indeed very similar, showing both motor-related (lateralized readiness potential, LRP) and cognitive components (anterior directing-attention negativity or ADAN, late directing-attention positivity or LDAP). Dipole analysis revealed that LRP, ADAN, and LDAP sources were very comparable for motor imagination and execution. Results generally support the idea of common underlying functional networks subserving both the preparation for execution and imagery of movements. They also provide a broader context for this notion by revealing similarities in cognitive components associated with the movement tasks.

Movement-related potentials associated with movement preparation and motor imagery

1996

Movement-related potentials (MRPs), reflecting cortical activity associated with voluntary movement, typically show a slowly increasing negative potential beginning between 1 and 2 s prior to movement, which most likely reflects motor preparatory processes. Studies of regional cerebral blood flow implicate the supplementary motor area in such preparatory processes; however, the contribution of the supplementary motor area to premovement activity observed in MRPs is debated. It is possible to examine MRPs relating to movement preparation alone, in the absence of movement execution, by recording MRPs associated with imagined movements. In this study, MRPs were recorded from 11 healthy control subjects while performing a sequential button-pressing task in response to external cues, and while imagining performance of the same task in response to the same cues. The early component of MRPs was found not to differ in amplitude, onset time, or topography when performing compared with imagining movement, indicating that both movement execution and motor imagery involve similar pre-movement preparatory processes generated in the same cortical area -most likely the supplementary motor area. It is therefore concluded that the early component of the MRP reflects activity arising predominantly from the supplementary motor area and is associated with pre-movement motor preparatory processes which occur relatively independently of actual movement execution.

Event-related potentials as a function of movement parameter variations during motor imagery and isometric action

Behavioural Brain Research, 2000

Neuroimaging and electrophysiological studies have shown that executed action and motor imagery activate common neuronal substrates, leading to the hypothesis that movement preparation and motor imagery are functionally equivalent processes. This study further tested the functional equivalence hypothesis by determining whether electrocortical patterns associated with variations in motor control parameters are similar during imagined and executed actions. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded from the supplementary motor/premotor area (SMA/PMA; FCz site) and primary motor area (M1; C3, C4 sites) during an executed and an imagined, cued, discrete isometric contraction task while target force (TF; low, moderate) and rate of force development (RFD; slow, rapid) were varied. For M1, the correlation of ERPs between moderate-and low force-executions was near zero and N2 amplitude was greater for moderate than low force executions, indicating that M1 activity is related to TF. Rapid executions were greater in amplitude and longer in latency than slow executions and the ERPs for rapid-and slow-executions were negatively correlated, indicating that M1 activity is also related to RFD. There were no differences in N2 amplitude and a zero correlation between execution and imagined actions of similar TF and RFD, indicating that neither TF or RFD are represented in M1 activity during imagery. For SMA/PMA, there was a moderate correlation between moderate-and low force-executions and larger N2 amplitude for moderate-than for low force-executions, indicating that TF may be related to SMA/PMA electrocortical activity. ERP patterns were uncorrelated between rapid-and slow-execution at FCz, but N2 amplitude was the same, making it unclear whether the RFD parameter is represented in FCz activity. The correlational and N2 amplitude analyses demonstrate that patterns of electrocortical activity at SMA/PMA are nearly isomorphic during executed and imagined actions as TF and RFD are varied. These results provide evidence that patterns of electrocortical activity associated with variations in the parameters of executed action are similar during motor imagery at SMA/PMA but not at M1.

Actual and mental motor preparation and execution: a spatiotemporal ERP study

Experimental Brain Research, 2004

Studies evaluating the role of the executive motor system in motor imagery came to a general agreement in favour of the activation of the primary motor area (M1) during imagery, although in reduced proportion as compared to motor execution. It is still unclear whether this difference occurs within the preparation period or the execution period of the movement, or both. In the present study, EEG was used to investigate separately the preparation and the execution periods of overt and covert movements in adults. We designed a paradigm that randomly mixed actual and kinaesthetic imagined trials of an externally paced sequence of finger key presses. Sixty channel event-related potentials were recorded to capture the cerebral activations underlying the preparation for motor execution and motor imagery, as well as cerebral activations implied in motor execution and motor imagery. Classical waveform analysis was combined with data-driven spatiotemporal segmentation analysis. In addition, a LAURA source localization algorithm was applied to functionally define brain related motor areas. Our results showed first that the difference between actual and mental motor acts takes place at the late stage of the preparation period and consists of a quantitative modulation of the activity of common structures in M1. Second, they showed that primary motor structures are involved to the same extent in the actual or imagined execution of a motor act. These findings reinforce and refine the functional equivalence hypothesis between actual and imagined motor acts.

Hemispheric Lateralization of Event-Related Brain Potentials in Different Processing Phases during Unimanual Finger Movements

Sensors, 2008

Previous functional MRI and brain electrophysiology studies have studied the left-right differences during the tapping tasks and found that the activation of left hemisphere was more significant than that of right hemisphere. In this study, we wanted to delineate this lateralization phenomenon not only in the execution phase but also in other processing phases, such as early visual, pre-executive and post-executive phases. We have designed a finger-tapping task to delineate the left-right differences of event related potentials (ERPs) to right finger movement in sixteen right handed college students. The mean amplitudes of ERPs were analyzed to examine the left-right dominance of cortical activity in the phase of early visual process (75-120ms), pre-execution (175-260ms), execution (310-420ms) and post-execution (420-620ms). In the execution phase, ERPs at the left electrodes were significantly more pronounced than those at the right electrodes (F3 > F4, C3 > C4, P3 > P4, O1 > O2) under the situation without comparing the central electrodes (Fz, Cz, Pz, and Oz). No difference was found between left and right electrodes in other three phases except the C3 electrode still showed more dominant than C4 in the pre-and post-execution phase. In conclusion, the phenomenon of brain lateralization occur major in the execution phase. The central area also showed the lateralization in the pre-and post-execution to demonstrate its unique lateralized contributions to unilateral simple finger movements. Sensors 2008, 8 2901

tion in Time course and distribution of movement-rela ted potentials in a movement precueing task

1996

In order to obtain direct information regarding the time course of movement preparation, we combined RT measurements in a movement precueing task with multi-channel recordings of movement-related potentials in the present study. Movements of the index and middle fingers of the left and right hand were either precued or not by advance information regarding the side (left or right hand) of the required response. Reaction times were slower for patients than for control subjects. Both groups benefited equally from informative precues, indicating that patients utilized the advance information as effectively as control subjects. Lateralization of the movement-preceding cerebral activity [i.e. the lateralized readiness potential (LRP)] confirmed that patients used the available partial information to prepare their responses and started this process no later than controls. In conjunction with EMG onset times, the LRP onset measures allowed for a fractionation of the RTs, which provided clues to the stages where the slowness of Parkinson's disease patients might arise. No definite abnormalities of temporal parameters were found, but differences in the distribution of the lateralized movementpreceding activity between patients and controls suggested differences in the cortical organization of movement preparation. Differences in amplitude of the contingent negative variation (CNV) and differences in the way in which the CNV was modulated by the information given by the precue pointed in the same direction. A difference in amplitude of the P300 between patients and controls suggested that preprogramming a response required more effort from patients than from control subjects.