Joint Response to the Deloitte Review of the Implementation of the Recommendations of the Royal Commission Into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody (original) (raw)
Related papers
30 years on: Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody recommendations remain unimplemented
2021
This paper outlines concerns with the 2018 Deloitte Access Economics review of the implementation of the 339 recommendations of the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody (RCIADIC). Here, we update a statement produced by Jordan et al. in December 2018, which argued that due to its scope and methodology, the Deloitte review had the potential to misrepresent the extent to which the RCIADIC recommendations had been implemented. Drawing on coronial inquest reports, we cite new evidence of the failure of governments to implement key RCIADIC recommendations and the fatal consequences for First Nations lives. We argue that there is a risk that misinformation may influence policy and practice responses to First Nations deaths in custody, and opportunities to address the widespread problems in Indigenous public policy in Australia may be missed. In particular, current approaches too often ignore the principles of self-determination and the realities of laws and policies as exper...
Submission to the Australian Law Reform Commission Inquiry into Indigenous Incarceration Rates
2017
The ongoing social injustices faced by Indigenous Australians comprise one of the greatest tragedies and failures of successive Australian governments. While commending the efforts of many individuals and institutions over the years in addressing this issue, including the Attorney- General in calling for this inquiry, we want to highlight that this area has been consistently and severely under-resourced both in a fiscal and culturally appropriate context. Australia has been built on the blood, sweat and tears of our Indigenous peoples. Our hospitals and public infrastructure have been funded by wages owed to unpaid Indigenous workers.1 And yet, First Nations peoples today are still not the primary agents behind many of the policies that affect them.
CRITICAL REFLECTIONS UPON AUSTRALIA'S ROYAL COMMISSION INTO ABORIGINAL DEATHS IN CUSTODY
Over a decade after the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody (RCIADIC) tabled its National Report, the report and its 339 recommendations are still cited whenever suggestions are made or policies are introduced which target the over-representation of Indigenous people in custody. It is therefore timely and relevant that its appropriateness in dealing with Indigenous over-representation, and with Indigenous marginalisation generally, be critically reassessed. In particular, there is a need to consider whether the investigative procedures undertaken by the RCIADIC and the political constraints surrounding its inception resulted in non-orthodox information and perspectives being excluded. This paper uses data collected from interviews with 48 people associated with the RCIADIC in order to critically reflect upon the way in which the inquiry was established and conducted to determine whether it was constrained in its ability to fully consider the problems confronting Indigenous Australians when dealing with the Australian justice system.
Futures, 2002
This article applies the futures research methodology called Causal Layered Analysis to the Australian Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody. Specifically the method is used to analyse the 339 recommendations of this Royal Commission that examined the causes of some 99 Aboriginal Deaths in Custody during the nine-year period from 1/1/1980. Spanning a generational period of 20 years, 10 of which since the multi million dollar Royal Commission and multi-multi million-dollar implementation process were put in place, aboriginal deaths in custody remain at the same rate. Conclusions are drawn about the inquiry, its inability to access deeper layers of cross-cultural causation and the separate implementation process. Further the failure of public administration in implementing the recommendations are also explored. Finally an 'act of recovery' is proposed to help us learn to prevent this happening again.
2008
CAEPR's principal objective is to undertake high-quality, independent research that will assist in furthering the social and economic development and empowerment of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people throughout Australia. Its aim is to be a world-class centre undertaking research on Indigenous economic development issues that combines academic excellence with policy relevance and realism. CAEPR is currently Australia's major dedicated research centre focusing on Indigenous economic and social policy from a national perspective. The Centre's publications, which include the CAEPR Discussion Paper series first established in 1991, aim to report on Indigenous circumstance, inform public debate, examine government policy, and influence policy formulation. CAEPR Discussion Papers are intended as one forum for the dissemination of peer-reviewed research by Centre staff. These papers are produced both electronically and in hard copy. Other CAEPR outputs include Research Monographs, Working Papers and Topical Issues. Copies of Discussion Papers, Working Papers and Topical Issues are available for free electronic download from CAEPR's website <www.anu.edu.au/caepr/>, while Research Monographs can be accessed via the ANU E Press website <www.epress.anu.edu.au>.
1999
and ANU. CAEPR's principal objective is to undertake high quality independent research that will assist in furthering the social and economic development and empowerment of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. CAEPR's mission is to be a world-class centre undertaking research on indigenous economic development issues that combine academic excellence with policy relevance and realism. In Australia, CAEPR is currently the only dedicated research centre focusing on indigenous economic policy issues from a national perspective: its publications, which include the CAEPR Discussion Paper series, aim to broadly evaluate government policy, influence policy formulation and inform rational debate. The Director of the Centre is responsible to the Vice-Chancellor of ANU and receives assistance in formulating the Centre's research priorities from an Advisory Committee consisting of senior academics nominated by the Vice-Chancellor and representatives nominated by ATSIC, the Department of Employment, Workplace Relations and Small Business and the Department of Family and Community Services. CAEPR Discussion Papers are intended as one forum for the rapid dissemination of refereed papers on research that falls within the CAEPR ambit. These papers are produced for discussion and comment within the research community and indigenous affairs public policy arena. Many are subsequently published in academic journals. Publications can be purchased from:
In search of an outstations policy for Indigenous Australians
2006
operated as a University Centre and is currently funded from a variety of sources including the ANU, Australian Research Council, industry partners, and the Department of Family, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs. CAEPR's principal objective is to undertake high-quality, independent research that will assist in furthering the social and economic development and empowerment of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people throughout Australia. Its aim is to be a world-class centre undertaking research on Indigenous economic development issues that combines academic excellence with policy relevance and realism. CAEPR is currently Australia's major dedicated research centre focusing on Indigenous economic and social policy from a national perspective. The Centre's publications, which include the CAEPR Working Paper series established in 1999, aim to report on Indigenous circumstance, inform public debate, examine government policy, and influence policy formulation.