Citizen Involvement in Planning Process Innovation (original) (raw)
Related papers
Experts’ comments on introduction of participatory tools in urban planning in Serbia
2014
New participation methods have been tested under the GIZ (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit GmbH) Project ‘’Strengthening of local land management in Serbia’’ within seven pilot projects in local communities during the year 2011/12. The main goal of the project was to introduce new market-oriented planning instruments. This paper presents initial results based on experiences from the project implementation and interviews with local planners engaged. Pilot projects are comprised of different scenarios of urban development planning. These were used to test involvement of stakeholders and citizen engagement in planning process of the new residential area, residential commercial zone, brownfield site development, new tourist area and urban renewal, inner city development and preparation of strategic environmental impact assessments (SEIA). They are concerned with both formal and informal planning procedures. One part of the project is focused on evaluation of expec...
Reflection on citizen participation process in policy decisions in Urban Planning (Albania case)
This essay makes a critical reflection of the increasing tendency to involve citizens in the process of decision-making in Urban Planning in Albania. On the next paragraphs there will be introduced the past and the present situation, and also the tendency of Albanian Government to embrace the civil involvement in policy decision and policy delivery processes in Urban Planning and land development at the same time.
Innovative Forms of Citizen Participation at the Fringe of the Formal Planning System
In the Nordic countries, we are witnessing a proliferation of novel and more experimental ways of citizen and authority interaction within the field of urban planning and governance. These formats are seen in urban regeneration projects and planning experiments that endorse more inclusive interactions between public authorities and local actors than in the traditional formal hearings. The intention of this article is to explore the potential of these forms of participation in contributing to social innovation particularly related to including citizens that are difficult to reach, and in creating new arenas for interaction and collaboration. Theoretically, the article is inspired by the concepts of social innovation, planning
Public Participation in Planning and in Practice
ECOWEEK Book #2: 15 Paths to Sustainability: from Innovation to Social Design, 2021
Public participation worldwide is becoming an integral part of the planning and decision-making process. Politicians, planners, architects, engineers and designers are starting to realize the benefits of unlocking the potential of public engagement in projects of public interest. Based on the author's experience in public participation of over one decade and his experience as an urban planner and public participation manager in the city of Jerusalem, Israel, we will attempt here to offer a short introduction to public participation, its characteristics and goals, its benefits, challenges and drawbacks, and some of the methodologies that apply to planning and sustainable design. We hope that this short introduction will open a window of curiosity for further reading and learning about how to work with the public, and not just for the public. The examples include public participation management at Ginot Ha’ir Community Council, one of the 27 community councils of the city of Jerusalem, Israel, as the city is undergoing an extensive process of urban renewal and infrastructure upgrade. The examples also include public participation engagement at the ECOWEEK sustainable design workshops, where sustainable design is learned and practiced by architecture and design students, often engaged in participatory design with the public for the first time. Citations: Messinas, E. (2021). "Public Participation in Planning", in Messinas, E., Kouinoglou, D. (ed.). (2021). "ECOWEEK Book #2: 15 Paths to Sustainability: from Innovation to Social Design", Athens, 62-69 Messinas, E.(2021). "Participatory Design and Public Participation in Practice", in "Messinas, E., Kouinoglou, D. (ed.). (2021). "ECOWEEK Book #2: 15 Paths to Sustainability: from Innovation to Social Design", Athens, 70-77
2003
Reconstruction of the towns with an aim to reduce pollution and mitigate the conflict of resources usage and possibilities of their renewal will be a critical planning problem of the new millenium. These problems cannot be solved only by professionals and experts. They require some methods that combine technical with economic and natural sciences on one side, and an intensive and active participation of a wide range of participants on the other. And this, of course, assumes a number of different and often opposing perspectives (Doyle and Batty, 1998). On the other hand, it has long since been known that this rapid development of information and communication technologies (ICT), especially Internet, presents a global phenomenon affecting various aspects of human life, which is of special interest for this research and for the planning of a sustainable community development. According to the opinion of theoreticians and promoters of interactive and collaborative planning (Foreseter, 1...
Participatory planning in the urban development of post-socialist Serbia
2018
In recent decades (especially in the most developed parts of the world), researchers, urban decision makers, planning managers and politicians are devoting much greater attention to the opinion of the local population, as long-term experience has shown that meaningful, integrated, interactive and continuous public involvement in decision making will increase the quality, legitimacy, and overall social, economic and environmental efficiency of a planned development. Especially in more developed democratic societies, citizens are demanding and gaining more power in decision making, and at the same time they have much more influence in planning the development of their own urban environment. This is also being supported through the development of related legislation (hard and soft laws), and traditional/formal and new/informal instruments that have particularly been enabled by the development of ICT. After explaining the contextual factors, this research will provide a brief historical...
International scientific conference "Environmental impact of illegal construction, poor planning and design" - CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS , 2019
Urban development should, ideally, take into consideration public interest, and be based on principles of sustainability. The urban planning process needs to be transparent and should include public participation in the early stages, which, however, is not the case in Montenegro. This leads to the degradation of the urban and natural environment, as evidenced in the case of planning for a kindergarten in the southern Montenegrin municipality of Bar. This paper analyses the case of a fraught planning process that resulted in cutting down a hundred years old cypress park with more than 90 trees, a devastated schoolyard, and months of massive civic protests, all of which ended with the government withdrawing the original plan. The paper examines the reasons for and the consequences of failure to conduct adequate public participation in the contemporary planning process. The architectural organization KANA/ko ako ne arhitekt had an active role in supporting the citizens in their initiative to protect the natural heritage and assert the right to actively participate in the planning of their neighborhood. Applied research consisting of gathering and analyzing the available documentation (urban plans, government decisions, tenders, projects, laws and regulations, land proprietorships, bank loan environmental policies) was conducted, and continual clarification of the planning procedure was provided, so that the activists could find constructive ways to participate in it. Involvement in the process allowed an insight into the formation of ‘Cypress Revolution’ – the bottom-up urban movement seeking to examine, clarify and improve the planning process by asserting the importance of public participation. The results of this research show how the implications of neglecting public input and public interest can be disastrous for the community, the urban environment, and the quality of the planning process in general. The conclusion is that meaningful, well-timed, well-structured, and transparent public participation is an essential part of successful urban planning, the goal of which should be to create inclusive and sustainable cities.
A Novel Discussion on Urban Planning Practice: Citizen Participation
In the age of modern democracy, citizen participation process, including all types, is assumed as a major feature of policy, decisionmaking and urban planning fields. Commonly, the process of participation is considered as fundamental to the involvement of citizens in decision-making process in contemporary planning milieu. Since the late 1950s, the role of participation in urban planning practices has become larger and expanding; and after the communicative turn in urban planning theory it is now one of the influential topics of planning agenda. Because participatory processes have become popular and widely used in planning practices from local to national levels; achieving a comprehensible understanding of the theory, objectives, history, of citizen participation process in planning have become vigorous for planners of today. Located within the context described above, the basic concern of this paper is to expand our
Active Citizenship in the Planning Process: Information Management vs. Creative Participation
Migration statistics assume that, by the year 2020 Hamburg's population will grow to over 1.8 million inhabitants. This translates to a demand for 5000 to 6000 more residences per year. To meet these new developments and demands of the residential, professional and leisure sectors, the district of Altona has designed a future plan intended to begin weighing the various development options.[1] The aim of the future plan for Altona is to provide all of the citizens and participants with a platform to inform about future developments. The intention is to ensure widespread participation of the citizens without citing specific goals. This research project analyzes methods of citizen involvement in construction planning processes in Hamburg and attempts to identify new approaches to qualitative social research.
The Role of Public Participation in Promoting Urban Planning
American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 2021
Each city has important and essential needs, which due to the development of modern cities, these needs occur despite to urban planning science. Future generation expectation of resources should also be consideredand urban planning should be defined and established based on participatory urbanization and citizen participation. The presence of citizens in decision-making and expressing their desire and needs in accordance with the current conditions of the community occurs in participatory urbanization. Participation has found a special place in urban planning theories. In today's world, people's participation goes on like political, social, economic, and so on. Planners make better use of popular forces to achieve a better society. This article tries to recall the planning process and the position of planners and also uses a descriptive and comparative method to express the important theories of participatory urban development, such as the theory of Sherry Arnstein and Scott Davidson.