The Strategy of Counterattacking in Romanian Political Discourse (original) (raw)
Related papers
Facets of the Indirect Attack in the First Televised Debate Klaus Iohannis - Victor Ponta.docx
Without any political bias whatsoever, the present article analyses a recent Romanian election debate, that between the incumbent President, Klaus Iohannis, and his opponent at the time, Victor Ponta, with a view to winning the 2014 presidential elections. The analysis looks into a strategy that frequently appears in political communication, the indirect attack, which has the advantage of conveying a strong message without putting the speaker at risk. Out of the multiple facets that the indirect attack may present, the paper focuses on irony, questions, as well as the apparently neutral assumptions that both speakers make about themselves and the opponent, in order either to assert themselves and gain legitimacy, or to undermine the interlocutor's position. These strategies are used repeatedly by both participants in an attempt to make the antagonist appear unprepared, opportunistic, unreliable and corrupt in the eyes of potential electors.
THE POWER OF LANGUAGE IN THE ROMANIAN POLITICAL DISCOURSE
Land Forces Academy Review, 2023
The impact of communication upon political activities is inevitable, regardless whether we refer to socialization, participation, the establishment of an agenda, mobilization or negotiation. Every political activity is influenced by communication inasmuch as almost all such manifestations involve the use of a form of communication. The assertion of a moral and professional authority's competence and credibility is increasingly rivaled by media credibility or by the charisma, whose importance is admitted by journalists and image counselors. Thus, it is by means of their aggressive discourse that most of the Romanian political leaders have built up this 'charisma'. In a period of crisis and shortcomings, who could wish to see faded characters, deprived of personality, on television? In Romania, not revolting against 'someone' and not opposing them are equivalent to being unaware of the people's sufferance and, therefore, one cannot be a good leader.
VERBAL AGGRESSIVENESS IN THE ROMANIAN PARLIAMENTARY DEBATE. PAST AND PRESENT 1
The paper intends to present, from a pragma-rhetorical point of view, the main marks of the verbal aggressiveness, as revealed in the parliamentary debates, with reference to certain rhetorical and argumentative choices. The data are represented by several Romanian parliamentary debates, ranging from 1866 until nowadays. The present approach questions the difference in the verbal aggressiveness, by comparing the early Romanian parliamentary debates and the present-day ones. It is true that, throughout the parliamentary interaction, the indirectness softens the verbal attacks of the MPs, but the degree of indirectness is highly variable. The paper focuses on the rhetorical devices and on insults, the latter directed either at the adversary's person or at his/her discourse. The comments point out some frequent cases of fallacies. In the authors' opinion, impoliteness, sometimes rudeness, in the debates, could be revealed by studying the way other MPs and other debates are evaluated and staged.
2013
From a discourse analysis standpoint, the contemporary administrativist approach and the discursive perspectives on the concept of "public interest" were brought together by Jacques , as the deconstruction of discourse provides the researcher with the opportunity to identify the meaning or the purpose of discourse, having as starting point the meanings assigned by society to specific words or concepts. Consequently, the priority axis of our analysis revolves around the intentionality of political discourse, based on the assumption that the three basic elements (cf. Derrida) of discourse are intention, method and ideology, with public interest being a prerequisite for the democratic public sphere. The issue of discourse intentionality is the subject of pragmatic approach, as intentionality essentially defines the manner in which a discourse agent represents a specific matter (cf. ; it is thus understood in the context that the force of representation is intrinsic to the intentionality process of speech acts. The second core dimension specific to our study encompasses the social conditions which characterise the use of words/concepts, and the role played by the latter in determining discourse effectiveness, starting from the paradigm of illocutionary force (cf. J.-P. Austin, 1969Austin, , 1975 as well as from the significance of discourse context in relation with the paradigmatic competences of "the language of institution" or "authorized language" (cf. P. Bourdieu, 1975Bourdieu, /2001. In practical terms, our study is concerned with the occurrences and manners of (re)presentation which are specific to the syntagm "public interest" in the context of deliberative discourse; thus, our study comprises an analysis of the political debates in the joint meetings of the Parliament of Romania between January-December 2012 -i.e. 24 meetings -and seeks to identify operational definitions for the syntagm concerned.
The Language of Romanian Politics: Reifying the Other
Messages, Sages and Ages, 2016
The dominant ideology of a society seems to possess the means to infiltrate an individual's conscience with relative ease. From the perspective of the functions of language, we intend to investigate those fundamental characteristics of the ideological discourse that reify the left-right dichotomy in Romanian politics.
The Romanian Parliamentary Discourse: Tradition and Modernity. A Pragma-Rhetorical Approach
2011
The Romanian Parliamentary Discourse: Tradition and Modernity. A PragmaRhetorical Approach is an exploratory research project, included in the program IDEAS (code 2136/2008) and sponsored by the National Council for Scientific Research in the Higher Education System (in Romanian: CNCSIS). Directed by Liliana Ionescu-Ruxăndoiu, the research team includes five specialists, four linguists: Andra Vasilescu, Ariadna Ştefănescu, Melania Roibu, Mihaela-Viorica Constantinescu, and a historian: Silviu Hariton. The team is in a permanent contact with two young political scientists: Irina Ionescu and Todor Arpad. The project started in 2009 and will be finished in 2011. The project is dealing with the description and analysis of the evolution of the Romanian parliamentary discourse (PD) as an institutional discourse genre, from its beginnings up to the present, from an interdisciplinary perspective. Its guidelines are given by an assumption largely accepted by specialists in complementary fiel...
Ad hominem and false analogy abuses in a Romanian intellectual debate
ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal, Krakow , 2022
A pragma-dialectical inside view of a Romanian intellectual debate is meant to unveil strategic maneuvering and fallacies, in a public sphere said to be dominated by ‘status groups’, ‘backstage maneuvers’ and ‘conspiracy’. A book written by a Romanian author sparked off an area of disagreement leading to ad hominem attacks and false analogies ranging from post-communist issues to political correctness.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 149, 2014
After Romania`s adhesion to the European Union, in 2007, the discursive actor Europe acquires new dimensions in Romanian political debates. This paper analysis the way Romanian political discourse uses the previous metaphors on Europe, in order to place European Union in the national political context. The methodological framework of this paper focuses on political discourse analysis, having as starting point an exhaustive corpus of Parliamentary debates between 2007 and 2013. The transversal aim of our study is to identify different hypostasis of Europe in Romanian political discourse and to classify associated European terms and concepts that define the way contemporary Romanian political discourse relates to Europe.
Lights, Camera, Action! How the 2009 Romanian Presidential Debates Portrayed Political Candidates
In the last two decades, the concept of public sphere has reached international academic debates, its meanings have constantly changed and have been adapted to various domains. Particularly, in media studies, the question that needs to be addressed is this: to what extent the public sphere represents an arena of deliberative communication and equal access, as Jürgen Habermas had envisaged it? Thus, many authors claim that the mediated public sphere provided by television today no longer values the aforementioned elements, leading to its dissolution. However, the meanings of this concept have been constantly reviewed, which requires a more careful consideration of this claim. Hence, the paper aims at understanding how the initial criteria of the public sphere have been assessed by academics in order to develop a personal definition of the concept.