A New Archaeology in the New Deal: The Rise of Historical Archaeology in the 1930s (original) (raw)

A BRIEF HISTORY OF HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY IN THE UNITED STATES

Editor’s note: In examining this issue, we discovered an inadvertent typographical error in the Pykles article indicating Cotter’s class was first offered in “the 1966–67 academic year” (p. 33). This should have read “1960–61,” which is when Cotter first offered “Problems and Methods in of Historical Archaeology.” The source for this information is: Schuyler, Robert L., 2003, The Second Largest City in the English-Speaking World: John L. Cotter and the Historical Archaeology of Philadelphia, 1960– 1999. In Philadelphia and the Development of Americanist Archaeology, edited by D. D. Fowler and D. R. Wilcox, pp. 156–164. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa. We apologize for the error

People with history: An update on historical archaeology in the United States

Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 1994

Historical archaeology has expanded greatly in the past decade. This essay discusses some of the trends and themes that have become important in historical archaeology in the United States since 1982. The first section briefly assesses the field. The second discusses capitalism as one theme thatmay serve to unify research. Cross-cultural research, integrative analyses, and the concepts of power and ideology are central to this theme. The third section is a brief case study concerning the historic Cherokee. The conclusion comments on the institutional state of historical archaeology.

The Future of American Archaeology

Advances in Archaeological Practice

ABSTRACTOver the past several years, we have seen many attacks on publicly funded and mandated archaeology in the United States. These attacks occur at the state level, where governors and state legislatures try to defund or outright eliminate state archaeological programs and institutions. We have also seen several attacks at the federal level. Some members of Congress showcase archaeology as a waste of public tax dollars, and others propose legislation to move federally funded or permitted projects forward without consideration of impacts on archaeological resources. These attacks continue to occur, and we expect them to increase in the future. In the past, a vigilant network of historic preservation and archaeological organizations was able to thwart such attacks. The public, however, largely remains an untapped ally. As a discipline, we have not built a strong public support network. We have not demonstrated the value of archaeology to the public, beyond a scattering of educatio...

Archaeology in 1992: A Perspective on the Discipline from the Society for American Archaeology Annual Meeting Program

American Antiquity, 1992

A survey of presentations at recent Society for American Archaeology annual meetings (1983, 1991, and 1992) is taken to examine the state of American archaeology. Roughly 80 percent of the presentations focus on New World archaeology, and between 60 and 80 percent are concerned with the last 3,000 years. In the last 10 years, there has been a slight shift away from subsistence and production studies to a greater concern with settlement and regional systems, sociopolitical organization, and public archaeology. A major trend has been increased participation by women.