Employees ’ Break-offs and the Birth of Industrial Clusters 1 In (original) (raw)
Empirical observation suggests that several industrial clusters originate from employees who break off and locate their new firms close to former employers. The reasons for such a choice are complex and include a variety of costs’ considerations. We present a two-player three-stage simultaneous game with interdependent decisions concerning break-offs, deterrent compensations, location, and profit maximizing production outputs. The structure of the game explains under what conditions a break-off is desirable, what location’s choice makes it optimal, and why the break-off process may lead to the birth of a cluster. We demonstrate how changes in a firm’s marginal production/congestion cost, the level of R&D investment in a region, and market size, all influence the likelihood of break-offs and their subsequent location decisions. Our results provide a rationale for why, in industries in which technology plays a significant role, an increase in R&D investment in the region may encourage...
Sign up to get access to over 50M papers
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
Related papers
Labour pooling, labour poaching, and spatial clustering
Regional Science and Urban Economics, 2006
When firms cluster in the same local labor market, they face a trade-off between the benefits of labor pooling (i.e., access to workers whose knowledge help reduce costs) and the costs of labor poaching (i.e., loss of some key workers to competition and the indirect effect of a higher wage bill to retain the others). We explore this trade-off in a duopoly game. Depending on market size and on the degree of horizontal differentiation between products, we characterize the strategic choices of firms regarding locations, wages, poaching and prices. Our results show that co-location, although it is always efficient, is not in general the equilibrium outcome.
Boschma, R. (2015) Do spinoff dynamics or agglomeration externalities drive industry clustering? A reappraisal of Steven Klepper’s work, Industrial and Corporate Change, doi: 10.1093/icc/dtv024.
Klepper’s theory of industry clustering based on organizational reproduction and inheritance through spinoffs challenged the Marshallian view on industry clustering. The paper provides an assessment of Klepper’s theoretical and empirical work on industry clustering. We explore how ‘new’ his spinoff theory on industry clustering was, and we investigate the impact of Klepper’s theory on the economic geography community. Klepper’s work has inspired especially recent literature on regional branching that argues that new industries grow out of and recombine capabilities from local related industries. Finally, the paper discusses what questions on industry location are still left open or in need of more evidence in the context of Klepper’s theory.
The locational implications of management and production fragmentation
Estudos Econômicos (São Paulo)
The main purpose of the work is to provide a theoretical link between the location decision and the internal organization of firms. In the simulation presented, (1) communication costs within the firm and (2) managerial structures affect both the production fragmentation process and the economic specialization of cities. More specifically, as either communication costs diminish or managerial structures become more flexible, manufacturing plants tend to move from the big city to medium cities, whereas headquarters and business services tend to agglomerate in the metropolitan area. The introduction of the internal organization of firms into the model, an aspect that is not modeled by Jones-Kierzkowski's approach, allows this article to formalize some empirical evidences pointed out by the literature.
Journal of Business Venturing, 2013
Are all startups similarly affected by the survival benefits and drawbacks of locating in geographic clusters? In this paper, we argue that prior theorizing may have missed important contingencies that affect whether a startup experiences the benefits and costs of locating in a cluster. In particular, while the local levels of skilled labor, suppliers, and purchasers have a beneficial influence and local competition has a detrimental influence on startup survival, these relationships are moderated by heterogeneity in firms' resources and capabilities. We find support for these arguments using a dataset covering the early life of all independent startups in the Canadian manufacturing sector from 1984 to 1998.
Series 13-11 Industrial dynamics and clusters : a survey
2013
We review the literature on clusters and their effects on entry, exit and growth of firms as well on the evolutionary dynamics underlying the process of cluster formation. Our extensive review shows that there is strong evidence that clusters promote entry, but little evidence that clusters enhance firm growth and firm survival. The emergence of clusters is best understood as an evolutionary process of capability transmission between parent firms and their spinoffs, rather than as an outcome of localisation economies that would increase the performance firms in clusters compared to firms outside clusters. From a number of open questions we distil various future research avenues stressing the importance of understanding firm heterogeneity and the exact mechanisms underlying localisation economies.
Labour Market Dynamics and Industrial Clusters: an Ecological Based Approach
2004
The paper investigates the role of labour flows in determining the growth of industrial clusters (defined as a combination of industries and spatial areas). Within an ecological approach the role of inter and intra industry -as well as of inter and intra cluster -interactions is theoretically modelled and empirically tested. This approach is enriched with other economic perspectives in order to take into account the effect of workers' migration flows and its skill composition. The empirical evidence shows that industry specific behaviours and territorial peculiarities are crucial in determining the employment dynamics. In particular, empirical evidence from 50 US states and 80 3-digits NAICS industries are able to show that employment flows play different role on local wages according to industrial characteristics (within services the main distinction arise between services to production and to persons); within manufacturing industries between labour intensive and capital intensive activities). A final section drawing some policy suggestion from the above analysis concludes the paper.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.