A question of primacy? Japan, Australia and the future of the United States in Asia (original) (raw)
Related papers
Review of China’s Rise and Australia–Japan–US Relations Primacy and Leadership in East Asia
Malaysian Journal of International Relations, 2022
BOOK REVIEW Heazle, M. & O'Neil, A. (Eds.). (2018). China's Rise and Australia-Japan-US Relations: Primacy and Leadership in East Asia. Edward Elgar, 296pp. William Jones a This edited volume brings together eleven academics across eleven chapters to investigate Australian and Japanese perspectives and perceptions of American security engagement in East Asia. The central focus of the book is twofold: how do these two regional powers perceive their relationship with America in the wider East Asian region, and how is China's rapid rise altering the security relationship between and among these longtime American allies.
The Paradoxes of Paramountcy: Regional Rivalries and the Dynamics of American Hegemony in East Asia
Global Change, Peace & Security, 2003
In the 1970s and 1980s a number of observers argued that the United States had entered a phase of irreversible decline, in which its economy would not only be overtaken by Japan's, 2 but would prove incapable of underwriting its strategic ambitions. 3 Yet, by the end of the 1990s, following the collapse of the Soviet Union and the seemingly terminal demise of socialism as an alternative to capitalism, to say nothing of the East Asian financial crisis and the remarkable renaissance of the US economy, pessimism was replaced by triumphalism, 4 and expectations about the rise of Asia were eclipsed by visions of a new American century. American observers and strategists routinely talked of a new 'unipolar moment' in which American power was set to enjoy an unrivalled and enduring position of dominance at the heart of a broadly supported, stable international order. 5 The new millennium, however, has witnessed yet another reassessment of America's position.
Recently, the nature of the presence of the US in the Asia-Pacific has undergone significant changes. At least three developments-the rise of an economically and militarily resurgent China, a renewed counter-strategic approach by the US to rebalance its engagements with its close regional allies like Japan, the Philippines, South Korea and Australia, and the US' efforts to expand and extend strategic cooperation with India and Vietnam-show that there are new emerging differences between the US and its four major non-NATO allies in the Asia-Pacific. These developments point towards declining strategic reciprocity of these nation states with the US and vice versa as they seek relative autonomy in their engagements with Beijing along with other extra-regional powers. While this has tacitly mandated the expansion of the US alliance system from the core Asia-Pacific region westwards to include the Indo-Pacific, the Indian Ocean and a few other Southeast Asian nations, it has also depicted the insufficiency of the US' alliance with non-NATO allies in meeting its somewhat altered regional objectives since the turn of the century.
Towards a Pacific Community? The United States and Regional Leadership
This article addresses questions that are related to two recently proposed concepts: Hugh White’s Concert of Asia and Henry Kissinger’s Pacific Community. First, what basis is there for the US as a non-Asian country to pursue a lasting leadership role in East Asia? Second, what would it mean for the US to treat China as a security partner in East Asia on an equal basis, and is there any prospect that it might do so in the future? And third, if the US were to accept China as a partner and an equal power in the region, how would it then redefine its relations with its many military allies and strategic partners in a way that reflects this? As China becomes stronger, the United States eventually is likely to face a choice between an increasingly dangerous strategy of confrontation and various degrees of accommodation. With regard to East Asia, the form of accommodation that would be the most beneficial one for the US would be the sharing of regional leadership with China on an equal and stable basis. As a non- Asian country, the United States can only hope to achieve this by betting strongly on regional multilateralism.
From the Asia-Pacific to the Indo-Pacific Expanding Sino-U.S. Strategic Competition
As a pivotal region, the Indo-Pacific has become the power center of world geopolitics. China is actively working on strengthening win-win cooperation and inter-connectivity within the region. Toward this goal, it has launched the “Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)” from which all regional countries can benefit. From the geopolitical perspective, however, the United States has perceived growing challenge from China and is determined to maintain global supremacy by continuing to increase its military presence in the Indo-Pacific and enhancing its quadrilateral strategic cooperation with Japan, Australia and India. After the Obama administration’s “Rebalancing” efforts to sustain U.S. leadership in the Asia-Pacific by strengthening political, security and economic ties with regional countries, the Trump administration puts much emphasis on the security aspect of its Indo-Pacific strategy under the “America First” doctrine, and this is proving to be rather unwelcome among regional countries.
Asian Affairs: An American Review, 2019
This article challenges the simplistic view that U.S. leadership in East Asia is weakening relative to China's increasing ability to shape the regional order, which will force other states to choose between these two powers. Based on interviews with political elites, analysts, and academics in the United States, China, Japan, and Indonesia, we argue that the East Asian order transition is more complex and nuanced, especially when we examine views toward: (1) the Sino-U.S. rivalry for regional leadership; (2) whether Chinese initiatives such as the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank and the Belt and Road Initiative disrupt the current order; and (3) the preferred vision of regional order for each of the four countries. While there is hardly a consensus view about issues of regional order, it appears that in the short to medium term, China is not expected to substantially overhaul the existing East Asian order. Nevertheless, Beijing is likely to chip away at U.S. regional leadership and, in the long term, would presumably seek to create an order
The US Rebalance Policy and the Management of Power Politics in Asia Pacific
Journal of ASEAN Studies, 2014
The policy was introduced by the U.S. President Barack Obama early in his first administration in 2010, marked specific changing to the U.S. foreign policy like never before. The U.S. continuously views South and South East Asia, including the Indian Ocean, as a crucial driver for America’s economic growth and prosperity throughout the 21st century. Numerous numbers of cooperation and partnership have been done to enhance the ties between the U.S. and the regions. The U.S. presence and involvement in most essential regional meetings and summits can also be seen as an effort to seek opportunities, politically, economically, as well as security. This article tries to analyze how the U.S. rebalance towards Asia policy, a term used for the U.S.' foreign policy influenced the regional stability in Asia-Pacific region.
Emerging Us-Japan Relations and Impact on East Asian Security
Margalla Papers
States with shared interests and values may form a collective identity to enact their vision and achieve security objectives against those they view as threats. Similarly, US-Japan relations have progressed for a long, not just due to the dangers posed by China and North Korea but because of their shared values of democracy, human rights, peace, and global prosperity. They share the vision of a Free and Open Indo-Pacific by forming bilateral and multilateral alliances. The US and Japan are also engaged in strategic partnerships for traditional and non-traditional security in the region, including maritime, cyber, space, and energy. This paper, therefore, focuses on East Asia due to its vulnerable security architecture and explores how the US and Japan’s security cooperation strengthens regional security by sharing values and security concerns. It highlights that the potential of both states to form a collective identity may improve the security situation in East Asia. Bibliography...