Istanbul Next Wave and Other Turkish Art Exhibits: From Governance of Culture to Governance through Culture (original) (raw)
Related papers
Turkey in Global Art Scene: Dual Narratives in Politics of International Exhibitions
This paper aims to analyze Turkish visual culture after the 1980s through international exhibitions. Heritage and contemporary art exhibitions reflect the cosmopolitan vision of modern Turkey in global art scene. Today, these exhibitions convey ideas, ideologies and cultural vision of the state transform representational identity of the country. This study is a review of my Ph.D thesis which was written in Bogazici University Ataturk Institute for Modern Turkish history ask crucial questions on Turkish cultural policy in terms of international exhibition and formation of post-modern visual culture.
Artists participating in the 15th Istanbul biennial in Turkey
New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 2018
The Istanbul Foundation for Culture and Arts has been organising the Istanbul Biennial since 1987. The biennial aims to create a meeting point in İstanbul in the field of visual arts between artists from diverse cultures and the audience. The 14 biennials that İKSV has organised up to now have enabled the formation of an international cultural network between local and international art circles, artists, curators and art critics by bringing together new trends in contemporary art every 2 years. Curated by the artist duo Elmgreen and Dragset, the Istanbul Biennial exhibited works by 56 artists from 32 countries which discuss the concepts of house, neighborhood and belonging under the title 'a good neighbour'. The works of the nine Turkish artists participated in the 15th Istanbul Biennial are included in this review. A descriptive study in the screening model, the data of the report, was obtained by scanning the source.
The Istanbul Modern Art Museum: An Urban Regeneration Project?
European Planning Studies, 2013
In the 2000s, contemporary art institutions have flourished in Istanbul. New museums (mostly private) and art galleries have been created; biennials and fairs of contemporary art have attracted a growing number of visitors. To what extent could this fostering of culture be linked with the "Bilbao effect"? To what extent are the promoters of these cultural investments betting on economic development and urban regeneration through these projects? Focusing on the Istanbul Modern Art Museum (IM), this article analyses the process of its creation and its potential impact on its environment. It argues that the development of culture investments in modern arts in Turkey is mainly due to the private initiatives of large industrial groups and the wealthiest families, most of the time with political support. More than the expected economic impact of cultural investments, the main reason for these public-private collaborations is the symbolic dimension that contemporary art provides to a country which strives to be perceived as modern, developed and European. From the IM to Istanbul European Capital of Culture 2010, cultural investments are a means of strengthening an international image in the context of the "membership" negotiations between "Turkey and the European Union".
International Journal of Middle East Studies, 2023
Since its conception in 1937, Istanbul Museum of Painting and Sculpture has reflected the political, art historical, and economic structures of its time. Following years of preservation hazards, decades-long closures, and management crises, the museum has recently opened to the public once again. With its politicized and recently gentrified physical location in the historically commercial neighborhood of Karaköy, numerous restoration and conservation issues around its vast and poorly maintained collection, and the gaps its absence leaves in the art history of Turkey, the museum embodies many issues at the heart of Sarah-Neel Smith's Metrics of Modernity: Art and Development in Postwar Turkey, which serves as the subject of the book's epilogue. The museum's current and "semiperipheral" status is positioned as a question of Turkey's artistic futurity, as the author traces the convoluted patterns of Turkey's art scene in the mid-twentieth century over the course of four chapters. The convergence of economic, artistic, and political spheres, namely, the country's fragile economic market, its transition into a multiparty democracy, and artistic experimentation with tradition, means that Smith is also largely telling a story of obsolescence. Indeed, Smith chooses to thematize places that have ceased to exist today or have taken on new, often diminished, forms. The intersections of state control, ownership, and private enterprise are at the center of contemporary political discourse, and their centrality to Metrics of Modernity adds a significant contribution to modern and contemporary Turkish art history. Importantly, Smith demonstrates how mid-twentieth-century Turkey's contested political and economic past translates to its art institutional models, a connection that has often remained overlooked in contemporary scholarship. Smith primarily focuses on the socioeconomic modernization and artistic modernisms of Turkey in the 1950s. This decade in Turkey's political and economic history marks the country's integration into an American-instigated capitalist free market, shifting from statedriven economic policies to private enterprise and the rise of individual consumption, which are what Smith deems the "metrics" of modernity. Drawing on a wide array of sources, from close readings of artworks and art criticism to theories of public policy and economics, Smith analyzes the modes of artistic production and consumption in Turkey. The main protagonists of the book, Adalet Cimcöz, Bülent Ecevit, Aliye Berger, and Füreya Koral, appear almost in every chapter, articulating an interwoven narrative on the confined institutional networks and shared missions ascribed to the artists of postwar Turkey. Artists were treated as active agents of development, responsible for not only representing but fostering economic advancement. They "pursued interlinked questions of art and development in line with the priorities of the midcentury era, driven by a new and pressing question: How were they to continue developing the Turkish cultural sphere as their country repositioned itself in the international political landscape of the postwar period?" (p. 22). The newly burgeoning private art institutions and events in the mid-twentieth century find a parallel, even connected, counterpart in Turkey's economic experimentation. The