Working with scenarios, risk assessment and capabilities in the national safety and security strategy of the netherlands (original) (raw)
Related papers
National Risk Assessment in The Netherlands
Nowadays, National Safety and Security issues receive much attention in many countries. In 2007, the Dutch government approved a National Safety and Security Strategy based on a multi-criteria analysis approach to classify potential threats and hazards. The general methodology of this Dutch National Risk Assessment and the specific multi-criteria-based approach developed for it are presented in this paper. Five issues are discussed here: the objectives, requirements and criteria of the risk assessment; the multi-criteria methods used; the pluralistic weighting approach; the sensitivity and robustness analyses; and the outcomes of the Dutch National Risk Assessment.
Risk Assessment in the Netherlands
1997
The Dutch approach to risk assessment is defined in the National Plan for Environmental Protection Policy (NMP) of 1988. The goal is the present and future protection of humans, animals, plants, the ecosystem, and property through measures designed to provide for a sustainable development. The safety goals are defined in "Premises for Risk Management," an annex to the NMP, in 1989.
Focal Report 5 - Risk Analysis: Using Scenarios to Assess Risks
"Author(s): Myriam Dunn Cavelty, Elgin Brunner, Jennifer Giroux, Christoph Doktor, Gabriel Brönnimann Series: Risk and Resilience Reports Publisher(s): Center for Security Studies (CSS), ETH Zurich Date: 2012/09/03 Publication Year: 2012 This report aims to shed some light on the interrelationship between (different types of) scenarios and risk assessment by looking more closely at risk management approaches in Denmark, the Netherlands, Germany and the United Kingdom. In turn, it aims to develop a more nuanced understanding of the value and limits of scenarios in risk assessment.: Myriam Dunn Cavelty, Elgin Brunner, Jennifer Giroux, Christoph Doktor, Gabriel Brönnimann"
Safety Science, 2016
Introduction of the concept of risk within safety science in The Netherlands focussing on the years 1970-1990 Word count: 13.880, clean text ex summary and refs: 11.591 Summary 1. Introduction 2. Materials and methods 3. The period up to 1970: the emergence of the concept of risk 2.1 Operations research 2.2 Reliability engineering 2.3 Risks of flooding 2.4 Risks and nuclear energy 2.5 Risks in process safety 4. The seventies and eighties: quantification of risks in The Netherlands 4.1 The need for a quantitative approach 4.2 The concept of risk in the process and nuclear industries 4.3 Debating quantitative risk analysis in separate disciplines 4.4 LPG integral study 4.5 Quantitative risk analysis as presented in the Dutch "colored books" 4.6 Criticism of quantitative risk analysis 4.7 Risk perception 4.8 Risk-based approach in Dutch occupational safety 4.9 The acceptability of risks 5. The period after 1990: Risk becoming an accepted concept 5.1 Process Safety: quantitative risk analysis methodologies documented in textbook series 5.2 Exposure to: acceptable risk carcinogenic substances: basis for determining an acceptable risk level 5.3 Occupational safety: introduction of the concept of risk inventory and evaluation (RI&E) 6. Discussion and conclusions 6.1 Developments decisive for introducing the concept of risk in safety science in The Netherlands 6.2 Theories, models, and metaphors developed in the considered period (1970-1990) 6.3 Development of quantitative models 6.4 Risk as a new model 6.5 Differences between the introduction of the concept of risk into occupational safety and into process safety 7. Literature
This paper reviews a selection of target levels for safety and security in order to identify their common properties. It is accompanied by a brief investigation of several key terms used in risk management. Risk management is used as an umbrella term for the various research areas dealing with multiple hazards, impacts types and measures for dealing with them. The paper draws upon examples and experience from the wider field of disaster risk research and civil protection. A concept which identifies the common properties and content of risk management goals in general is then devised. Normative implications and challenges in applying risk management goals and the use of terminology are discussed. Finally, two main future research areas are briefly outlined: the role and responsibility of the researcher or observer; and the ways of making use of risk management goals in risk communication. This paper provides fundamental information on examples of risk management goals, common properties and risk communication as compiled for and used by certain national authorities in civil protection in Germany. However, its findings may also be useful for fellow researchers within the disaster risk, climate change, vulnerability and resilience community, and for practitioners in the field of risk, and crisis or emergency management. The future applications of these findings will be useful, especially when developing risk management goals for specific user groups and different levels of analysis.
New risk assessment tools in The Netherlands
Work (Reading, Mass.), 2012
In this paper an introduction to and description of the risk assessment tools that are freely available for companies in The Netherlands is given. It is explained in what way the tools can and should be used and how the level I checklist for physical load and the level II instruments are related. The two instruments that -in 2011- made this 'Dutch toolbox' complete, are the checklist physical load and the Working Posture Risk Assessment Tool (WRAP 1.0). The content, the development process and some examples of these tools are explained. The toolbox is complete but does need additional evaluation to improve the quality of the assessments and the usability in practice.
Enhancing Safety: the Challenge of Foresight - ESReDA Project Group Foresight in Safety
2020
This publication is final Technical report from ESReDA Project Group "Foresight in Safety" published by the Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European Commission's science and knowledge service. It aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policymaking process. The scientific output expressed does not imply a policy position of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use that might be made of this publication.
Risk and emergency preparedness assessment
This NORSOK standard is developed with broad petroleum industry participation by interested parties in the Norwegian petroleum industry and is owned by the Norwegian petroleum industry represented by The Norwegian Oil Industry Association (OLF) and The Federation of Norwegian Industry. Please note that whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this NORSOK standard, neither OLF nor The Federation of Norwegian Industry or any of their members will assume liability for any use thereof. Standards Norway is responsible for the administration and publication of this NORSOK standard. Standards Norway Telephone: + 47 67 83 86 00