How the Pentathlon Was Won: Two Pragmatic Models and the Evidence of Philostratus (original) (raw)

Abstract

F-A THOUS.HO ? ? MO?,, a? d.?F?-helW teM. ,nd ? numerous lesser games, the ancient Greeks held competitions in the pentathlon. There is nowhere even a hint of a suggestion that they had any difficulty determining winners in the event. By contrast, many modern scholars have demonstrated, or confessed to, bewilderment on that point as new theories or mutations on theories have proliferated over the past several generations without leading to any definitive answer.1 At the present time continuing attempts at solution seem to vie with an attitude of resigned agnosticism over this "perennial puzzle of Greek sport history," as Mark Golden has recently called it.2 Stephen Miller echoes with the concession that "We shall probably never know how the pentathlon victor was determined."3 Ancient informants, to be sure, are not very helpful, having left only a scattering of vague data which, if not inherently inconsistent, has been inconsistently interpreted, as the accumulating recent bibliography on the subject shows.4 Much of the theorizing to date supplements the sparse ancient testimony with speculation based on modern contests such as the decathlon, but unknown and hardly plausible in an ancient context. There is, for instance, no ancient evidence to suggest that the Greeks ever employed a point system such as some scholars attribute to them, nor is there any ancient basis for the hypothesis that they had something like the modern rep?chage, a procedure whereby non-winners in a first attempt are allowed a second attempt in order to qualify for victory. From everything we know, second-place finishers in Greek athletic contests usually got nothing better than dishonorable mention.5 In general, moreover, some of the currently competing theories involve procedures that seem intrinsically improbable in their complexity. Theories based on such "accounting operations" were already rife eighty years ago when E. Pavlinis inveighed against them, unsuccessfully.6 A full review of such theories will not be undertaken now, but a couple of relatively 1In Kyle's (1990: 291) gruesome metaphor, "extensive bibliography has been feeding off itself." 2 Golden 2004:130.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (23)

  1. Department of Classics University of Manitoba 220 Dysart Road Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2M8 regan@ms.umanitoba.ca BIBLIOGRAPHY Berketis, A. 1950. To n?vxa9A,ov. Athens. (Non vidi.)
  2. Garetta, A. tr. 1995. Filostrato di Lemno. II Manuale de??alienatore. Novara.
  3. Crowther, N. B. 1992. "Second-Place Finishes and Lower in Greek Athletics (Including the Pentathlon)," ZPE 90: 97-102.
  4. Decker, W. 2000. "Pentathlon," NP 9: 524-525.
  5. Ebert, J. 1963. Zum Pentathlon der Antike. Untersuchungen ?ber das System der Siegermittlung und die Ausfuhrung des Halterensprunges. Berlin.
  6. -1974. "Noch einmal zum Sieg im Pentathlon," ZPE 13: 257-262.
  7. Golden, M. 1998. Sport and Society in Ancient Greece. Cambridge.
  8. -2004. Sport in the Ancient World from A to Z. New York. Harris, H. A. 1972a. Sport in Greece and Rome. Ithaca.
  9. -1972b. "The Method of Deciding Victory in the Pentathlon," G&R 19: 60-64.
  10. Jackson, D. F. 1991. "Philostratus and the Pentathlon,"///? 111: 178-181.
  11. J?thner, J. ed. 1909. Philostratus ?ber Gymnastik. Leipzig and Berlin.
  12. Kayser, C. L. ed. 1870-71. Flavii Philostrati opera auctiora. 2 vols. Leipzig. Kitriniaris, K. S. ed. 1961. OtXoaxp?xoo ruuvaaxncoc. Athens.
  13. K?hner, R. 1904. Ausf?hrliche Grammatik der griechischen Sprache. Ed. B. Gerth. Hanover and Leipzig.
  14. Kyle, D. G. 1990. "Winning and Watching the Greek Pentathlon," Journal of Sport History 17:291-305.
  15. -1995. "Philostratus, 'Rep?chage,' Running and Wrestling: the Greek Pentathlon Again," Journal of Sport History 22: 60-65.
  16. Lee, H. M. 1995. "Yet Another Scoring System for the Ancient Pentathlon," Nikephoros 8:41-55.
  17. Mar?ti, E. 1994. "Zur Problematik des Wettlaufes und der Reihenfolge der einzelnen Disziplinen beim altgriechischen Pentathlon," AAntHung 35:1-24.
  18. Miller, S. G. 2004. Ancient Greek Athletics. New Haven and London.
  19. Pavlinis, E. 1927 [repr. 1953]. 'Iaxopia xrj? ruuvaaxiK-qc. Athens. This content downloaded from 132.174.250.38 on Tue, 30 Jan 2024 19:39:05 +00:00 All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
  20. Robinson, R. S. 1981. Sources for the History of Greek Athletics. Chicago.
  21. Schwyzer, E. 1939. Griechische Grammatik 1. Munich.
  22. Sweet, W. E. 1983. "A New Proposal for the Scoring of the Greek Pentathlon," ZPE 50: 287-290.
  23. -1987. Sport and Recreation in Ancient Greece: A Sourcebook with Translations. New York and Oxford.