Grice’s Conversational Cooperative Principles in Competitive Debates (original) (raw)
Related papers
Cooperative Principles in the 2019 Indonesian Presidential Debate: Grice's Maxim Analysis
Applied Linguistics Research Journal, 2019
This research aimed to analyze the types of maxims of the cooperative principle that were used and also violated in the 2019 Indonesian presidential debate. A descriptive method was applied to examine the research questions. The data of this study were the conversations that fulfilled and violated the cooperative principle based on four maxims of cooperative principles: Maxim of quantity, maxim of relation, maxim of manner, and maxim of quality. The results of this qualitative study revealed that the two maxims violated by the candidates in the 2019 Indonesian presidential debates were the maxim of relevance and maxim of manner. The maxim of manner was the mostly violated maxim by the candidates. The candidates not only violated but also fulfilled the maxims of the cooperative principle. They fulfilled the maxim of relevance, maxim of manner, and maxim of quality. Furthermore, the maxim of quality was the maxim that was mostly fulfilled by the candidates in the 2019 Indonesian Presidential Debates.
English Education Journal, 2018
___________________________________________________________________ This study aimed to explain the appropriateness of using gambits in students" debate competition, the debate structure realized in the students" debate competition, the contribution of gambits to the students" debate structure, and the ways the students overcome the difficulties of using gambits in the debate competition. To achieve the aims, this study used discourse analysis as the research design. To collect the data, this study used video recorder in observation and interview as the instrument. This study applied Keller and Warner (1988)"s theory about conversation gambits and Harvey-Smith (2011)"s theory about debate structure to analyze the data. The subjects in this study were 40 undergraduate students (20 teams) from different universities participating in National University Debating Championship (NUDC) 2018 of West Java. Their debate competition (five exhibitions) were observed, transcribed and analyzed. The objects of the study were the students" gambits and debate structure. The findings from observation showed that most of debaters used variety of gambits from opening, linking and responding gambits to deliver their speech appropriately. Most of debaters applied the debate structure in the debate competition. Only one or two debater/s did not apply some parts of the debate structure. The use of gambits gave high contribution to the students" debate structure to support them in making introduction, rebuttals, arguments, and conclusion in their debate speech. The results of interview showed that most of students learned gambits naturally and to overcome the difficulties of using gambits in any situation was by learning and practicing hard to make the speech perfect.
English Education Journal, 2020
_______________________________________________________________ ____ The aims of this study were to analyze the types of politeness strategies realized by student debaters and how the Indonesian Vs Malaysian student debaters used politeness strategies in the debate competition. The data of this research were taken from youTube of debate competition video series namely-WSDC 2018 R2: Indonesia VS Malaysia.‖ The study used a descriptive qualitative method which was analyzed using the politeness strategies propossed by (Brown and Levinson, 1987). The subjects in this study were 6 student debaters (2 teams) from Malaysia and Indonesia who participated in the 2018 World Schools Debating Championship (WSDC). This study found that most of the student debaters used positive politeness strategies to deliver their arguments appropriately. There were four types of politeness strategies realized by the debaters. Sub-strategies of positive politeness were mostly used by Indonesian debaters. They used sub-strategies of positive politeness to keep the hearer's positive face, to safe opinions when delivering arguments clearly as the opposition team and make the preposition team agreed with their insight. Malaysians used off-record strategy dominantly. They used inviting implicatures to imply meanings.
A STUDY OF ARGUMENTS IN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL DEBATE
This paper attempts to identify the representation of arguments in a private senior high school debate's club in Bandung. This study used a case study method, particularly text analysis and involved a debate activity of senior high school students that was purposively chosen. Halliday and Matthiessen' theory of mood and modality (2004) and Eggins and Slade' analytical strategies (1997) the paper will then delineate the results, showing that the arguments in the debate are represented through the extensive use of the declarative mood, median probability, extension conjunction, questions, and commands in declarative, explicitly subjective modality, and realization of metaphorical explicit subjective modality. Moreover, mood and modality analysis is helpful to understand the interpersonal meaning of the debate from a new perspective, which elaborates the subtleties of language use in this kind of genre and helps us have a better understanding of it. Therefore, such a study suggests that similar analysis could also benefit English learners in their improvement of English proficiency so that they can develop their communicative competence more effectively.
Students’ Discourse Strategies in a Classroom Debate Performance
KnE Social Sciences, 2019
Conducting a debate as one activity in a speaking class might provide opportunities for students to practice their exploratory talk as the benefits of performing this activity include developing an objectivity toward controversial questions and the ability to reason logically. In order to achieve its goals, students need to own communicative competences, which are categorized into grammatical competence, discourse competence, sociolinguistic competence and strategic competence. This study concerns with the students' use of discourse strategies as this shows their ability in connecting sentences or utterances to produce meaningful units of utterances. In addition, this strategy is required to deliver thought and comprehend ideas as it would require complete thought happening before and after the utterances to gain meaningful representation of the message. Therefore, the focus of this study is to find out types of discourse strategies the students employ during their debate performance in Speaking for Academic Purposes subject offered at the Department of English in a state university at East Java.
An Analysis of Debate Content Delivered by Speaking for Debate Students
RETAIN, 2019
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis konten debat yang disampaikan oleh mahasiswa kelas "Speaking for Debate" dengan menggunakan analisis struktur dasar argumen (Label, Explanation, Example, and Tie-back). Dalam menyusun sebuah argumen yang baik dan menyakinkan, mahasiswa harus mampu memenuhi semua struktur dasar argumen. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengembangan argument mahasiswa berdasarkan peran pembicara dalam sistem "British Parliamentary Debate". Penelitian kualitatif konten analisis digunakan untuk menjawab rumusanrumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini. Berdasarkan hasil analisis transkrip pidato mahasiswa kelas "Speaking for Debate" menunjukkan bahwa tidak semua siswa telah memenuhi struktur dasar dalam argumen dengan baik. Mereka kurang dalam contoh dan simpulan. Beberapa masalah juga ditemukan dalam penjelasan argumen yang disampaikan oleh mahasiswa. Permasalahan tersebut ialah alasan yang tidak relevan, argumen yang menimbulkan pertanyaan, dan kurangnya contoh atau bukti-bukti yang kuat untuk mendukung argumen mereka. Hal ini berpengaruh terhadap rendahnya kualitas argumen mereka dalam berdebat. Dalam mengembangkan argumen, hampir semua mahasiswa kelas "Speaking for Debate" memulai dari menyampaikan respon "rebuttal" dan memberikan argumen tim mereka. Tidak semua mahasiswa memenuhi peran pembicara dalam tim. Mereka tidak menyampaikan pidato pembuka yang mendukung argumen tim mereka.
The Effect of Debate Technique to Students’ Speaking Ability
2019
This research was conducted to study the effect of debate technique used in the speaking classroom. By so doing, this researcher expected that this research provided more information about the availability of using this technique to teach speaking, especially English speaking. This research involved 30 students at English Education Program in STKIP Kie Raha of Ternate. Tests (pre and posttest) were administered and also interview. Based on the data, it is found that there is significant difference between before and after the treatment. Although it is noted that most students still had less vocabulary and less self-confidence to talkative in the debate, the test scores showed that Debate Technique is available to be considered in teaching speaking.
Turn-Taking Analysis on Students’ Debate: Conversation Analysis
2023
In the conversation, normally the participants do not pay attention or are aware of the turn-taking that each one should consider. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate turn-taking patterns which are IRF (Initiation-Response-Feedback) in students' NUDC. The participants of this study were the NUDC teams from classes 2020A and 2021C of the English Study Program of UNIKA St. Paulus, Ruteng. The data were collected using the qualitative method to describe the IRF pattern in students' debates. The procedure for collecting the data was recording the debate, transcribing the spoken text, and analyzing and identifying the IRF pattern used by each debater. The result of the study was the dominant pattern used is IRF with 12 times (44.4%), the second is I with 8 times (29.6%, the third is RF with 6 times (22.2%), while the lowest is IR with only used one time (3.7%). The recommendation for the next researchers is to study the correlation between understanding the debate motion and turn-taking in debate.
Leaning and Teaching of Speaking through English Debate Club
2020
This research was meant to observe the process of teaching speaking using small-group discussion methods to the students in the English Debating Club at SMA Negeri 7 Banjarmasin. This research applied qualitative research method due to the source of the data collected, that is observation. The researcher concludes that the goals of small group discussions can be accomplished when both teacher and students are active in the activity since in the discussion technique, without communication, group members could not achieve their goals. Discussion is an incredibly valuable tool in small group teaching techniques to address the issues, such as performance, authenticity, etc., in a balanced and collaborative way while engaging with a particular topic. The power of the teacher to maintaining the classroom interaction while the small group discussion activity is going on is essential. The teacher talk such as deals with feelings, praises or encourages, uses ideas of students, asks question,...