Morini and Afghanistan Reconsidered: A Case for Strategic Design (original) (raw)
Related papers
What is Strategic Design? Cultivating Cognitive Agility for the Craft of Generalship
SheJi, 2022
This article presents the philosophy of strategic design as a reflexive practice for generalship in defense and security organizations. We present strategic design as a distinctive aspect of generalship which enables defense practi- tioners working at the strategic level to address the kind of complex security challenges facing military leaders and decision makers in the 21st century. Our approach in this article combines unique first-hand insights from the co-instructor of the Israeli Defense Forces Generals’ Course, cross-cultural expertise on socialization of knowledge in defense and security settings, and elements of narrative and critical theory relevant to military design practice. We advocate cognitive agility as a critical mindset for defense leaders who need to generate transformative potential in an era of wars with no end. To illustrate a model of cognitive agility for generalship, we unpack some of the more esoteric aspects of the “Z model” of strategic design inquiries. The key to the Z model are the concepts of self-disruption, the strategic effective- ness of storytelling, and the principle of leveraging real-world operations as the expression of epistemology in a
A Tale of Four Strategies: The War in Afghanistan
Military Technology, 2010
War is usually a complex, multi-sided contest and it is an even more extraordinarily complex to wage successful warfare in Afghanistan. With a resurgent Taliban taking over large areas of Afghanistan in 2007 to 2009, U.S., NATO and Afghan National Army forces have swung into action and are conducting operations in Helmand Province and other areas to deny the area to the Taliban and Al Qaeda and win public support. The area around Kandahar is next and Kandahar 1 is Afghanistan’s second largest city and the spiritual birthplace of the Taliban. The war, now in it’s 9th year, is nowhere near culmination. Most ‘experts” expect decades of fighting yet to come to the war-weary Afghans. The question that is asked by anyone seriously interested in military affairs is how will the war play out in the months and years to come?
Review of the Strategic Framework for Afghanistan
Review of the Strategic Framework for Afghanistan, 2001
The UN's Strategic Framework was set up in Afghanistan in the late 1990s under the first Taliban government. The Strategic Framework a major innovation Intended to enable 'aid' and 'politics' to work together in a complex emergency. By the time of the review in 2001 (shortly before the ill-fated western invasion), as detailed in the Review, the Framework was already in a state of crisis.
Terrorism and Insurgency in Asia: A contemporary examination of terrorist and separatist movements, 2019
This chapter analyses recent efforts by Western states to address the threat from terrorism and insurgency in Afghanistan since the end of the long-running International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) and commencement of the new Resolute Support Mission (RSM) in 2015. Although the RSM era has seen responsibility for security increasingly transferred to the Afghan government, Western states remain heavily engaged in the country. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and partner countries have deployed some 14,000 troops in support of the RSM ‘train, advise and assist’ (TAA) mission (SIGAR 2018). For the United States, Afghanistan remains its largest overseas military operation involving the deployment of thousands of civilian and military advisors as well as special operations forces as part of a separate counter-terror mission: Operation Freedom’s Sentinel. Indeed, America continues to dominate the Western coalition’s Afghanistan strategy, with European partners generally following its lead.
Ends + Ways + Means = (Bad) Strategy
Within the US defense community, strategy making has become a narrow-minded exercise rooted in the concepts of ends, ways, and means and the whole-of-government approach. Strategic thinking can be improved by defining strategy as a theory of success and understanding that the purpose of strategy is to create advantage, generate new sources of power, and exploit weaknesses in the opponent. This analysis of the 2009 Afghanistan policy review and strategy-making process illustrates an approach to overcoming dysfunctional strategic practices.
2019
This work addresses a void in the literature discussing the use of Design Methodology to understand contemporary conflict that often manifests as small wars. Much of the existing work on the topic focuses on various ways to employ the methodology and rarely present examples of successful use. Many descriptions also seek to convert the methodology into a linear progression, much like traditional military planning processes. Additionally, U. S. Joint Doctrine conflates Design Methodology with the traditional operational art concept of Operational Design which hurts the ability to fully understand both important concepts. This article uses interviews with a senior U. S. Marine planner present on the ground to describe the first successful use of Design Methodology in the Battles of Fallujah, Iraq in 2004. It stresses the need to employ the methodology as its originators intended; as conceptual planning meant to be an open, flowing group discussion of what is learned about the complex problem at hand. Proper use of Design Methodology will aid decision makers, in understanding current and future small wars as complex problems, enabling them to better decide whether to act or not, and if action is desired to develop ways to move the existing problem to a desired different state.