Research Ethics Committees In Africa: Authors' Reply (original) (raw)
Related papers
Research Ethics
The research ethics committee (REC) is a key element of university administration and has gained increasing importance as a review mechanism for those institutions that wish to conduct responsible research, along with safeguarding research ethics standards, scientific merit and human rights of participants. Given the critical role of the university REC, it is argued that there is a need to assesses and understand the work of RECs to identify areas for improvement and thus focus on capacity building to respond to the escalating volume, type and complexity of research. This paper reports on the research ethics outcomes of a social science REC in a Business Faculty at a South African university during its seminal period of operation (2010–2015). Content methodology and a standardised questionnaire were used to assess the REC. The results show the increasing workload of the REC with favourable scores for submission/review processes and minute-taking. However, lower scores were seen for ...
Developing World Bioethics
Health research initiatives worldwide are growing in scope and complexity, particularly as they move into the developing world. Expanding health research activity in low-and middle-income countries has resulted in a commensurate rise in the need for sound ethical review structures and functions in the form of Research Ethics Committees (RECs). The urgent need for continued capacity development in Africa has necessitated research initiatives to identify existing capacity. This discussion paper describes the mapping of RECs in Africa through MARC (Mapping African Research Ethics Capacity) project, second phase (2012 to date) and discusses the findings. MARC provides a platform and tool on COHRED's Health Research HRWeb, which can be used by RECs and key stakeholders in health research in Africa to identify capacity, constraints and development needs.
Research Ethics Capacity Building in Sub-Saharan Africa
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: An International Journal, 2014
The last fifteen years have witnessed a significant increase in investment in research ethics capacity development throughout the world. We examine nine research ethics training programs that are focused on Sub-Saharan Africa and supported by the US National Institutes of Health. We collected data from grants awards' documents and annual reports supplemented by questionnaires completed by the training program directors. Together, these programs provided long-term training in research ethics to 275 African professionals, strengthened research ethics committees in 19 countries in Sub-Saharan Africa, and created research ethics curricula at many institutions and bioethics centers within Africa. Trainees' leadership resulted in new national systems and policies on research ethics, human tissue storage and export, and methods of monitoring compliance with research ethics guidelines. Training programs adapted to challenges that arose due to varied trainees' background knowledg...
Research Ethics and Ethical Dilemmas in the South African Context
Postgraduate Study in South Africa- Surviving and Succeeding, 2016
The universal values of respect and care for fellow human beings lie central to research ethics. Due to the fallible nature of mankind, these values need to be pronounced and even inscribed, and hence, as researchers, we need to have ethical
Evaluating institutional capacity for research ethics in Africa: a case study from Botswana
BMC Medical Ethics, 2013
Background: The increase in the volume of research conducted in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMIC), has brought a renewed international focus on processes for ethical conduct of research. Several programs have been initiated to strengthen the capacity for research ethics in LMIC. However, most such programs focus on individual training or development of ethics review committees. The objective of this paper is to present an approach to institutional capacity assessment in research ethics and application of this approach in the form of a case study from an institution in Africa.
Applying Research Ethics Guidelines: The View from a Sub-Saharan Research Ethics Committee
Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: An International Journal, 2007
Considerable variation has been demonstrated in applying regulations across research ethics committees (RECs) in the U.S., U.K., and European nations. With the rise of international research collaborations, RECs in developing countries apply a variety of international regulations. We conducted a qualitative descriptive pilot study with members of the national REC in Malawi to determine criteria they use to review research, and their views on international collaborations. Qualitative content analysis demonstrated that international guidelines are interpreted in light of local African conditions such that emphasis is placed on examining benefit to the community and ensuring the informed consent process translates concepts in locally-meaningful ways. Members suggest that RECs often must comply with regulations that do not fit local conditions. Recommendations are provided for improving such international collaborations.
2018
The nature of concerns and issues raised by research ethics committees (RECs) during protocol review meetings can be informative about the principles which they apply in protocol review, yet little is known about the actual concerns they raise. This study sought to examine these local concerns in light of the internationally acclaimed Emanuel et al. (2004) framework and also describe the pattern of the ethical issues raised. Protocol review meetings' minutes can provide a rich source of information and insight into the concerns that RECs raise during protocol review meetings. These concerns are central to the practice of research ethics: they shape the nature of research and sometimes even alter the knowledge it produces, and by doing so, contour what comprises ethical research and how this can be pursued. Nevertheless, these concerns have seldom been subject to scrutiny. Accordingly, this study carried out a qualitative analysis of minutes written during the review of protocols by a Zimbabwean REC overseeing biomedical, health and behavioural research. It sought to offer a description and analysis of the REC's concerns, using the Emanuel et al. framework. It is hoped that this study will provide a useful window into the REC's concerns. Key findings were that 65% of concerns raised during REC review fitted into the Emanuel et al. (2004) framework. Of these, the most frequently raised concerns revolved around the principle of informed consent. The principle with the least number of concerns was social value. The study also noted a significant number of concerns which did not necessarily fit into the Emanuel et al. (2004) framework which seems to suggest the REC's preoccupation with routine, procedural concerns.
Developing World Bioethics, 2009
Background: As actors with the key responsibility for the protection of human research participants, Research Ethics Committees (RECs) need to be competent and well-resourced in order to fulfil their roles. Despite recent programs designed to strengthen RECs in Africa, much more needs to be accomplished before these committees can function optimally.Objective: To assess training needs for biomedical research ethics evaluation among targeted countries.Methods: Members of RECs operating in three targeted African countries were surveyed between August and November 2007. Before implementing the survey, ethical approvals were obtained from RECs in Switzerland, Cameroon, Mali and Tanzania. Data were collected using a semi-structured questionnaire in English and in French.Results: A total of 74 respondents participated in the study. The participation rate was 68%. Seventy one percent of respondents reported having received some training in research ethics evaluation. This training was given by national institutions (31%) and international institutions (69%). Researchers and REC members were ranked as the top target audiences to be trained. Of 32 topics, the top five training priorities were: basic ethical principles, coverage of applicable laws and regulations, how to conduct ethics review, evaluating informed consent processes and the role of the REC.Conclusion: Although the majority of REC members in the targeted African countries had received training in ethics, they expressed a need for additional training. The results of this survey have been used to design a training program in research ethics evaluation that meets this need.