Social Responsibility in Higher Education Institutions: Application Case from the Middle East (original) (raw)
Related papers
Developing university social responsibility: A model for the challenges of the new civil society
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2010
The World Declaration on Higher Education in the Twenty-First Century drawn up at the World Conference of Higher Education organized by UNESCO in Paris in 1998, the Communication of the 2009 UNESCO World Conference on Higher Education, Paris, 2009 held in compliance with the guidelines of the 1998 Declaration and the list of objectives of the Bologna Process highlight that social responsibility is increasingly considered an intrinsic aspect of the higher education system, particularly of the universities. This paper aims to explain the shifting from Corporate Social University to University Social Responsibility, by presenting the conceptual framework of Social Responsibility and the university as a special type of organization which needs to adopt a social responsibility strategy just like the other organizations, in order to meet the expectations of the stakeholders (present students, future students, supporters etc). The paper presents, on the other hand, a general University Social Responsibility model in the context of globalization and develops a University Social Responsibility model considering the realities and challenges of the Romanian higher education system.
University as State Agent or Social Actor: Al Akhawayn University and Social Responsibility
Knowledge Studies in Higher Education, 2021
University Social Responsibility (USR) has been addressed in the academic literature and in professional educational meetings only in the last 10–15 years, but it is far from being unanimously accepted as part of a university’s mission. A university is all about serving society anyway; its mission has always been to educate people, to train professionals, and to prepare young men and women for their roles as good citizens of their countries and of the world. So, what other social role is a university to serve that it does not? This issue becomes more acute and compelling when society’s expectations of service from higher education institutions has to do with K-12 school education, as is the situation for the Covid-19 pandemic. The chapter considers the case of Al Akhawayn University (AUI) in Ifrane, Morocco (AUI), a university that has been established by the State as the first public, autonomous, non-governmental institution of higher education in the country. We describe several s...
Objective-Are stakeholders within the institution as actors, or are they also the goals of the institution's social responsibility? This study aims to provide new insight into the role of stakeholders in the implementation of social responsibility in Higher Education Institutions (HEI). Institutions have a certain level of social responsibility, which is inherent to its existence. To exist, an institution relies on the presence of stakeholders. Stakeholders are considered as the key to an institution's legitimacy. The relationship between an institution and its stakeholders can be described as a social contract. Methodology/Technique-Using a qualitative approach, this study identifies the relevant stakeholders in HEI's and categorizes their roles and interests. The concept of HEI social dimension is used to analyze and interpret the data. The results indicate that HEI stakeholders consist of three levels, namely: primary (including management, lecturers, students, administrative staff, security officers, technicians, cleaning services, and the natural environment of the institution), secondary (including the local community, industries, alumni organizations, the government, accreditation agency, and the natural environment around the institution), and tertiary level (including society in general and nature). Finding & Novelty-The results suggest that the primary stakeholders become moral actors who carry out the institution's commitment to implement social responsibility. This finding implies that primary stakeholders become the executor and the goal of HEI social responsibility. Therefore, the institution's social responsibilities activities are aimed at the life and development of the institution itself. Social responsibility is carried out from the inside to the outside in a circular and continuous manner.
Social Responsibility At The Academic Level. Study Case: The University Of Bucharest
STUDIES AND SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHES. ECONOMICS EDITION
In the last decades the corporate social responsibility (CSR) has been a major subject both for universities, civil society and businesses. Although the CSR concept is especially promoted by large multinational and transnational corporations, it has become also a prominent issue for universities. Social responsibility represents more than a challenge for universities. It has to be a purpose of the universities, taking into account that young people formation also means creating a high level of awareness about the need to involve members of society in solving social problems. Our paper contributes for better clarifying the CSR concept and presents as a study case some of initiatives of the University of Bucharest related to the social responsibility.
Social Responsibility of Higher Education Institutions: A New Insight into Stakeholders
GATR Global Journal of Business Social Sciences Review, 2019
Objective-Are stakeholders within the institution as actors, or are they also the goals of the institution's social responsibility? This study aims to provide new insight into the role of stakeholders in the implementation of social responsibility in Higher Education Institutions (HEI). Institutions have a certain level of social responsibility, which is inherent to its existence. To exist, an institution relies on the presence of stakeholders. Stakeholders are considered as the key to an institution's legitimacy. The relationship between an institution and its stakeholders can be described as a social contract. Methodology/Technique-Using a qualitative approach, this study identifies the relevant stakeholders in HEI's and categorizes their roles and interests. The concept of HEI social dimension is used to analyze and interpret the data. The results indicate that HEI stakeholders consist of three levels, namely: primary (including management, lecturers, students, administrative staff, security officers, technicians, cleaning services, and the natural environment of the institution), secondary (including the local community, industries, alumni organizations, the government, accreditation agency, and the natural environment around the institution), and tertiary level (including society in general and nature). Finding & Novelty-The results suggest that the primary stakeholders become moral actors who carry out the institution's commitment to implement social responsibility. This finding implies that primary stakeholders become the executor and the goal of HEI social responsibility. Therefore, the institution's social responsibilities activities are aimed at the life and development of the institution itself. Social responsibility is carried out from the inside to the outside in a circular and continuous manner. Type of Paper: Empirical.
Revisiting University Social Responsibility
2021
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) as an organisation's collective responsibility for its impact on society has become an established concept in management scholarship since the 1990s. De Bakker, Groenewegen, and den Hond (2005) showcase the variety of institutional responsibilityrelated concepts since 1950, ranging from 1950 to 2002 until they were merged into CSR by Archie Carroll (1991). Since the beginning of the 1990s, CSR has received immense attention from academia, evidenced by a rise in the number of publications in the leading management journals (De Bakker et al., 2005). Nowadays, the concept has departed from an initial definition of an organisation's economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic responsibilities as proposed by Carroll. Moreover, it is no longer considered a voluntary activity, which was a prevalent characteristic in the first decade of the 2000s (Crane, Matten, & Spence, 2008). Rather, the conceptual dimensions of economic, environmental,
Library Progress International, 2024
Universities worldwide have begun to acknowledge the significance of civic engagement and incorporate their campuses and communities into these programs. Consequently, social responsibility is increasingly acknowledged as a fundamental element of the higher education system, particularly inside institutions. The World Conference on Higher Education in the Twenty-First Century, formulated at the 1998 UNESCO World Conference on Higher Education in Paris, along with the Communication from the 2009 UNESCO World Conference on Higher Education, adheres to the principles of the 1998 Declaration and the objectives outlined in the Bologna Process, all underscore the increasing acknowledgment of social responsibility as a fundamental aspect of universities. This study will first present the conceptual framework of social responsibility to elucidate the transition from corporate social responsibility to university social responsibility. It will also examine colleges as a unique entity that requires the adoption of a social responsibility plan. This will be accomplished by examining the literature on the notion of University Social Responsibility (USR). The study subsequently examines the official websites of 21 state and private universities in the capital city of Turkey, to assess the prominence of social responsibility programs. Consequently, a few universities exhibit their social responsibility practices on their websites.
2019
This article discusses about social responsibility from the point of view of higher education. The university in general is an institution with the highest honor in the academic environment. Then the university becomes the instrument of social climbing for most people in the society of developing countries. University social responsibility (USR) is a principle for social movements, which uses an ethical approach to develop and engage with local and global communities to maintain ecological, environmental, technical, social, and economic development. USR acts is a crucial player for social change because USR implies having an ethical quality policy, which regulates the performance of the university community. USR has an impact not only on universities but also on the global community and society. Keywords: University, Social Responsibility, Community Development
A Review Literature on University Social Responsibility Initiatives in the Global Context
Journal of emerging technologies and innovative research, 2019
Social responsibility is gradually considered as an essential aspect of the higher education system, mainly for the universities. Some Universities are addressing important practical issues of the economy towards enhancing skills of young minds, giving them practical orientation, making them conscious of their responsibility towards society and finally leading to community empowerment. The experts from Europe, Africa, North America, Latin America and Asia concluded that the social responsibility of specific universities should be fostered promoting the preparation of specific Social Responsibility programmes at institutional level, including three main dimensions: social, economic and environmental. University Social Responsibility (USR) plays a roadmap which gives a vision to universities for developing solutions of economic, social, and environmental problems in society. The purpose of this paper is to review the literature on University Social Responsibility Initiatives in the gl...
Managing Social Responsibility in Universities
Springer eBooks, 2021
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.