The Supreme Court and the attitudinal model revisited (original) (raw)
How the Dissent Becomes the Majority: Using Federalism to Transform Coalitions in the U.S. Supreme Court
Vanessa Baird
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2005
View PDFchevron_right
doi:10.1017/S0003055408080283 Does Legal Doctrine Matter? Unpacking Law and Policy Preferences on the U.S. Supreme Court
Michael Bailey
2015
View PDFchevron_right
Federalism' s Old Deal: What' s Right and Wrong with Conservative Judicial Activism
Peter M Shane
View PDFchevron_right
Activism, Ideology, and Federalism: Judicial Behavior In Constitutional Challenges Before the Rehnquist Court, 1986-2000
Rorie Solberg
Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2006
View PDFchevron_right
Federalism's 'Old Deal': What is Right and Wrong With Conservative Judicial Activism
Peter M Shane
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2000
View PDFchevron_right
From Bakke to Grutter and Gratz : The Supreme Court as a Policymaking Institution
KATHERINE NAFF
Review of Policy Research, 2004
View PDFchevron_right
Judicious invention: flexible application of judicial doctrine in the Roberts Court's voting rights jurisprudence
John Banister
Communication Quarterly, 2022
View PDFchevron_right
The Will of the Minority: The Rule of Four on the United States Supreme Court 1
Songying Fang
Social Science Research Network, 2008
View PDFchevron_right
Will of the Minority: Rule of Four on the United States Supreme Court
Timothy Johnson
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2007
View PDFchevron_right
Judicial Review by the Burger and Rehnquist Courts
rorie solberg
Political Research Quarterly, 2007
View PDFchevron_right
Statutory Interpretation, Constitutional Limits, and the Dangers of Collaboration: The Ironic Case of the Voting Rights Act
Luis Fuentes-Rohwer
Bepress Legal Series, 2006
View PDFchevron_right
Does Legal Doctrine Matter? Unpacking Law and Policy Preferences on the U.S. Supreme Court
Michael Bailey
American Political Science Review, 2008
View PDFchevron_right
How Conservative is the Rehnquist Court--Three Issues, One Answer
Staci Rosche
Fordham Law Review, 1997
View PDFchevron_right
The Federalism-Rights Nexus: Explaining Why Senate Democrats Tolerate Rehnquist Court Decision Making But Not the Rehnquist Court
Neal Devins
2002
View PDFchevron_right
Equality and Federalism in U.S.-American Civil Rights Law: A Review of Two Recent Supreme Court Cases on Same-sex Marriage and Voting Rights
Blake Emerson
View PDFchevron_right
\u3cem\u3eMedellin v. Texas\u3c/em\u3e: The Roberts Court and New Frontiers for Federalism
Shawn Hogue
2010
View PDFchevron_right
Judicial Activism and the Interpretation of the Voting Rights Act
Mohammad Ali
Cardozo Law Review, 2011
View PDFchevron_right
Stripping the Gears of National Government: Justice Stevens's Stand Against Judicial Subversion of Progressive Laws and Lawmaking
simon lazarus
Northwestern University Law Review, 2015
View PDFchevron_right
US Supreme Court Decisions: Judicial Philosophy, Precedent and Originalism
John McKeon Jr.
Constitutional Law Review Paper
View PDFchevron_right
Stripping the Gears of National Government: Justice Stevens' Stand Against Judicial Subversion of Progressive Laws and Lawmaking
simon lazarus
Social Science Research Network, 2011
View PDFchevron_right
The Future of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act in the Hands of a Conservative Court
Luis Fuentes-Rohwer
5 Duke Journal of Constitutional Law Public Policy 125, 2010
View PDFchevron_right
Can the Supreme Court Constitutionally Uphold the Hopwood Opinion? Race, Color-blindness and Public Opinion before Bakke
Marco Portales
Callaloo, 2003
View PDFchevron_right
The Federal Courts in the Political Order: Judicial Jurisdiction and American Political Theory
James Hopenfeld
Michigan Law Review, 1992
View PDFchevron_right
Crucial and Routine Decisions: A New Explanation of Why Ideology Affects US Supreme Court Decision Making the Way it Does
Tracy Lightcap
2010
View PDFchevron_right
Crucial and Routine Decisions: Why Ideology Affects Us Supreme Court Decision-Making the Way It Does
Tracy Lightcap
lagrange.edu
View PDFchevron_right
Rachael K. Hinkle, Academia.edu, "Legal Constraint in the US Courts of Appeals" (originally published The University of Chicago Press "the jouranl of politics," Volume 77, Number 3 July 2015)
Scott Stafne
View PDFchevron_right
Justice Sotomayor's Undemocratic Dissent in Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action
Adam Lamparello
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2000
View PDFchevron_right
Not "Wrongful" by Any Means: The Court's Decisions in the Redistricting Cases
Carol M. Swain
1997
View PDFchevron_right
Ideology and Judicial Deference in the D.C. Circuit
Christopher Banks
Southeastern Political Review
View PDFchevron_right
Politics and the Supreme Court: The Need for Ideological Balance
David Orentlicher
SSRN Electronic Journal
View PDFchevron_right
Towards an Integrated Model of the Supreme Court's Federalism Decision Making
Paul Collins
2006
View PDFchevron_right
The Supreme Court in American Politics
Isaac Unah
2009
View PDFchevron_right
Foreword: Elected Branch Influeces in Constitutional Decisionmaking
Neal Devins
1993
View PDFchevron_right
Issues and Outcomes in State Supreme Court Judicial Review Cases
Carol Traut
Southeastern Political Review, 2008
View PDFchevron_right
Party, Policy, or Duty: Why Does the Supreme Court Invalidate Federal Statutes?
Thomas Keck
View PDFchevron_right