Guidelines for a Polycentric Region to Reduce Vehicle Use and Increase Walking and Transit Use (original) (raw)

Abstract

Problem, research strategy, and findings: The monocentric development pattern in the Alonso-Mills-Muth model underpinned theoretical discussions of urban form in the 1960s and 1970s and truly dominated theory up to the point when Joel Garreau published Edge City: Life on the New Frontier in the early 1990s. Monocentric development patterns remain dominant to this day among smaller metropolitan areas in the United States. However, for larger metropolitan areas in the United States, regional transportation plans suggest a paradigm shift to a polycentric structure. We review 126 regional transportation plans in the United States and find that a hierarchy of centers connected by high-quality transit has become the dominant vision for most of them. The plan for Salt Lake City (UT), for example, strives for a multicentered region even though secondary centers are only beginning to emerge beyond a dominant downtown. Generally missing from regional transportation plans are quantitative criteria for designating and guiding centers: In no case are the quantitative criteria empirically based on proven transportation benefits. Here we investigate how the built environment characteristics of centers are associated with people's travel mode choices and vehicle use. We employ visual and exploratory approaches through a generalized additive model (GAM) to identify nonlinear relationships between travel outcomes and "D" variables (density, diversity, design, destination accessibility, and distance to transit) within centers. The model and plots help us recommend the built environment characteristics of centers. Takeaway for practice: The built environment thresholds and relevant tools provided here can enable planners to make informed decisions about future growth patterns, set realistic-yet visionary-goals, and improve the overall health of its residents and communities. We provide strategies and tools that planning agencies, such as metropolitan planning organizations, transit agencies, and municipalities, can adopt to channel developments into centers.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (71)

  1. Alonso, W. (1964). Location and land use: Toward a general theory of land rent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  2. Anas, A., Arnott, R., & Small, K. A. (1998). Urban spatial struc- ture. Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 1426-1464.
  3. Anderson, N.B., & Bogart, W.T. (2001). The structure of sprawl: Identifying and characterizing employment centers in polycen- tric metropolitan areas. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 60(1), 147-169. doi:10.1111/1536-7150.00058
  4. Brunsdon, C., Fotheringham, A. S., & Charlton, M. E. (2010). Geographically weighted regression. Geographical Analysis, 28(4), 281-298. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1996.tb00936.x Burger, M., de Goei, B., van der Laan, L., & Huisman, F. J. M. (2011). Heterogeneous development of metropolitan spatial structure: Evidence from commuting patterns in English and Welsh city-regions, 1981-2001. Cities, 28, 160-170. doi:10. 1016/j.cities.2010.11.006
  5. Burger, M. J., & Meijers, E. J. (2012). Form follows function? Linking morphological and functional polycentricity. Urban Studies, 49(5), 1127-1149. doi:10.1177/0042098011407095
  6. Cervero, R. (1989). America's suburban centers: The land use- transportation link. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.
  7. Davoudi, S. (2003). European briefing: Polycentricity in European spatial planning: From an analytical tool to a norma- tive agenda. European Planning Studies, 11(8), 979-999. doi: 10.1080/0965431032000146169
  8. Dieleman, F. M., & Faludi, A. (1998). Polynucleated metropol- itan regions in northwest Europe: Theme of the special issue. European Planning Studies, 6(4), 365-377. doi:10.1080/ 09654319808720468
  9. ESPON. (2005). 1.1.1. Potentials for polycentric development in Europe. Project report-revised version. Brussels, Belgium/ Stockholm, Sweden: ESPON & Nordregio. ESPON. (2007). 1.4.3. Study on urban functions. Brussels, Belgium: ESPON & IGEAT.
  10. Ewing, R. (1997). Is Los Angeles-style sprawl desirable? Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(1), 107-126. doi:10.1080/01944369708975728
  11. Ewing, R., & Bartholomew, K. (2018). Best practices in metro- politan transportation planning. London, UK: Routledge.
  12. Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2010). Travel and the built environ- ment: A meta-analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(3), 265-294. doi:10.1080/01944361003766766
  13. Ewing, R., & Hamidi, S. (2015). Compactness versus sprawl: A review of recent evidence from the United States. Journal of Planning Literature, 30(4), 413-432. doi:10.1177/ 0885412215595439
  14. Ewing, R., & Hamidi, S. (2017). Costs of sprawl. New York, NY: Routledge.
  15. Ewing, R., Tian, G., Goates, J. P., Zhang, M., Greenwald, M. J., Joyce, A., … Greene, W. (2015). Varying influences of the built environment on household travel in 15 diverse regions of the United States. Urban Studies, 52(13), 2330-2348. doi:10.1177/ 0042098014560991
  16. Ewing, R., Tian, G., Park, K., Sabouri, S., Stinger, P., & Proffitt, D. (2019). Comparative case studies: Trip and parking gener- ation at Orenco Station TOD, Portland Region and Station Park TAD, Salt Lake City Region. Cities, 87, 48-59. doi:10.1016/j.cit- ies.2018.12.020
  17. Fujita, M., & Ogawa, H. (1982). Multiple equilibria and struc- tural transition of non-monocentric urban configurations. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 12(2), 161-196. doi: 10.1016/0166-0462(82)90031-X Garcia-L opez, M. A., & Muñiz, I. (2010). Employment decentral- isation: Polycentricity or scatteration? The case of Barcelona. Urban Studies, (14)47, 3035-3056. doi:10.1177/ 0042098009360229
  18. Garreau, J. (1991). Edge city: Life on the new frontier. New York, NY: Anchor.
  19. Geppert, A. (2009). Polycentricity: Can we make it happen? From a concept to its implementation. Urban Research & Practice, 2(3), 251-268. doi:10.1080/17535060903319145
  20. Ghosh, D., & Vogt, A. (2012). Outliers: An evaluation of methodologies. In Joint statistical meetings (pp. 3455-3460).
  21. Giuliano, G., Agarwal, A., & Redfearn, C. (2008). Metropolitan spatial trends in employment and housing. Transportation Research Board, 29, 1-39. Retrieved from http://onlinepubs. trb.org/onlinepubs/sr/sr298giuliano.pdf.
  22. Giuliano, G., & Small, K.A. (1991). Subcenters in the Los Angeles region. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 21(2), 163-182. doi:10.1016/0166-0462(91)90032-I Goess, S., de Jong, M., & Meijers, E. (2016). City branding in polycentric urban regions: Identification, profiling and trans- formation in the Randstad and Rhine-Ruhr. European Planning Studies, 24(11), 2036-2056. doi:10.1080/09654313.2016. 1228832
  23. Gordon, P., & Richardson, H. W. (1997). Are compact cities a desirable planning goal? Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(1), 95-106. doi:10.1080/01944369708975727
  24. Gordon, P., Richardson, H. W., & Wong, H. (1986). The distri- bution of population and employment in a polycentric city: The case of Los Angeles. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 18(2), 161-173. doi:10.1068/a180161
  25. Green, N. (2007). Functional polycentricity: A formal definition in terms of social network analysis. Urban Studies, 44(11), 2077-2103. doi:10.1080/00420980701518941
  26. Hague, C., & Kirk, K. (2003). Polycentricity scoping study. Edinburgh, Scotland: School of the Built Environment, Heriot- Watt University. Retrieved from http://archive.northsearegion. eu/files/user/File/Events/Thematic%20Events/Polycentric% 20Seminar/ScopingPoly.pdf.
  27. Hall, S. P., & Pain, K. (2009). The polycentric metropolis: Learning from mega-city regions in Europe (1st ed.). London, UK; Sterling, VA: Routledge.
  28. Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (1990). Generalized additive models. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
  29. Hothorn, T., & Everitt, B. S. (2014). A handbook of statistical analysis using R. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
  30. Hu, L., Sun, T., & Wang, L. (2018). Evolving urban spatial struc- ture and commuting patterns: A case study of Beijing, China. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 59, 11-22. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2017.12.007
  31. Kloosterman, R. C., & Musterd, S. (2001). The polycentric urban region: Towards a research agenda. Urban Studies, 38(4), 623-633. doi:10.1080/00420980120035259
  32. Krugman, P. R. (1993). Geography and trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  33. Lang, R., & Knox, P. K. (2009). The new metropolis: Rethinking megalopolis. Regional Studies, 43(6), 789-802. doi:10.1080/ 00343400701654251
  34. Levine, J. (2006). Zoned out: Regulation, markets, and choices in transportation and metropolitan land use. Washington, DC: RFF Press.
  35. Li, Y., Xiong, W., & Wang, X. (2019). Does polycentric and com- pact development alleviate urban traffic congestion? A case study of 98 Chinese cities. Cities, 88, 100-111. doi:10.1016/j. cities.2019.01.017
  36. Limtanakool, N., Dijst, M., & Schwanen, T. (2007). A theoretical framework and methodology for characterizing national urban systems on the basis of flows of people: Empirical evidence for France and Germany. Urban Studies, 44(11), 2123-2145. doi:10.1080/00420980701518990
  37. Liu, X., Derudder, B., & Wang, M. (2018). Polycentric urban development in China: A multi-scale analysis. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 45(5), 953-972. doi:10.1177/2399808317690155
  38. Liu, X., & Wang, M. (2016). How polycentric is urban China and why? A case study of 318 cities. Landscape and Urban Planning, 151, 10-20. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.03.007
  39. Lyons, T., Baker, J., Ewing, R., Dillon, A., Sabouri, S., Kiani, F., … Spain, A. (2020). Growth management effectiveness: A lit- erature review. Paper presented at the TRB 99th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
  40. Masip-Tresserra, J. (2016). Polycentricity, performance and planning: Concepts, evidence and policy in Barcelona. Catalonia. Architecture and the Built Environment, 6(7), 1-348. doi:10.7480/abe.2016.6
  41. McDonald, J. F. (1987). The identification of urban employment subcenters. Journal of Urban Economics, 21(2), 242-258. doi:10.1016/0094-1190(87)90017-9
  42. McMillen, D. P., & Smith, S. C. (2003). The number of subcen- ters in large urban areas. Journal of Urban Economics, 53(3), 321-338. doi:10.1016/S0094-1190(03)00026-3
  43. Meeteren, M. V., Poorthuis, A., Derudder, B., & Witlox, F. (2016). Pacifying Babel's Tower: A scientometric analysis of pol- ycentricity in urban research. Urban Studies, 53(6), 1278-1298. doi:10.1177/0042098015573455
  44. Meijers, E., & Romein, A. (2002). Building regional policy net- works: A development strategy for polycentric urban regions. Paper presented at the EURA Conference on Urban and Spatial European Policies: Levels of Territorial Government, 18-20
  45. Meijers, E., & Sandberg, K. (2008). Reducing regional dispar- ities by means of polycentric development: Panacea or pla- cebo? Scienze Regionali -Italian Journal of Regional Science, 7(2), 71-96. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/pub- lication/241758007_Reducing_Regional_Disparities_by_Means_ of_Polycentric_Development_Panacea_or_Placebo.
  46. Mills, E. S. (1972). Studies in the structure of the urban econ- omy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. doi:10.1086/ahr/83.5.1353-a Modarres, A. (2011). Polycentricity, commuting pattern, urban form: The case of Southern California. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(6), 1193-1211. doi:10.1111/j. 1468-2427.2010.00994.x Mogridge, M. (1985). Transport, land use and energy inter- action. Urban Studies, 22(6), 481-492. doi:10.1080/ 00420988520080851
  47. Montgomery County. (2015). Montco 2040: A shared vision. Retrieved from https://www.montcopa.org/DocumentCenter/ View/7719/Adopted-Montco-2040-Shared-Vision_01_16_ 2015?bidId¼.
  48. Muth, R. F. (1969). Cities and housing: The spatial pattern of urban residential land use. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  49. Naess, P. (2006). Urban structure matters: Residential location, car dependence and travel behaviour. New York, NY: Routledge.
  50. Naess, P. (2011). "New urbanism" or metropolitan-level central- ization? A comparison of the influences of metropolitan-level and neighborhood-level urban form characteristics on travel behavior. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 4(1), 25-44. doi:10.5198/jtlu.v4i1.170
  51. Naess, P., Røe, P., & Larsen, S. (1995). Travelling distances, modal split and transportation energy in thirty residential areas in Oslo. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 38(3), 349-370. doi:10.1080/09640569512913
  52. Oregon Metro. (2011). State of the centers report. Retrieved from https://www.oregonmetro.gov/sites/default/files/2015/02/ 25/2011_state_of_the_centers_0.pdf.
  53. Oregon Metro. (2019). Transit-oriented development: Project investment criteria. Retrieved from https://www.oregonmetro. gov/sites/default/files/2019/02/05/Revised-Investment-Criteria- 2-5-19.pdf.
  54. Parr, J. (2004). The polycentric urban region: A closer inspec- tion. Regional Studies, 38(3), 231-240. doi:10.1080/ 003434042000211114
  55. Pereira, R. H. M., Nadalin, V., Monasterio, L., & Albuquerque, P. H. M. (2013). Urban centrality: A simple index. Geographical Analysis, 45(1), 77-89. doi:10.1111/gean.12002
  56. Porter, M. E. (2011). Competitive advantage of nations: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
  57. R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statis- tical computing [Software].
  58. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  59. Sabouri, S., Choi, D., Park, K., & Ameli, H. (2020). Definitions, types, and criteria of centers in planning practice: A review of 126 regional transportation plans in the U.S. Paper presented at the TRB 99th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
  60. Schwanen, T., Dieleman, F.M., & Dijst, M. (2003). Car use in Netherlands daily urban systems: Does polycentrism result in lower commute times? Urban Geography, 24(5), 410-430. doi: 10.2747/0272-3638.24.5.410
  61. Schwanen, T., Dijst, M., & Dieleman, F. M. (2004). Policies for urban form and their impact on travel: The Netherlands experi- ence. Urban Studies, 41(3), 579-603. doi:10.1080/ 0042098042000178690
  62. Scott, A. J. (1988). Metropolis: From the division of labor to urban form. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  63. Sun, B., He, Z., Zhang, T., & Wang, R. (2016). Urban spatial structure and commute duration: An empirical study of China. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 10(7), 638-644. doi:10.1080/15568318.2015.1042175
  64. Talen, E. (2013). Zoning for and against sprawl: The case for form-based codes. Journal of Urban Design, 18(2), 175-200. doi:10.1080/13574809.2013.772883
  65. Tsai, Y. H. (2005). Quantifying urban form: Compactness versus "sprawl." Urban Studies, 42(1), 141-161. doi:10.1080/ 0042098042000309748
  66. U.S. Census Bureau. (2015). Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) Program [Dataset]. Washington, DC: Author.
  67. U.S. Census Bureau. (n.d.). American Community Survey 5-year estimates, 2012-2016 population table [generated by Keunhyun Park].
  68. American FactFinder. Retrieved from http://factfinder.cen- sus.gov Utah Transit Authority. (2015). First/last mile strategies study. Retrieved from http://www2.rideuta.com/-/media/Files/About- UTA/Tiger-VIII/UTAFirst_LastMileFINALCOMP1.ashx?la=en. Vasanen, A. (2012). Functional polycentricity: Examining metropolitan spatial structure through the connectivity of urban sub-centres. Urban Studies, 49(16), 3627-3644. doi:10.1177/ 0042098012447000
  69. Yang, J., Xie, M., & Goh, T. N. (2011). Outlier identification and robust parameter estimation in a zero-inflated Poisson model. Journal of Applied Statistics, 38(2), 421-430. doi:10.1080/ 02664760903456426
  70. Zegras, C. (2010). The built environment and motor vehicle ownership and use: Evidence from Santiago de Chile. Urban Studies, 47(8), 1793-1817. doi:10.1177/0042098009356125
  71. Zhao, P., Diao, J., & Li, S. (2017). The influence of urban struc- ture on individual transport energy consumption in China's growing cities. Habitat International, 66, 95-105. doi:10.1016/j. habitatint.2017.06.001