A Fourth Wave of Populism ? (original) (raw)
Related papers
Populist Skirmishers: Frontrunners of Populist Radical Right in Poland
Politics and Governance, 2022
Mainstream parties, like PiS in Poland, have to cater to broad segments of society to sustain broad support. Cultivation of populist radical right ideologies of authoritarianism, traditionalism, religiosity, and nativism-all interlaced with gender as a nemesis and the nation as a deity-takes highly motivated, confrontational politicians who prepare the ground for radical populist ideas to take root in the electorate's minds, who mobilize voters through radicalization. This article introduces the concept of "populist skirmishers" to the literature on populism, adding this to Cas Mudde's basket of major mobilizing forces of populism, that is, a populist leader, a social movement, and a political party. Though it might be considered an unnecessary elevation of a profession that perverts the rules of civility in the public sphere, polarizes electorates, and does whatever it takes to derail the project of European integration, I argue that understanding the modus operandi and functions of populist skirmishers is indispensable to furthering our understanding of populism.
The Role and Significance of Populist Party Leaders in Poland
Politeja
The article is the first attempt at describing and comparing leaders of four most important populist groupings in Poland: Samoobrona, PiS, LPR, Kukiz’15. It makes three primary contributions to the literature of the subject. In its theoretical aspect, it shows that the literature concerning the analysed issue is still at the stage of being developed. When it comes to the analysis of data, it was found that populist party leaders played an important political role in Poland. In the case of Samoobrona, PiS and Kukiz’15 they played a key role in the process of origination of their parties, while in PiS they still hold a very strong intra-party position.
Polish Right-Wing Populism in the Era of Social Media
Problems of Post-Communism, 2018
By employing the concepts of opportunity structure and discursive opportunities as a theoretical background, this paper aims to identify and analyze the factors that may have led to the breakthroughs of two right-wing political actors in Poland in 2014-2015: Paweł Kukiz and his Kukiz'15 movement and Janusz Korwin-Mikke and his political initiatives. In our study we focused on several issues: the political, economic, and social context; the visibility provided by traditional media; widespread usage of social media; correspondence of the content of messages to expectations and political preferences; and radicalization of the agenda of the Law and Justice party (PiS), which contributed to the resonance and legitimacy of populist claims.
The key messages of this paper can be summarized in three statements: First, the new wave of populism, as neopopulism, has been shaped in the current age of information society first of all in the terms of 'cultural' globalization as identity politics. Second, since the outbreak of global crisis in the late 2000s there has been an 'alienation' between the Core and the Periphery in the EU with very marked features in the 'East', in New Member States as widespread disappointment of populations with the results of EU membership. Third, Poland and Hungary have been pioneering in this process of divergence from the EU mainstream and in the emergence of the anti-EU populist elites, so they represent the classical case of Eupopulism in the Eastern periphery in the EU. Thus, this paper focuses on the specificity of neopopulism in NMS within the EU first of all by analysing the emergence of authoritarian populism in Poland and Hungary.
The Polish and Hungarian Blind Alley of Populism Compared
2018
The key messages of this paper can be summarized in three statements: First, the new wave of populism, as neopopulism, has been shaped in the current age of information society first of all in the terms of ‘cultural’ globalization as identity politics. Second, since the outbreak of global crisis in the late 2000s there has been an ‘alienation’ between the Core and the Periphery in the EU with very marked features in the ‘East’, in New Member States as widespread disappointment of populations with the results of EU membership. Third, Poland and Hungary have been pioneering in this process of divergence from the EU mainstream and in the emergence of the anti-EU populist elites, so they represent the classical case of Eupopulism in the Eastern periphery in the EU. Thus, this paper focuses on the specificity of neopopulism in NMS within the EU first of all by analysing the emergence of authoritarian populism in Poland and Hungary.
Polish Political Science Review
Th eir scientifi c specialization covers two research disciplines: political and administration sciences as well as media and social communication. It is a perfect combination, because political communication combines several epistemological and methodological perspectives, giving the authors an opportunity to demonstrate a high quality interdisciplinary approach. Th e structure of the monograph consists of an introduction, three substantive chapters and a conclusion. Th e volume has been supplemented with a list of fi gures, tables, abbreviations and an extensive bibliography. As a result, we are dealing with-from the editorial point of view-a carefully prepared work, with a very clear structure and an easily comprehensible presentation form of the research outcomes. Research on populism and populist political communication has been carried out mainly in Western Europe, due to the long tradition of the political activity of populist parties. Th e English-language scientifi c literature has covered, to a lesser extent, Central and Eastern Europe countries, including Poland. Populism as a subject of research in Polish literature, however, has been present since early 1990s, which the authors are well aware of. Th erefore they extensively recall previous studies on populist political communication (pp. 37-38), what leads them to a conclusion about scarcity of "systematic empirical approach". Th us, the authors locate their work in a signifi cant research gap, related to the defi cit of studies based on empirical results. An additional novelty and an essential objective of the book is to draw attention to the relationship between media content and populism, as well as to analyze the impact of populist communication on citizens. Two factors are important for the creation of the book. Th e reviewed book is related to the research project titled "Populist political communication: political messages, media coverage and audience feedback", fi nanced by the Polish National Science Centre. Additionally, the book draws on the interdisciplinary research network called COST Action "Populist Political Communication in Europe: Comprehending the Challenge of Mediat
A large-scale ethnography of populism in the Czech Republic, Germany and Poland
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), 2022
Populist rebellion against modernity in 21st-century Eastern Europe 3.1.3. Polarisation, antagonism, division? Narratives on the condition of Polish society 3.1.3.1. Narratives of differences and divisions 3.1.3.2. Social antagonisms and polarisation 3.1.3.3. Alienation, individualism, collectivism 3.1.4. Tales of an ideal state: politics, citizenship, values 3.1.4.1. Conceptions of an ideal state 3.1.4.2. Politicians and the ideal of political culture Ideal political culture Values, politics, and the politics of values: freedom 3.