Trade and Human Security in ASEAN: Toward Deeper Linkage? (original) (raw)
Related papers
ASEAN: Integration, Internal Dynamics and External Relations
European Parliament (AFET), 2013
Throughout its evolution, ASEAN has consistently maintained its attachment to the full respect of national sovereignty and the principle of non-interference in internal affairs, which translates into consensual decision-making, political rather than legally-binding agreements and the lack of sanctions for non-compliance. A major breakthrough in terms of institutionalisation came about with the signing of the ASEAN Charter of 2007, which has enhanced ASEAN's standing as a rule-based organisation and approximated it somewhat to structures typical of the EU. Unfortunately, the persistence of consensual decision-making and non-confrontational habits has slowed down some of ASEAN's integration projects and hindered the development of a human rights mechanism. Moreover the ASEAN integration project is imperilled by a number of structural factors, currently aggravated by the divisive influence of China in the economic and security field.
ASEAN Economic Integration: Features, Fulfillments, Failures and the Future (No. 69
The 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations, ASEAN, is arguably the most durable and successful regional grouping in the developing world. Established in 1967, it has contributed greatly to regional harmony and prosperity. ASEAN is characterized by great internal diversity, generally high economic growth, and a reluctance to establish a strong supranational structure. Beginning in 1976-with its five original members-ASEAN began to move toward economic cooperation and integration, initially with a focus on merchandise trade. In the 1990s, it added focus on services, investment, and labor. And in the past decade-now including all of Southeast Asia-ASEAN broadened cooperation on macroeconomic and financial issues, many of these together with its Northeast Asian neighbors-the "Plus 3" of the People's Republic of China, Japan, and the Republic of Korea. Members adopted what may appear to be formal preferential trade arrangements. But in practice these are usually multilateralized. ASEAN informally embraces what is sometimes termed "open regionalism." However, there is little likelihood in the foreseeable future that this will evolve into a deep EU-style economic integration behind a common external trade regime, despite a commitment to forming an ASEAN Economic Community beginning 2015.
European Union and ASEAN: A Comparison
European Union (EU) and Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) provide one of the most successful examples of regional integrations, in a completely different milieu and historical background. In Europe, post 1945, regionalism emerged out of gradual process of integration from a six member organization to today 27 members European Union; from an intergovernmental organization to a supranational entity. On the other hand ASEAN was established in 1967 realizing the fact that internal conflicts will lead to external interference that will aggravate internal tensions and not motivated by a sense of common identity. This paper attempts a comparative analysis of European Union and ASEAN
EU: ASEAN's Role Model for Economic Integration?
On 16 June 1995, the European Commission formally declared support for regional economic integration efforts among developing countries (European Commission 1995). This was not something new. Ever since the 1960s, part of the European Union (EU)'s external policy has been to spread its model of economic integration across the globe (Garelli 2012: 4). Regardless of intentions, however, the EU's economic integration experience is atypical and cannot be transferred wholesale to other regions (Tripathi 2013: 1394). This paper examines the degree of EU replicability in relation to the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). The task at hand is twofold. The first issue concerns whether or not the EU economic integration experience is sui generis visa -vis ASEAN. Secondly, if it is indeed discovered that certain elements of the EU is replicable, there remains the question of whether or not ASEAN can realize them. This paper argues that in light of ASEAN economic integration, certain aspects of the EU experience are indeed relevant, but it is extremely implausible that ASEAN is willing and able to replicate them.
2018
Regionalism has been major issue in global political economy in the recent decades. This essay emphasizes on ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) as one example of a regional association which is moving toward economic integration, especially after the WTO had been set up. It will try to find out the motivation of ASEAN for wanting an economic integration. The question here will be whether the implementation of the WTO or the emergence of economic powers in Asia such as China and India has been the reason for ASEAN to move into an integrated economy. From here I shall argue that in ASEAN’s case, the latter seems to be more convincing than the former. Having discussion among scholars, from both optimistic and pessimistic perspectives regarding the success of ASEAN Economic Community (AEC), it can be argued that the implementation of the AEC may represent the realisation of ASEAN as a single market. The ongoing process for the implementation of the AEC illustrates ASEAN’s mo...
ASEAN and the European Union: Lessons in Integration
The European Union (EU) is arguably the primary dialogue partner of the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN). Informal relations begun in 1972 were formalised in 1977. Since then, interactions between the two regional blocs have reflected ASEAN's concerns and priorities which evolved and changed in tandem with ASEAN's own growth and development.
The 'ASEAN' Way: Bedrock of Regional Integration or Mere Impediment?
This paper explores the questions whether and in how far ASEAN is a success for Southeast Asia, which challenges the regional organization faces and whether it should move to deeper integration in the future. Following a brief overview of the historic development of ASEAN (part II), the achievements and difficulties of the regional organization are summarized (part III). Against this background, the paper analyzes whether and how accomplishments might be realized in the future and in which way ASEAN might overcome impediments on its way to deeper regional integration. The analysis ends with a summary of the main findings and a conclusion (part IV).