'Yang Jia and China's Unpopular Criminal Justice System,'' (original) (raw)
Related papers
Miscarriages of Justice and the Construction of Criminality in the People’s Republic of China
Amicus Curiae
Another high-profile miscarriage of justice was reported recently by the media in China, highlighting widespread issues concerning torture and other police malpractices within the Chinese criminal justice system. Drawing from analysis in my book on the Construction of Guilt in China, this Note outlines the key drawbacks of the Chinese criminal process which contribute to wrongful convictions, namely that none of the legal institutions exhibits the autonomy to check the credibility of the evidence impartially. Alongside the problems caused by miscarriages of justice, they are also indicative of the symptoms of a weak criminal justice system, thereby opening up opportunities for future reforms. Keywords: miscarriages of justice; China; criminal justice; case construction.
Policing, Punishment, and the Individual: Criminal Justice in China
Law <html_ent glyph="@amp;" ascii="&"/> Social Inquiry, 1995
... 5 Stephen B. Young, “The Concept of Justice in Pre-Imperial China,” in Richard W. Wilson ... “Gonganbu guanyu zhuanfa Beijingshi gonganju 'guanyu changkuang qiye ... 32 Zhang Fanshen, “Qiantan Zhongguo laogai gongmo tese de yuanquan” (On the Sources of the Theoretical ...
International Journal of Law Libraries, 1980
On July 1, 1979, during the Second Session of the Fifth National People's Congress of the People's Republic of China (PRC), seven important laws were passed. Among these new laws were complete codes of criminal law and criminal procedure.The approval of these laws—particularly the codes of criminal law and procedure—is, to anyone with more than a casual interest in the PRC's legal system, an act of great significance. The Chinese themselves certainly view this event as being quite important and have devoted considerable time and effort to propagandizing its meaning for their society.
2019
On June 15, 2015, China’s official media launched an unprecedented public disinformation campaign against Wang Yu, a commercial lawyer who had emerged as a bold rights activist in the several years following her imprisonment by the Railway police for what she asserted was a false charge of beating someone on a station platform in Tianjin, a coastal city near Beijing. The coordinated nationwide attack, labeled by many of her supporters as a “smear campaign,” included coverage in official newspapers, including People’s Daily, online at People’s Net, and on CCTV, China’s multi-channel TV network. The articles alleged that this petite ex-prisoner had beaten someone to death, and then the official press “sarcastically” questioned whether she could be an authentic advocate to “represent justice and human rights” (B1610).
A False Promise of Fair Trials: A Case Study of China's Malleable Criminal Procedure Law
China revised its Criminal Procedure Law in 1996 adopting an adversarial-style trial model and granting remarkable procedural safeguards to the accused. Many have been tempted to conclude that this new law is capable of ensuring fair trials for criminal defendants and thus could improve China’s record of human rights protection. This article will argue that, despite some progresses in formality, the new law has been poorly implemented and has failed to fulfill its promise of fair trials. This article will examine two high-profile cases in detail to demonstrate how procedural safeguards prescribed by the new law are frequently manipulated by judges, either to pursue efficiency and convenience or to accommodate outside influences such as political concerns, public outrage, personal friendship, or even bribes. These manipulations have caused the essence of fair trials intended to be created by the 1996 law to be largely nonexistent in modern proceedings, while at the same time allowing interferers to freely produce wrongful verdicts and disproportionate sentences. The reality is that many of these problems are caused by institutional flaws in China’s criminal justice system, particularly the absence of a responsible judiciary. However, instead of pinning hopes for reform on unrealistic constitutional changes, this article proposes a technical approach that focuses on restructuring the 1996 law to make criminal trials less vulnerable to manipulation and interference. This technical solution would help to ensure fair trials by relying on the procedure itself, rather than on unreliable judges.