Pioneers, settlers, aliens, exiles: the decolonisation of white identity in Zimbabwe (original) (raw)
Related papers
Nation, Race And History In Zimbabwean Politics
Making Nations, Creating Strangers, 2007
... intellectual community. One critique from a group of prominent African American progressives criti-cised a twisted kind of Black 'solidarity'that mirrors the 'patriotism' of the white right in the US. Furthermore they condemned ...
Zimbabwe: The Ethnicisation of Zanu and the Downfall of Ndabaningi Sithole (1963-2000)
Conflict Studies Quarterly
This article is an exposition of the transformation of ZANU from being, primarily, a nationalist movement into an ethnic oriented party. Since its formation in 1963, ZANU was gripped by ethnicity, resulting in factions and contestations developing among party members. These contestations developed into open conflicts along tribal lines. The paper argues that ethnicity was so acute among ZANU party members to an extent that divisions were clearly drawn along the Shona sub-ethnic groups of Manyika (easterners), Karanga (southerners), and Zezuru (northerners). The competition for leadership positions and the fighting among members of these ethnic groups resulted in the death of some members of the party and the expulsion of others from the party. It is argued in the article that the persecution of Ndabaningi Sithole and his fallout as the ZANU president was a result of the ethnicisation of ZANU and the liberation struggle. The removal of Sithole as the party president and his replacement by Robert Mugabe exhibits these contestations among the Zezuru, Karanga and Manyika ethnic groups. We argue that the deposition of Sithole from ZANU in 1975 and his castigation as a "sell-out" and "tribalist" was a ploy by Robert Mugabe and other ZANU leaders to get rid of him and to replace him along ethnic grounds. The ethnic card was deployed to serve selfish political interests. It is these ethnic contestations and fighting which also brewed conflict and enmity between Mugabe in particular and Ndabaningi Sithole, among other factors. This hatred was clearly displayed later in the struggle for supremacy between Sithole's new party, ZANU-Ndonga and Robert Mugabe's ZANU-PF. It is stressed in the article that this enmity also culminated in the denial of a hero status to Sithole when he died in 2000. We also
The 1987 Zimbabwean National Unity Accord
With the attainment of uhuru there was the institutionalisation of the independence contract in which all, the people, the masses, were supposed to pray at the altar of nation building and development, and the articulation of sectional class, social, community, ethnic and gender interests was frowned upon as selfish and subversive.
Since the attainment of independence ZANU PF, a liberation party, has been at the helm of government and decision-making in Zimbabwe. Despite the emergence of opposition political parties, the party has maintained its grip on power. The turn of the new millennium saw the emergence of a strong opposition political party, the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) and independent candidates that gave a strong challenge to ZANU PF dominance. In essence, despite this challenge ZANU PF has maintained a tight grip on power, claiming to use democratic means to retain its power. It is the purpose of this paper to provide an analysis of survival strategies adopted by ZANU PF in entrenching and sustaining itself in power in the face of opposition forces, not only those outside the ZANU PF environment but also in intra-party opposition. As the paper argues, there are a number of factors that have led to the dominance of ZANU PF ranging from issues of political culture not only in ZANU PF but also within the Zimbabwe populace to issues of using a stick and carrot approach. In the final analysis, the paper will posit on the future of not only ZANU PF but Zimbabwean politics in general particularly in the face of the continuing deepening crisis.
Elections in Zimbabwe: The ZANU (PF) Hegemony and its Incipient Decline
African Journal of Political Science, 1997
This contribution seeks to explain the ruling ZANU (PF) party's electoral hegemony by outlining and analysing Zimbabwe 'sfive general elections since 1979 and the two presidential elections since 1990. In this regard, the paper argues that the ruling party is experiencing a gradual decline in elite cohesion which is manifested in the electoral challenge of independent candidates coming from the ruling party itself. This phenomenon of independent candidates could have far-reaching consequences in overcoming the present state of weak political opposition in Zimbabwe. The paper therefore suggests a scenario in which a viable opposition could come from a splinter group inside the ruling ZANU (PF) itself not unlike the major ZAPU/ZANU split of 1963.
The Lancaster House Agreement and the post - independence state in Zimbabwe
1991
Every colonisation and decolonisation process must of necessity be fraught with antagonistic contradictions which may differ in terms of their character and depth (the form) but not their essence. The class contradictions which were perhaps necessarily hidden in the Zimbabwean decolonisation process-but which now have become more open-need to be examined and laid bare by an objective social science. For, never is a social system in a state of permanent rest. So, the constant motion, its driving force and its direction need to be understood and used for the continual and betterment of the condition of human existence. This essay which characterizes the post-independence state in Zimbabwe as a neo-colonial one par excellence, holds that the armed struggle for the independence of Zimbabwe was led by a militant nationalist petty bourgeoisie whose material objective was to set itself up as a local dominant bloc presiding over a capitalist social economy dominated by imperialism. The question of a profound transformation of the society-sometimes, many times, articulated in the discourses of these nationalists and some social scientists as "a socialist transformation"-was never seriously on the agenda. The consequent Lancaster House Constitutional Conference of 1979, which brought about the Lancaster House Agreement, was simply the climax which started the "sealing" of an important class alliance that would ensure the reproduction of the heavily imperialist dominated socioeconomic structure and that would demobilise any popular-based attempt at a profound transformation of the society. This process-of course-is still fraught with deadly contradictions.
‘Echoing Silences\': Ethnicity in post-colonial Zimbabwe, 1980-2007
African Journal on Conflict Resolution, 2008
In spite of its rare entry into both official and public discourses about contemporary Zimbabwe, ethnicity, alongside race, has continued to shape and influence the economic, social, and political life of Zimbabwe since the achievement of independence in 1980. In this article we argue that whilst post-independence Zimbabwe has since the days of the Gukurahundi war (1982-1986) not experienced serious ethnic-based wars or political instability, there is serious ethnic polarisation in the country and ethnicity remains one of the challenges to the survival of both the state and the country. This ethnic polarisation is to be explained mainly in terms of the broader failure by the state to develop an effective response to the political economy of ethnicity inherited from the colonial past. * The subtitle of this article is derived from Alexander Kanengoni's brilliant, semi-biographical novel about the rarely discussed violence and trauma of the war of independence, Echoing Silences (Baobab Books, Harare, 1997).
David Kaulemu (ed.) Imagining Citizenship in Zimbabwe. Harare: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung, 2011
"Robert Mugabe’s party, Zanu-PF, which took power at independence in 1980, has managed to retain its political legitimacy in large parts of the country, despite a prolonged economic nightmare and longstanding and incontrovertible evidence of political violence and human rights abuses. In the same way that the NATO powers seem puzzled by the failure of Muammar Gaddafi to shut up shop and leave Libya, there is evident international puzzlement and frustration at Mugabe’s ability to retain power in Zimbabwe. Outside of academia (and even within it), there has been little significant conversation about how his party has remained in place: coercion has been the explanation consistently offered. And yet, it is clear that Zanu-PF did not lose popular support in many rural areas, despite the violent (and apparently rigged) parliamentary election of 2000 and presidential election of 2002. Neither partisan, oppressive behaviour by the state, nor unprecedented economic collapse, significantly undermined rural people’s willingness to vote for the primary perpetrators of the political violence, Zanu-PF. The MDC, meanwhile, found its platform defending citizenship, civil society and property rights seemed too often to fall on fallow ground. Why has the MDC not been able to build up a stronger sense in Zimbabwe of the citizen and a citizen’s rights vis-à-vis the state?"