The UNIDO World Productivity Database: An Overview (original) (raw)
Related papers
res publication, 2014
This present paper makes an attempt towards measuring technical progress through estimating input coefficients (technical coefficients) across various years. Such a measurement would shed considerable light on the trends in the rate of technical progress as an important source of growth in the Indian economy and lay to rest various speculations about the role of liberalization in promoting technological progress in the Indian economy. Such an effort would also make it possible to compare the two significant phases of the Indian economy: the 'inwardlooking' phase and the 'outward-looking' phase. In the present paper many tools have been used to find out technological change and to identify the key sectors such as Chenery-Watanabe Categorization, in which, all the sectors of the economy are classified into four categories on the basis of U-W ratios. The study clearly finds that primary sector have low backward and low forward linkages with tertiary sector, high linkages with itself and average linkages with secondary sector. Secondary sector has low linkages with primary sector but high linkages with tertiary sector. Electricity alone has high linkages with all the three sectors. The capital intensive basic industries like iron and steel, electricity, non ferrous basic metals, construction, etc. are supposed to play the role of engine in the process of growth. Investment in these sectors can speed up the industrialization process; as such sectors will stimulate greater economic activities in other sectors.
Rationale for a follow-up study focusing on economic productivity
Food and nutrition bulletin, 2005
Past studies of nutrition, human capital formation, and economic productivity have been limited by the fact that biomedical researchers and economists work largely in isolation, with loss of complementarity. Biomedical researchers are faulted for not adequately addressing bias and measurement issues and for naive analyses and interpretation of results, whereas economists are criticized for using simplistic nutrition and physiological measures and for relying on statistical methods rather than experimental designs. To avoid these problems, a multidisciplinary team of biomedical investigators and economists undertook a follow-up study in 2002-04 of a cohort of young men and women, who participated as young children in a randomized community trial of nutrition supplementation carried out from 1969-77 Previous studies, particularly the original trial and a 1988-89 follow- up, are described to provide an overview of the data available for linkage with the 2002-04 follow-up. Key results f...
‘Rationale for a follow-up focusing on economic productivity’
Food and nutrition bulletin
Past studies of nutrition, human capital formation, and economic productivity have been limited by the fact that biomedical researchers and economists work largely in isolation, with loss of complementarity. Biomedical researchers are faulted for not adequately addressing bias and measurement issues and for naive analyses and interpretation of results, whereas economists are criticized for using simplistic nutrition and physiological measures and for relying on statistical methods rather than experimental designs. To avoid these problems, a multidisciplinary team of biomedical investigators and economists undertook a follow-up study in 2002-04 of a cohort of young men and women, who participated as young children in a randomized community trial of nutrition supplementation carried out from 1969-77 Previous studies, particularly the original trial and a 1988-89 follow- up, are described to provide an overview of the data available for linkage with the 2002-04 follow-up. Key results f...
Alternative Productivity Measures 1
2012
1 This paper is an updated and revised version of Escribano and Guasch (2004, 2005, 2008) based on a selection of the recent results obtained in the background working papers written for the investment climate assessments (ICA) of the World Bank on 42 develo Madagascar, Malawi, Niger, Tanzania, Zambia, Burkina Faso, Uganda, Mali, Kenya, Senegal, Mauritania, Bangladesh, Honduras, Pakistan, Cameroon, India, Bolivia, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Morocco, Indonesia, Ecuador, El Salvador, Egypt, Namibia, Turkey, Algeria, Colombia, Brazil, Mexico, Botswana, Costa Rica, South Africa, Swaziland, Croatia, Chile, Mauritius, Pakistan and Peru. the TFP results that we presen t here are maintained in all these countries. Heisnam Singh and Rodolfo Stucchi for their excellent research assistance and to D. Ackerberg, Levinsohn for the suggestions g suggestions of Paulo Correa, Luke Haggarty, Danny Leipziger, Eduardo Ley, Marialisa Motta, Jose Guillherme Reis, Isabel Sánchez and Stefka Slavova, f...
Productivity performance in developing countries
2005
This paper has not been formally edited. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization concerning ...
The Conference Board, International Productivity Monitor http://www. csls. ca/ipm/19/IPM-19-vanark. pdf, 2010
The recession left its mark on global productivity, which fell in 2009. The productivity growth differential between the United States and Europe increased dramatically in 2009. Average long-term growth of labour productivity in advanced economies has stalled since 2000. The gradual improvement in world productivity is due to emerging and developing economies. In particular the long-term increase in TFP growth reflects a strengthening of the efficiency with which emerging and developing economies ...