The Left Ventricular Dysfunction Questionnaire: Italian translation and validation (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Severe Heart Failure Questionnaire: Italian translation and linguistic validation
Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene, 2008
The quality of life (QoL) is an important outcome indicator for heart failure management. As the use of a validate questionnaire in a different cultural context can affect data interpretation our main objective is the Italian translation and linguistic validation of the Severe Heart Failure Questionnaire (SHF) and its comparison with the MLHF (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure) Questionnaire. The SHF and "The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire" were translated. A consensus involving parallel back-translations was established among a group of cardiologists, psychologists and biostatisticians. SHF and MLHF were both administrated to a sample of 50 patients. The patients' median age was 63 years. Ace inhibitors therapy was administered in 88% of cases and betablockers in 56% of cases. Finally the Italian version of SHF correlates well with MLHF for all domains, except life satisfaction SHF domain. The Italian version of the SHF correlates well with MLHF f...
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire: Italian translation and validation
Italian Heart Journal Official Journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology, 2003
Background. Several studies have demonstrated that patients affected by heart failure have a compromised quality of life and, in the last few years, "health-related quality of life" has become an important outcome indicator for the evaluation of heart failure treatment and a basis for the improvement of its strategies. Methods. The translation into Italian of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), a new, 23 item, disease-specific health status instrument for patients with congestive heart failure, and its subsequent validation by asking 50 consecutive patients in our heart failure outpatient clinic to answer it. The KCCQ was compared to the "Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire" (MLHF). Results. The Italian version of the KCCQ correlates well with the MLHF for all domains with the exclusion of symptom stability score and MLHF emotional domain. However, the KCCQ, due to its multiple domains, provided more detailed information about the patients' status, and identified the more compromised ones. Conclusions. The KCCQ appears to be a valid and reliable instrument for the assessment of a patient's quality of life and the degree of limitations imposed upon him/her by the disease. When compared to the MLHF, the KCCQ, however, is somewhat more sensitive in identifying more compromised patients. This capacity could be advantageously used for the identification of clinical changes in future trials and lead to a better planning of new therapeutic interventions.
Instruments to assess quality of life in patients with heart failure
Fisioterapia em Movimento, 2015
Introduction : Heart failure (HF) is a complex clinical syndrome representing the common final pathway of various heart diseases. It is characterized by low exercise tolerance, low survival rates and deteriorated quality of life. Several studies mention Quality of Life (QoL) as an important source of information on how disease truly affects patient's lives. In this context, the assessment of QoL is extremely important to provide data that support the choice of a therapeutic strategy and the assessment of the effectiveness of a treatment. Objectives : This study aimed to investigate and identify the most appropriate and widely used instrument for the assessment of quality of life in patients with HF. Methods : We searched the databases of Lilacs, Medline, Pubmed, Scielo and CAPES to identify relevant articles published in English and Portuguese between 2000 and 2010. Results : We found 25 papers that described, quoted or used instruments for the assessment of QoL in patients with...
Introduction: The present study aimed to determine the relationship between New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification and disease characteristics on the quality of life scores and the distribution of the scores at different stages of Heart Failure (HF). Materials and Methods: A total of 150 patients with HF participated in this cross-sectional study. The method of data collection was interview based on NYHA classification and using the validated Persian version of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (PKCCQ). Results: According to NYHA classification, 10% of patients were classified as mild HF, 16% as moderate HF, 63% as severe HF, and 11% as very severe HF. Significant differences were observed for total score and the component scores of PKCCQ among four stages of the disease (P<0.001). By comparing the PKCCQ total score and three domains in male and female groups, it was revealed that sex cannot affect quality of life based on PKCCQ total score and its functional areas (P=0.18). Conclusion: Distribution of the quality of life scores in patients with different stages of HF showed that quality of life scores overlap in the severe and very severe stages. Classifying the disease using NYHA classification cannot distinct patients with HF according to impairments in their health status between severe and very severe stages. In addition, the degree of education is the factor that may affect the quality of life.
Journal of Cardiology, 2009
Background: Major characteristics of symptomatic patients with heart failure are exercise intolerance, poor prognosis, and poor quality of life (QOL). However, most QOL questionnaires are applicable for patients with mild to moderate heart failure, and are not sufficiently sensitive to discriminate between patients with NYHA classes III and IV. Therefore, it is necessary to prepare a questionnaire focused on patients with severe heart failure. Objectives: We developed a Japanese version of the Maugeri Foundation Respiratory Failure (MRF28) questionnaire and assessed validity and reliability of MRF28 in heart failure patients. Methods: The MRF28 questionnaire was evaluated in 124 patients with heart failure (NYHA classes: I, 24; II, 31; III, 52; IV, 17). Reliability was evaluated by internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Validity was determined by correlation with World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) questionnaire and physiological parameters. Results: The MRF28 showed high internal consistency and reproducibility. The total score and subscores were all increased with the progress of heart failure. The total score could differentiate patients among NYHA II, III, and IV, but could not between NYHA I and II. However, all subscores and total score changed consistently with changes in symptoms of heart failure.
Measuring quality of life in patients with heart failure
Srpski arhiv za celokupno lekarstvo, 2005
INTRODUCTION The quality of life in patients with heart failure is diminished by symptoms of disease, affected social connections, frequent hospitalizations, side effects caused by medication, and costs of treatment borne by the patient himself. OBJECTIVE The objective of this research was to measure the quality of life of patients with heart failure and assess any potential changes during a six-month period. METHOD This research is a follow-up study, and comprised 56 patients who were treated from September 1998 to August 1999 at the Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases of The Clinical Center of Serbia. During the first hospitalization, an initial baseline measurement of quality of life was conducted. The measurement was then repeated after three and six months, during check-ups. The measurement was conducted by using a special questionnaire for patients suffering from heart disorders, the "Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire." RESULTS The results showed a ...
International journal of current research and review, 2022
Introduction: The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) is one of the most extensively used heart failure patient quality of life questionnaires (HF). It includes physical and emotional scores, as well as a total score. However, its factor structure has been questioned, and alternatives proposed, including a third factor expressing a social dimension. This Survey used to monitor population health, assess treatment outcomes, and estimate illness burden. Aims: Validation and testing of the SF-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire (QOLQ) and the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) were the main objectives of this work in CHF patients. To identify the psychometric properties of the quality-of-life questionnaires (SF-36) and MLHFQ questionnaire among congestive heart failure patients Methodology: The quasi experimental study was conducted in those individuals who has suffered with heart failure (n= 36). These patients were admitted at the FIC, Faisalabad. The teach-back technique was introduced to teach about the self-care to improve the QOL of the participants. Every participant was administered the SF-36 and MLHFQ after intervention Post-test-1 was conducted at 30 days after accomplishment of the intervention with filling of both tools collected by the researcher/ facilitator on one-month clinical follow-up visit. Posttest-2 was conducted at 90 days after intervention at each participant on three-month follow-up visit. Results: The researcher were evaluated the questionnaires psychometric parameters, as well as the extent to which one may rely on the accuracy of a measurement, computation, or specification. (Internal consistency, test-retest analysis, and inter-item correlation). Exploratory factor analysis was used to determine the construct validity. Conclusion: It is found that the Urdu version of the Questionnaires (SF-36) and the MLHFQ questionnaire were proven to be a trustworthy and valid tool for improving quality of life in patients with congestive heart failure. With the use of these versions of the scale, assessing patient QOL, performance, has become smoother and readmission frequency in congestive heart failure Patients would become lesser.
The journal of Tehran Heart Center, 2018
Background: Unraveling the relationship between health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) seems essential due to the increasing importance of quality of life evaluations in patients with heart failure (HF) and the use of the ICF for comparative purposes. The aim of this study is to identify and compare the content of HRQOL instruments for HF using the ICF coding system. Methods : In a 2-stage design, first we will identify all measures used to assess HRQOL for patients with HF and second we will compare the content of those measures using the ICF coding system. Systematic search will be performed in in MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Scopus databases using a combination of free texts and MeSH terms between January 1960 and January 2017. All instruments will be linked to the ICF separately by 2 reviewers according to 10 linking rules developed for this purpose. The degree of agreement between the reviewer...