Which is More Consequential for Income Disparity among College Graduates: Fields of Study or Institutional Selectivity? (original) (raw)
Related papers
Earnings of a Lifetime: Comparing Women and Men with College and Graduate Degrees
InContext, 2009
While women are now more likely to complete four-year college degrees than men, it is less clear whether their higher levels of education will translate into closing the wage gap. Using synthetic lifetime earnings calculations, this article underscores the fact that men still earn considerably more than women at all levels of education. We also see that, while women seem more likely to complete degrees in fields that are associated with relatively low lifetime earnings (such as education), men still receive substantially higher incomes than women with similar educational backgrounds.
The purpose of this study is to examine the extent to which the magnitude of disparities in the labor market outcomes of college graduates stemming from socioeconomic background varies according to institutional selectivity. The data used for the study are drawn from the National Center for Education Statistics’ Education Longitudinal Study of 2002, which followed a 2002 cohort of high school sophomores for ten years. The results suggest that socioeconomic background did impact the wages and earnings of students who earned their bachelor’s degree during this timeframe and that the magnitude of these disparities varies appreciably across institutional selectivity tiers.
Decomposing gender differences in college student earnings
Psychology, 2010
Despite the increasing coverage and prevalence of equality legislation and the general alignment of key determining characteristics such as educational attainment, gender differentials continue to persist in labour market outcomes, including earnings. Recently, evidence has been found supporting the role of typically unobserved non-cognitive factors in explaining these gender differentials. We contribute to this literature by testing whether gender gaps in the earnings expectations of a representative group of Irish university ...
Explaining Gender Pay Gap Among Recent College Graduates – Discrimination or Supply Side Factors ?
2014
In this study we set out to investigate why university educated women receive lower earnings in the Swedish labor market. The different data sources from registered data and hiring experiment gave us a unique opportunity to directly study the role discrimination and supply side factors in explaining early career gender pay gap. Using registered data for childless and single recent college graduates-a group expected to have similar labor market commitmentwe found a gender pay gap of 11 % upon entry into labor market. Out of the total gap we found that more than 76 % of the gap is explained by pre-market factors, primarily field of education. Adding controls for job related factors increases the explained gap to about 80 %. The gender difference in earning that is unexplained by the above factors is rather small ranging between 2.2 to 2.7 %. Using another data set focusing on the job hiring process by sending fictitious applications to real job openings in the Swedish labor market we ...
Gendered dimensions of educational premium disadvantage in earnings in USA, 2019
GeoJournal, 2022
earnings is higher when male-versus-female ratio increases for those majoring in science/engineering, science and engineering-related and business degrees. Greater gender parity, however, is noted when more men major in Education-a sub-field largely deemed as feminine. This research calls for focused policy interventions toward encouraging more women in STEM and science/engineering disciplines, along with strategic programs to help attract more women into working full-time-one of the several ways toward bridging the earnings gap.
In Search of the Glass Ceiling: Gender and Earnings Growth among US College Graduates in the 1990s
2011
Gender-typical educational choices and lower rates of earnings growth, or the "glass ceiling," are widely believed to explain why older women earn far less than observably similar men. Using large panels drawn from the NSF National Survey of College Graduates and other data representative of college-educated workers from the 1990s, I search for differential growth rates predicted by both human capital and discrimination models. To the contrary, this study finds similar average rates of earnings growth for women and men across numerous specifications, suggesting that the gender gap in earnings is determined by factors already present early in the career; however, changes in educational choices explain only a tiny fraction of between-cohort narrowing of the gender gap. Further exploration reveals slower earnings growth by women within only two groups: The first is young mothers, who experience slower earnings growth during the early career relative to men the same age, but then more than compensate with faster growth later in their careers. The second is the group of women with exceptionally high earnings levels; relative to men the same age with similarly high levels of attainment, women are underrepresented among workers winning the largest promotions. This phenomenon affects a very small, but potentially influential, subset of women facing a glass ceiling at the very top of the career ladder.
In this paper, we examine whether investments in higher education have contributed to changes in occupational inequality by focusing on the impact of college completion rates on movement into desirable occupations between 1983 and 2002. Since forces generating inequality vary by gender, race, and ethnicity, we examine trends for white, black, and Hispanic men and women in our study. Utilizing Ordinary Least Squares Regression on data from 20 Current Population surveys, we find a modest decrease in both gender and racial inequality in access to desirable occupations and an increase in inequality between His- panics and members of the other groups. College com- pletion accounts for the progress made by white women and for the declines among Hispanic men. It does not explain changes for African Americans, either between men and women or when compared to whites.
Education is thought to be the pathway to success for disadvantaged groups. Given that young women now match or surpass men's educational achievements on many measures, how do they fare in terms of equal earnings? Would further educational changes matter for closing any existing gap? Analyzing data from the National Educational Longitudinal Survey, the author found that college-educated men in their mid-20s already earn, on average, about 7,000moreperyearthandocollege−educatedwomen.Thefindingssuggestthatthisgapwouldstillbesubstantial−−about7,000 more per year than do college-educated women. The findings suggest that this gap would still be substantial--about 7,000moreperyearthandocollege−educatedwomen.Thefindingssuggestthatthisgapwouldstillbesubstantial−−about4,400 per year--if women and men had similar educational credentials, scores on standardized tests, fields of study, and degrees from colleges of similar selectivity. Although women's gains in education may have been central to narrowing the gender gap in income historically, gender differences in fields of study continue to disadvantage women. Moreover, gender differences in work-related factors are more important than are educational differences for understanding contemporary income inequality among young workers.