A Comparative Analysis of Federal Agencies' Integration of Equity and Diversity Practices Addressing Minority Representation in Senior Executive Service (original) (raw)

Mimetic Influence on Minority Underrepresentation in Senior Executive Service

2015

The federal government acknowledges minority underrepresentation in the Senior Executive Service (SES) level position is a persistent problem. Why do policymakers adopt certain solutions and initiatives to address this problem? Federal agencies copy the private sector's best practices to legitimize the solutions and initiatives such as mentoring, succession planning, and diversity initiatives, further legitimizing themselves solutions to address this problem until 1993 when deliberate inclusion was eliminated with by removing these initiatives and requirements. Using content analysis, my primary data were 14 documents from a 17-year period, 1994-2011. I assessed how often solutions or initiatives were selected by policymakers to determine prevalence. I suggest, in search of legitimacy, initiatives are selected outside their initial context and these solutions and initiatives have shifting justifications with convergence across time. Findings in this study indicate the most prevalent solution or initiative is workforce and succession planning strategies. The justification most often used was not best practices as I suggested but Representative Bureaucracy, which was contextually relevant in addressing SES. There was pattern of shifting justifications when selecting solutions and initiatives but no pattern of convergence across time. One interesting finding in this study was the prevalence of seven out of 16 solutions and initiatives were recommended by a cross-section of policymakers over a 17-year period, which may suggests mimetic influences are without contextually relevant solutions.

MINORITIES IN SENIOR LEADERSHIP Reframing the Conversation

Although a 2019 New American Economy report found that 45% of Fortune 500 companies were founded by immigrants or by their children, and many major corporations are currently led my BIPOC CEOs (including Google, Microsoft and Walgreens), the barriers that minorities and

Utilizing Gender Diversity Initiatives at U.S. State Level Agencies

This exploratory research empirically examines the impact of the utilization of diversity organizational practices on the career progression of women to executive positions in state-level government organizations in the United States. The design includes an online survey instrument sent to a purposive sample of 600 female administrative agency executives in 50 states. A standard OLS regression model tested the predictive power of diversity utilization practice variables on the dependent variable, career progression of women to upper level management. As hypothesized, women who utilized diversity initiatives offered by their organizations decreased the amount of time it took them to achieve executive-level status (B =-.243, p = .065). It is suggested that in order to guarantee that women, and particularly minority women, participate in the effective managing of public organizations – regulations, laws, procedures and policies must be advanced through utilization.

A Twenty-First-Century Reception for Diversity in the Public Sector: A Case Study

Public Administration Review, 2000

In the past decade, most large public-sector organizations have adopted a philosophy of valuing workforce diversity and have implemented a variety of initiatives for effectively utilizing and managing the current and projected workforce diversity. However, whether organizational members subscribe to the diversity value or support the employer-sponsored diversity-management initiatives still largely remains unanswered. This article discusses the influence of employee race/ethnicity and gender identity, associated stereotyping and prejudice, and the nature of interpersonal relations on acceptance of diversity and support for diversity-management initiatives. The hypothesis that these three variables have a significant influence on receptivity to diversity in the workplace was empirically tested in a case study of diversity-management practices of a federal agency, and the study findings are reported in this article.

Institutionalizing Diversity Agendas: Presidents’ Councils for Diversity as Mechanisms for Strategic Change

Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 2018

Researchers examined the potential of Presidents' Councils on Diversity (PCDs) to position advancing diversity and inclusion agendas at 11 higher education institutions. Researchers investigated strategies and the degree that PCDs set up agendas through the mobilization (i.e., creating vision and setting priorities), implementation (i.e., creating systems to support change), and institutionalization (i.e., embedding initiatives in the culture and practices of the institution) phases as outlined by Kezar's Phased Leadership Strategies for Institutionalizing Diversity Agendas. Colleges and universities almost ubiquitously espouse the values of diversity, inclusion, and social justice in their mission statements, strategic plans, and websites

Race, Respect, and Red Tape: Inside the Black Box of Racially Representative Bureaucracies

Racially representative bureaucracy theory suggests that black and Latino clients of street-level bureaucracies will uniformly experience the benefits of a racially diverse staff within these institutions and perceive it as working to their advantage. Conversely, street-level bureaucracy theory suggests that racial minorities working within these organizations are under massive constraints that significantly hamstring their efforts to exercise discretion in ways that might benefit minority clients. Using in-depth interviews of both recipients and providers of public cash benefits and food stamps, I find that the majority of black and Latina clients interviewed in a racially diverse welfare office do not view staff members who share their racial status as operating in ways that are distinctly informed by racial group commonality. A strong bureaucratic structure creates institutional boundaries that often restrict meaningful engagement between these groups despite social group commonality. In those instances in which black and Latina clients do have a racialized interpretation of their encounters with bureaucrats from their racial groups, they are not monolithically understood. Clients can read them as either pointed but welcomed interventions by racemates who offer wisdom on how to navigate the welfare system or heavy-handed maneuvers by more privileged members of their racial communities. Ultimately, this article argues that racial diversity among the workforces of street-level bureaucracies is important and can have positive effects on organizational dynamics as racially representative bureaucracy theory suggests, but organizational context and intragroup politics within minority communities greatly inform how race is mediated within these institutions.

A Conceptual Content Analysis of 75 Years of Diversity Research in Public Administration

Diversity is an important facet of public administration, thus it is important to take stock and examine how the discipline has evolved in response to questions of representative democracy, social equity, and diversity. This article assesses the state-of-the-field by addressing the following question: How has research on diversity in the field of public administration progressed over time? Specifically, we seek to examine how the focus of diversity has transformed over time and the way the field has responded to half a century of legislation and policies aimed at both promoting equality and embracing difference. We utilize a conceptual content analysis approach to examine articles published on diversity in seven key public administration journals since 1940. The implications of this study are of great importance given that diversity in the workplace is a central issue for modern public management.

Advancing social justice and racial equity in the public sector

Journal of Public Affairs Education, 2018

This article argues that the integration of race-conscious dialogues in public administration programs will promote racial and social justice, as well as improve service delivery for a wide array of constituents. Scholars have acknowledged the challenges associated with incorporating racial justice into public sector practices. However, if racial divisions are to subside, academic and professional training programs need to purposefully include discussions of race, racism, and racial equity. This article concludes with a discussion of way to incorporate an antiracist pedagogy in public administration curriculum. This strategy can begin preparing future administrators to thoughtfully engage in difficult dialogues around topics of race and racism.

Central District Office Leadership for Diversity and Equity: Constraints and Opportunities for Policy Intermediaries

Journal of School Leadership, 2017

This article reports the findings of a multiyear investigation of school district central office directors of diversity and equity in Minnesota, who play an important role in school desegregation/integration policy implementation. Ethnographic and survey data were collected to examine a range of leadership activities and perspectives in communities across the state that received state funding for integration programming. In this article, I present findings that illustrate the role of integration leaders as boundary-spanning policy intermediaries who navigate competing frames of meaning about the purpose and value of diversity in learning environments. Learning from these school district leaders’ focus on educational equity in the context of changing demographics offers opportunities to address local community needs more directly.