ARCHAEOLOGICAL CULTURES AND CULTURAL AFFILIATION: HOPI AND ZUNI PERSPECTIVES IN THE AMERICAN SOUTHWEST (original) (raw)
Related papers
Archaeologies-journal of The World Archaeological Congress, 2007
In discussions concerning American Indians/First Nations and the practice of archaeology in North America, the issues are typically presented in a polarized fashion with American Indians/First Nations on one side and archaeologists on the other. Frequently the literature discusses how archaeologists should modify their practice in response to the needs of American Indian communities. Very little of the literature looks at the roles and challenges faced by American Indians who choose to pursue archaeology. This paper addresses this latter issue by examining my own work among First Nations communities in Ontario, Canada. Through the lens of ‘lived experience’, I will examine the interplay of identity, personal and communal histories, and the contemporary situation of my self and the First Nations communities I worked with, looking at how having ‘insider’ knowledge can be both useful and a handicap in fieldwork. Dans les discussions concernant les Amérindiens/Premières nations et la pratique de l’archéologie en Amérique du Nord, les questions sont typiquement présentées comme polarisant les Amérindiens/Premières nations d’un côté et les archéologues de l’autre. Fréquemment la littérature débat sur la question de connaître comment les archéologues pourraient modifier leur pratique pour mieux répondre aux communautés amérindiennes. La littérature regarde très peu les rôles et défis rencontrés par les archéologues amérindiens qui ont décidé de pratiquer l’archéologie. Cet article traite de cette question particulière en présentant mon propre travail parmi les communautés des premières nations de l’Ontario, au Canada. Par le biais d’une expérience vécue, je vais considérer l’effet de l’identité personnelle liée aux histoires communautaires, ma propre situation ainsi que celle des communautés des Premières nations, avec lesquelles je travaille, tout en examinant aussi comment la connaissance de l’intérieur peut être à la fois utile et handicapante sur le terrain. En discusiones acerca de los Indígenas Norteamericanos/Primeras Naciones y la práctica de la arqueología en Norteamérica, las cuestiones se presentan generalmente de una manera polarizada con los Indígenas Norteamericanos/Primeras Naciones por un lado y los arqueólogos por el otro. Con frecuencia la literatura discute cómo los arqueólogos deberían modificar su práctica en respuesta a las necesidades de las comunidades Indígenas Norteamericanas. Muy poco de esta literatura tiene en cuenta los roles y los desafíos que enfrentan los Indígenas Norteamericanos que eligen seguir arqueología. Este artículo trata esta última cuestión examinando mi propio trabajo entre las comunidades de los pueblos originarios en Ontario, Canadá. A través de la óptica de la “experiencia vivida”, examinaré el inter juego de la identidad, las historias personales y de la comunidad, y la situación contemporánea de mi yo y las comunidades de las Naciones Originarias con las que estuve trabajando, teniendo en cuenta de que manera el conocimiento desde “adentro” puede ser útil y a la vez una desventaja en el trabajo de campo.
Bulletin of the History of Archaeology, 1998
Finally, several of the papers present excellent statements of purpose with respect to the theoretical assump tions behind the research. Exp�cation of hegomonic discourse by Beaudry �. is well �veloped and articulated as is Henry!s discussion of consumer• behavior within the context of group decision making. Hamilton's development of the significance of food and the role that rank played in access to preferred resources is illuminating. Taken as a whole this collection of papers illustrates many of the points made in the first two chapters of the volume. They demonstrate a diversity of the uses and orientations researchers take toward historical source material. The archaeology of capitalism is often apparent as a defining para digm. Attempts to identify interest groups, ethnicity, classes, and subcultures on the basis of the archaeo, logical record is problematized in many of the papers. In several cases, processual methodology is alive and well in the employ of historical archaeologists asking significant social questions that utilize a middle range approach. Finally, issues of scale are addressed repeatedly in research that seeks solutions to difficulties with appropriate units of analysis. Little's assertion that historical archaeology is, and has been its own discipline, is supported by this volume.
2015. Reflections about Contemporary Ethnoarchaeology
This article discusses some of the central topics in ethnoarchaeology and approaches them from a Latin American perspective. The development of the subdiscipline is summarized and analyzed, and case studies in the region are provided. Moreover, since ethnoarchaeology in Latin America cannot be detached from the stateof the discipline in the rest of the world, there are references to global developments that aim to contextualize thesecase studies. Some of the criticisms made against the subdiscipline are included as well, and they are discussed in the light of the current situation. Ethnoarchaeology’s contributions to the interpretation of the archaeological record and to theory building in archaeology are examined. It is concluded that one of the main contributions of ethnoarchaeology is the mitigation of the ethnocentrism that permeates the archaeological view of the people in the past and the interpretation of long-term human processes. With its particular look upon contemporary societies, ethnoarchaeology is making a great input, not only to the understanding of human behavior ,but also to archaeological theory.
Laboratory of Anthropology note, 1982
Archaeological surveying Historical archaeology Land settlement patterns Beaubien and Miranda Land Grant Maxwell Land Grant Maxwell, Lucien Bonaparte Cites and towns Ghost towns Mines and mineral resources Mines and mining corporations Mines and mining companies Coal mines and mining Kaiser Steel Corporation National Iron and Metal Company New Mexico Sales Company Phelps Dodge Mining Corporation Raton Coal and Coke Company Railroads Railway companies Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe Railway Company El Paso and Southwestern Railway Company Maxwell Land Grant and Railway Company New Mexico and Pacific Railway Company Phelps Dodge Dawson Railway Company St. Louis, Rocky Mountain and Pacific Railway Company Santa Fe Railroad Company Southern Pacific Railway Company Historic period 20th century LA 35458 Colfax County (N.M.) Colfax (N.M.) Cimarron (N.M.) Dawson (N.M.) French (N.M.) Raton (N.M.) Vermejo (N.M.) Vermejo Junction (N.M.) LA 35458
Bridging the Gaps: Integrating Archaeology and History in Oaxaca, Mexico; A Volume in Memory of Bruce E. Byland, 2015
A major problem has been to bridge the gap between the peoples who are identified by Spanish and Indian documentary records and those who are known to us only through the ruins of their buildings and the broken elements of their material culture which have survived.-Vaillant 1937:324 The would-be correlator faces the problem of a genuine "gap" between the emphasis in the native traditions on political and dynastic history and the sequent modifications in artifact form which are the chief concern of the excavator. .. The problem is to bridge this gap, to tie the two kinds of history together at key points, to integrate the two sets of data in a meaningful synthesis.-Nicholson 1955:596 Los avances que se han hecho y los que están por hacerse, descansan en la confluencia conciente y coordinadora de dos disciplinas. .. esta recreación del acercamiento antropológico unificado, que llena la brecha entre disciplinas, es la ola del futuro. En la medida en que nuestras tareas estén coordinadas, en esa medida podremos aprender.-Byland and Pohl 1990:385-386 sCoPe and definitions