Efficacy and safety of a nicotine mouth spray for smoking cessation; a randomized, multicenter, controlled study in a naturalistic setting (original) (raw)
Related papers
A double-blind randomized trial of nicotine nasal spray as an aid in smoking cessation
European Respiratory Journal, 1997
The objective of the study was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of nicotine nasal solution (NNS) for smoking cessation from the stopping day up to 3 months. We also followed the participants for 2 yrs after ceasing smoking to assess what happens after stopping using NNS. In a placebo-controlled, double-blind, 2 yr prospective study, 157 smokers were given either NNS, one dose containing 1 mg of nicotine per 100 µL (n=79), or placebo (n=78). Treatment was continued for up to 1 yr. One day after quitting smoking, the average number of daily doses was 11 in the group assigned NNS and 14 in the group assigned the placebo, and after 6 weeks, 14 and 6 doses, respectively, among abstinent participants still using spray. After 3 months, 65% of the abstainers in the nicotine group were still using the NNS. The abstinence rates were 51, 39 and 29% after 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months, respectively, as compared to 24, 19 and 18% in the placebo group (p=0.0003; p=0.003; p=0.050). The proportion abstinent at the 1 yr (25 vs 17%) and 2 yr follow-ups (19 vs 14%) was higher among those assigned to the nicotine than to the placebo group, but not significantly so for the numbers used in the study. In conclusion, the use of nicotine nasal spray significantly increased the abstinence rate during the first 6 months following the quitting day.
Effects of nicotine mouth spray on urges to smoke, a randomised clinical trial
BMJ open, 2012
A new nicotine mouth spray was shown to be an effective stop-smoking treatment. This study was set up to examine the speed with which it relieves urges to smoke, and how it compares with nicotine lozenge in this respect. Randomised, cross-over trial that compared nicotine mouth spray 2 mg versus nicotine lozenge 2 or 4 mg. Clinical pharmacology research unit. 200 Volunteer smokers who smoked their first cigarette of the day within 30 min of waking. Subjects abstained from smoking the night before the morning they attended the laboratory. Treatment was administered following 5 h of witnessed abstinence. Urge to smoke was rated before and at 1, 3, 5, 10, 15, 25, 30, 45 min and 1, 1.5, and 2 h after treatment administration. The primary outcome concerned change during the first 1, 3 and 5 min after treatment administration. Nicotine mouth spray achieved greater reductions in craving than either lozenge during the first 1, 3 and 5 min postadministration. After using mouth spray, half of...
Randomised controlled trial of nasal nicotine spray in smoking cessation
The Lancet, 1992
Studies with nicotine chewing gum and nicotine skin patches indicate that nicotine replacement can help people to give up smoking. The rapidity with which nicotine is absorbed when given as a nasal spray suggests that it might be effective for those for whom the other means of replacement are too slow.
Addiction, 2011
Of six established nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) formulations, only the gum and patch have been tested without specialist clinic support in placebo-controlled trials. We aimed to broaden the evidence base by examining if the nicotine nasal spray (NNS) could be effective with only brief support in general practice. Design Randomized placebo-controlled trial. Setting Twenty-seven English general practices. Participants A total of 761 heavy smokers received brief support and 12 weeks of treatment with NNS (506) or placebo (255). Measurements The primary outcome was biochemically verified complete abstinence from smoking throughout weeks 3-12. Findings NNS compared with placebo more than doubled the number who successfully stopped smoking [15.4% versus 6.7%, odds ratio (OR) = 2.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.5-4.4]. Many participants reported minor irritant adverse symptoms. NNS was particularly effective among those who were more highly dependent on nicotine (OR = 6.17, 95% CI = 2.13-17.9). Of those who failed to stop during the first week (417, 54.8%), only one (0.2%) achieved later success. Conclusions NNS is effective when given in primary care. The benefit was lower than in a specialist clinic but similar to that with the nicotine patch in primary care. Unlike most other NRT formulations, bupropion or varenicline, NNS was especially helpful for more dependent smokers. Continuing treatment of those initially failing was not beneficial. An initial 1-week prescription to those more dependent on nicotine is likely to be the most cost-effective NNS treatment protocol. These results should offer support to the effectiveness of the other NRT formulations untested in this setting.
Addiction, 2010
To determine effects on craving, user satisfaction, and consumption patterns of two new nicotine replacement therapies (NRT) used for eight hours after overnight tobacco abstinence. Design In a within-subject, cross-over trial participants were randomly assigned Zonnic® nicotine mouth spray (1 mg/spray), Zonnic® nicotine lozenge (2.5 mg), Nicorette® gum (4 mg) and placebo lozenge on each of four study days. Setting University research unit. Participants Forty-seven dependent adult smokers. Measurements Participants rated their urges to smoke, irritability, concentration and restlessness before and during the first hour of product use on a 100-point scale. A subsample of 11 participants provided blood samples for nicotine analysis. Findings All active products reduced craving significantly more than placebo (mean reductions of 28.6, 25.8, 24.7 and 8.9 points for mouth spray, gum, lozenge and placebo). Mouth spray relieved craving faster than placebo and gum with significant reductions within five minutes of use (mean differences of -14.5 (95% CI: -23.0 to -6.0) and -10.6 (95% CI: -19.1 to -2.1) with placebo and gum respectively. Mouth spray produced a faster time to maximum plasma nicotine concentration (14.5 minutes, 95% CI: 8.0 to 21.0) compared to the lozenge (30.3 minutes, 95% CI: 21.1 to 39.5) and gum (45.8 minutes, 95% CI: 36.2 to 55.4). Maximum concentrations of blood nicotine were higher with mouth spray (10.0 ng/ml) and lozenge (10.8 ng/ ml) compared to gum (7.8 ng/ml). Both lozenge and mouth spray were well tolerated. Conclusions The mouth spray and lozenge are at least as effective as 4 mg nicotine gum in relieving craving suggesting that they are likely to be effective in aiding smoking cessation. The mouth spray may be particularly useful for acute craving relief.
Subjective effects of an initial dose of nicotine nasal spray predict treatment outcome
Psychopharmacology, 2004
Rationale: Nicotine nasal spray (NS) is recommended as one of five first-line smoking cessation products. A clinically convenient tool to identify smokers most likely to benefit from NS could assist healthcare practitioners in selecting the optimal treatment for individual patients. Objectives: To evaluate whether the subjective effects of an initial pre-treatment dose of NS predict 6 month abstinence rates following NS treatment for tobacco dependence. Methods: One hundred and seventy-five smokers received an initial 1 mg pretreatment dose of NS and completed a new measure of NS subjective effects (initial spray experience, ISE). This measure, together with demographic and smoking history variables, was examined as a predictor of 6-month pointprevalence (biochemically verified) abstinence rates. Results: Factor analysis revealed positive and negative effects subscales of the ISE. Smokers with higher ratings of positive effects from the pre-treatment NS dose were significantly more likely to be abstinent at 6-month follow-up. These effects were partially mediated by reduction in urge to smoke. Conclusions: Pending additional validation in human laboratory and clinical studies, assessment of the acute positive subjective effects of initial NS delivery may be an efficient way to predict who will be successful with NS treatment for tobacco dependence.
Use of a liquid nicotine delivery product to promote smoking cessation
BMC Public Health, 2010
Background: Despite access to various pharmacotherapies and counseling support to aid cessation, smokers typically demonstrate quit rates below 50%. This report describes the results of a Phase 2a study exploring the efficacy of a liquid nicotine delivery system as an aid to smoking cessation assessed after 12 weeks of therapy. Methods: A single-arm Phase 2a study was conducted. Community-based smokers (ages 18+ years, smoking at least 10 cigarettes daily for the past year and interested in making a quit attempt) were recruited and completed clinic visits at 2 week intervals over the 12 week study period where carbon monoxide levels were assessed and the Smoke-Break product was rated on taste and overall satisfaction. Participants were provided with a supply of liquid nicotine cigarettes (e.g., Smoke-Break) at each clinic visit. A total of 69 smokers were enrolled and received the intervention product (intention to treat group, ITT) and 52 smokers verified participation (according to protocol group, ATP). Results: The cessation rate at 12 weeks after the baseline visit, assessed as the bioverified point prevalence of abstinence, was 71.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 58.8%-83.5%) in the ATP group and 53.6% (41.8%-65.4%) in the ITT group. Participants rated the liquid nicotine delivery system highly and also expressed general satisfaction. Few adverse events were identified with no serious adverse events. Conclusions: These results support the efficacy of the liquid nicotine delivery system in smoking cessation. If this nicotine delivery product proves to be effective in larger trials, it could represent an inexpensive, readily accessible and well-tolerated agent to promote smoking cessation. Trial Registration: This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov as study NCT00715871.
BMJ, 1999
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of using a nicotine patch for 5 months with a nicotine nasal spray for 1 year. Design Placebo controlled, double blind trial. Setting Reykjavik health centre. Subjects 237 smokers aged 22-66 years living in or around Reykjavik. Interventions Nicotine patch for 5 months with nicotine nasal spray for 1 year (n = 118) or nicotine patch with placebo spray (n = 119). Treatment with patches included 15 mg of nicotine for 3 months, 10 mg for the fourth month, and 5 mg for the fifth month, whereas nicotine in the nasal spray was available for up to 1 year. Both groups received supportive treatment. Main outcome measure Sustained abstinence from smoking. Results The log rank test for 6 years (2 = 8.5, P = 0.004) shows a significant association between abstinence from smoking and type of treatment. Sustained abstinence rates for the patch and nasal spray group and patch only group were 51% v 35% after 6 weeks (P = 0.011 (2), 95% confidence interval 1.17% to 3.32%), 37% v 25% after 3 months (P = 0.045, 1.01% to 3.08%), 31% v 16% after 6 months (P = 0.005, 1.27% to 4.50%), 27% v 11% after 12 months (P = 0.001, 1.50% to 6.14%), and 16% v 9% after 6 years (P = 0.077, 0.93% to 4.72%). Conclusions Short and long term abstinence rates show that the combination of using a nicotine patch for 5 months with a nicotine nasal spray for 1 year is a more effective method of stopping smoking than using a patch only. The low percentage of participants using the nasal spray at 1 year, and the few relapses during the second year, suggest that it is not cost effective to use a nasal spray for longer than 7 months after stopping a patch.
Nasal Nicotine Solution as an Aid to Cigarette Withdrawal: a pilot clinical trial
Addiction, 1987
were invited to use NNS for at least the first 11 days of their cessation attempt. Results indicated that NNS alleviated withdrawal and may be helpful in achieving cigarette cessation. Short and long term success rates were 65% and 35% respectively. Side effects were not a serious problem. Nicotine intake from NNS was low on average, but in some subjects who became long term users was similar to that from cigarettes. NNS merits further study, but its full potential can only be assessed by a placebo-controlled trial.
Nasal spray nicotine replacement suppresses cigarette smoking desire and behavior
Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 1992
The effects of short-term nasal spray nicotine replacement in suppressing desire to smoke and ad libitum cigarette smoking behavior were evaluated in male and female smokers. In study I, 10 male and 10 female smokers received intermittent doses of 0, 7.5, 15, and 30 micrograms/kg nicotine by way of measured-dose nasal spray, with each dose on a separate day. Self-reported desire to smoke was significantly suppressed by each nicotine dose compared with placebo, but there were no significant differences among nicotine doses or between men and women. In study II, eight male and eight female smokers received 0, 15, and 30 micrograms/kg nicotine intermittently and were allowed to smoke their preferred brands of cigarettes ad libitum. Similar to study I, nicotine replacement significantly suppressed number of cigarettes smoked, number of puffs, and carbon monoxide boost and increased latency to smoking, but there were almost no significant differences between the two nicotine doses. Magni...