Convicted Drunk Drivers in an Electronic Monitoring Program: A Preliminary Study (original) (raw)

Convicted Drunk Drivers in an Electronic Monitoring Program: An Exploratory Study

2007

In the United States, electronic monitoring home detention programs were officially started in Palm Beach County, Florida, in 1984. Researchers have been assessing these programs since late 1980s. However, little attention has been paid to the impact of these programs on convicted drunk drivers. This study focuses on drunk drivers sentenced to electronic monitoring home detention program in a southwestern Indiana county from January 2002 to December 2003. Specifically, the objective of this study is to examine the characteristics of program participants and their exit status.

Convicted Drunk Drivers in Electronic Monitoring Home Detention and Day Reporting Center : A Comparison

2007

In Vigo County, Indiana (USA), convicted drunk drivers are sentenced to Electronically Monitored Home Detention (EMHD) and day Reporting Program (DRC) programs. Previous researchers did not conduct a comparative study on these offenders placed in the two programs in the same jurisdiction. This study focuses on those convicted drunk drivers who were placed in the two programs in Vigo County, and completed their sentences from January 2002 through December 2003. Afterwards, the successful participants were followed through the end of June 2004 for recidivism reports. Discriminant analyses were used to determine whether there was any difference between the two groups of similar offenders in terms of "exit status" and "post-program recidivism" during the study period. The data analyses demonstrated that participation in DRC program was more effective than EMHD in terms of exit status and post-program recidivism.

Convicted drunk drivers in a day reporting center program

2005

This study examines a drunk driving population sentenced to a Day Reporting Center in a southwestern Indiana county from January 2002 through December 2003. Specifically, using cross-tabulations and chi-square analyses, this study concentrates on the exit status and post-program recidivism' among those participants._ The results of this study suggest that placing convicted drink drivers in a Day Reporting Center program may be a viable and effective alternative to imprisonment.

Does Electronic Monitoring Home Detention Program Work? Evaluating Program Suitability Based on Offenders' Post-Program Recidivism Status

2014

The main purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of Electronic Monitoring Home Detention (EMHD) program on post-program recidivism status of those who have participated in the program. The second objective of this study is to determine what factors best predict post-EMHD program recidivism. A binary logistic regression analysis was performed on a fourteen-variable model attempting to predict post-program recidivism status for the subjects who have been sentenced in the EMHD program. The analyses of the data in this study are based on a total of 293 subjects. A significant, yet interesting finding that emerged from this study is that EMHD program, measured as the “exit status” (successful completion vs. unsuccessful) had no effect on reducing postprogram recidivism for the subjects that participated in the program. The data show that the odds of one recidivating after their release were two times higher for those who had successfully completed the EMHD program compared to ...

Typologies of Drivers Convicted of Driving under the Influence of Alcohol as Predictors of Alcohol Ignition Interlock Performance

Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 2020

Background-Alcohol ignition interlock devices (IIDs) reduce rates of drinking and driving when installed on the vehicles of offenders. While the IID is installed on their vehicle, some drivers adapt their drinking behaviors, while others cannot. Heavy alcohol use and mental health concerns reduce treatment adherence in clinical settings, but it has not yet known how they pertain to behavioral adaptation to IIDs. Objectives-This study focuses on identifying driver typologies as predictors of performance while on alcohol IIDs. Methods-The study utilizes the Managing Heavy Drinking study of drivers in New York state. Participants (N = 101; 59 males, 42 females) completed questionnaires assessing demographic information, drinking behaviors, driving history and mental health measures. All participants had been convicted of a DUI, and installed an IID. Latent class analysis was used to establish typologies and predict lockout ratios. Results-Four typologies emerged and drivers with elevations in mental health concerns had significantly worse lockout ratios than those in other classes. Conclusions-The current study may provide support for interventions designed to identify drivers with comorbid mental health concerns and tailor appropriate interventions to administer while the IID is installed with the aim of improving behavioral adaptation to the device.

Controlling Impaired Driving Through Vehicle Programs: An Overview

Traffic Injury Prevention, 2004

The growing recognition of the problem presented by illicit vehicle operation by those whose license has been suspended for driving while intoxicated (DWI) has led to the increasing use of vehicle sanctions. These sanctions include vehicle impoundment and forfeiture, vehicle registration cancellation, and vehicle interlocks as penalties for DWI and driving while suspended (DWS). This article reviews the current information available on the use and effectiveness of vehicle sanctions for reducing offender recidivism. In the United States, 14 states have impoundment laws that are widely used as sanctions for both DWI and DWS, with the length of the impoundment increasing with the number of previous offenses. These laws have been shown to reduce recidivism while the vehicle is in custody and, to a lesser extent, even after the vehicle has been released. Vehicle impoundment is also widely used in Canada and New Zealand. Although a larger number of U.S. states have laws providing for vehicle forfeiture for DWI or DWS, this sanction tends to be limited to multiple offenders and therefore impacts fewer drivers. Cancellation of the vehicle registration and the confiscation of the vehicle plates are increasing in popularity because the vehicle tags are the property of the state, rather than the vehicle owner. Vehicle alcohol interlocks have proven to be an effective method for reducing DWI offender recidivism while they are on the car, but appear to produce only limited post-treatment behavior change. Interlocks are widely used in the United States and Canada and are beginning to be implemented in Europe and Australia. The issues that arise in implementing vehicle sanction programs are discussed and the actions taken by states to deal with them are described.

Penalizing recidivist drunk drivers in Indiana: Impediments to implementation

Accident Analysis & Prevention, 1987

In 1983, Indiana enacted a law mandating that anyone convicted a second or subsequent time of Operating While Intoxicated (OWl) receive a minimum of 48 consecutive hours in jail or 10 days of community service. A representative random sample of Indiana counties was used to determine the extent of implementation of this law by the courts in 1984 and 1985. Analysis of the 1984 data concluded that nearly 70% of the cases did comply with the law in its first year of implementation. However, 13.8% of the recidivists received neither jail nor community service. Another /7.6% served some jail time and/or community service, but not of a sufficient length to comply with the law. Overall compliance increased to 75% in 1985, while the proportion who received neither jail nor community service increased to 17%. Several specific causes for noncompliance are identified and recommendations for their correction are offered. It is felt that the Indiana experience described in this paper will prove instructive to other states with newly-strengthened OWl laws.