International Protection of Minority Rights (original) (raw)
2006, International Studies
The twentieth century began, well after the First World War, to focus on the rights of minorities and their linkages with general peace and welfare. The record of the League of Nations, however, was not very encouraging. This is perhaps why, in the post-Second World War period, the international community adopted a more cautious approach to minority rights than before. This is manifested in the reluctance to agree on a definition of minorities, and also a clear preference for perceiving minority rights as being inseparable from human rights. The growing body of international legal instruments for the protection of human rights has, nevertheless, a discernible bearing on minority rights. The international covenants on human rights best exemplify this. Further, the monitoring mechanisms of the UN have also contributed to minority rights through progressive interpretations and rulings. Alongside, regional initiatives, as in Europe, have also helped the cause of minority rights after the end of the Cold War. Shortcomings in the international protection of minority rights are due to the apprehensions of state actors. They fear the abuse of the right to self-determination and the rights of indigenous peoples-as part of minority/human rights-will endanger the existing socio-political order.
Sign up for access to the world's latest research.
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Related papers
An Analytical Study of International Standards on Minority Rights
IJMER
The recognition and protection of minority rights under international law began with the establishment of the League of Nations which adopted several “minority treaties”. When the United Nations was set up in 1945 to replace the League of Nations, it too, gradually developed a number of norms, procedures and mechanisms with an aim to protect minorities. Apart from UN various international statutes and standards have provided the broad framework for the protection and promotion of these minorities. This article is an endeavor by the author to ascertain the meaning of the term „Minority‟ as enshrined in different international statutes. Author has also made an attempt to analyze the scope of minority rights at the international forum. Article also consist analysis of various international statutes providing array of rights to the minorities with help of relevant case laws.
From the point of international law regulations the problem of minority is a complex, diversified problem with an unsystematized law, imprecise standard of protection, and what is more, with an unclear subjective range. Difficulties resulting from the last issue are a result first of all of a fact that the notion of national minority is still undefined. The notion of national minority is diverse. In doctrine the trials of defining this notion were undertaken many times, always with unsatisfying results. The first definitional trials appeared in the XIXth century. They resulted from the fact that the feeling of national identity in this period began to shape. 1
Absract Th is article explores the role of judicial discourse in articulating and accommodating minority claims under international law. It identifi es four major movements in the fi eld of minority protection and argues that, while the era of specialised standard-setting on minority groups seems to be largely over, international jurisprudence holds the promise of a wider and deeper (re-)assessment of minority issues within the human rights canon.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.