Changing our eating habits by playing the cultural trump card (original) (raw)

This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material. EDITORIAL Changing our eating habits by playing the cultural trump card Jan Boersema and Andrew Blowers One of the most tragic developments in our modern world is that, in one way or another, food has become problematic across the board. From the beginning of time people have wrestled with the question whether there was enough to eat, and that is, sadly, still the case in many parts of the world. But now that production isfortunately-adequate in many regions, we are witnessing the emergence of another problem: too much food and the wrong kind of food. Overindulgence is threatening the health of hordes of well-off human beings and unsustainable production processes are constantly adding to the burden on the natural environment. This development is tragic for two reasons. First, because, on paper, the problem seems soluble. The Earth can easily feed the seven billion people who live on it in a responsible and just manner-even eight or nine million under the right conditions (Butler 2010; Foley et al. 2011). The second reason is related to the fact that we have managed to turn one of the most quintessential and positive elements of human existence into a major problem. Philosophers have been telling us for centuries that we are, in a sense, what we eat. And they are right. Food is the link between us and nature, and what we consume transforms us materially into what we are. But this matter is not separable from spirit. Food is not separable from conscience. Food is also culture, and our view of the world has implications for what and how we eat. We are in danger of losing this broad, cultural and philosophical view of food. This editorial is, on the one hand, a plea to look at the problems realistically, give them a name, and look for solutions; and, on the other, a rallying cry to take things forward and drill down to the cultural and philosophical core. If we are to change the way we feed ourselves we need to do both, we must think and act inclusively. If we stop short at thinking, we will merely get bogged down in technocratic quasi-solutions which will not be sustainable in the long run. So at the end of this editorial the focus tends to be more and more on the moral issues affecting the west-mainly Europe-and what might be done about them. We must reconnect our food, and everything that goes with it, with our vision of life, with our beliefs about the quality of existence and the well-being of humans and other living organisms. Modern problems Shortages The global problems surrounding food can be encapsulated in three terms: shortages, surpluses and wrong. At face value, the first problem, food shortages, seems to be primarily a question of distribution. For decades enough food has been produced worldwide to sustain every living soul on the planet. In fact, the increase in