Greed among American Lawyers (original) (raw)
Related papers
Price of Law: How the Market for Lawyers Distorts the Justice System, The
1999
Bill Clinton's legal bills in connection with the Lewinsky scandal topped 10million;2thebillforKenStarr′sinvestigationofthePresidentexceeded10 million; 2 the bill for Ken Starr's investigation of the President exceeded 10million;2thebillforKenStarr′sinvestigationofthePresidentexceeded50 million? The cost to the eight families portrayed in the bestseller A Civil Action for their tort suit against a manufacturing company accused of dumping hazardous chemicals into the water supply was 4.8million(paidfromasettlementofabout4.8 million (paid from a settlement of about 4.8million(paidfromasettlementofabout8 million); the cost for the defense exceeded $7 million.
In her latest book on the subject, Deborah L. Rhode provides those interested in the legal profession with a valuable synthesis of the many consequences of lawyers' monopoly on the practice of law. Rhode demonstrates that there are far-reaching implications for those seeking legal remedy, prospective and current law students, innovation in the field, as well as for the institutions and individuals within the profession itself. On the whole, THE TROUBLE WITH LAWYERS delivers a well-researched set of criticisms about the profession. Although Rhode provides some brief comparisons between the American system and innovations abroad, the book is largely a vehicle for proposals for future research and practical reforms.
How and Why Do Lawyers Misbehave?
Lawyers and the Possibility of Justice, 2009
for their helpful comments. I am grateful to David Chambers for data and analysis of ethical conduct from surveys of Michigan law graduates.
Slippery Slope from Ambition to Greed to Dishonesty: Lawyers, Money, and Professional Integrity, The
Hofstra L. Rev., 2001
Law Center. I am grateful to Jessica Kendall for her excellent work as a research assistant and to the law schools of Catholic University and Hofstra University for their support for this work. 1. See Edward N. Wolff, How the Pie is Sliced: America's Growing Concentration of Wealth, AM. PROSPECT (June 23, 1995), at http:llwww.americanprospect.com/printV6122/wolffe.html (last visited Mar. 19, 2002). 2. See id. If one measures increasing concentration of wealth by financial wealth rather than by marketable wealth (the latter presumably including non-money assets), the wealthiest 1% of Americans owns 47% of the wealth, and the wealthiest 20% of the population owns 91%. See
The Slippery Slope from Ambition to Greed to Dishonesty: Lawyers, Money, and Professional Integrity
Hofstra Law Review, 2002
Law Center. I am grateful to Jessica Kendall for her excellent work as a research assistant and to the law schools of Catholic University and Hofstra University for their support for this work. 1. See Edward N. Wolff, How the Pie is Sliced: America's Growing Concentration of Wealth, AM. PROSPECT (June 23, 1995), at http:llwww.americanprospect.com/printV6122/wolffe.html (last visited Mar. 19, 2002). 2. See id. If one measures increasing concentration of wealth by financial wealth rather than by marketable wealth (the latter presumably including non-money assets), the wealthiest 1% of Americans owns 47% of the wealth, and the wealthiest 20% of the population owns 91%. See
How Some Lawyers Prioritise Earnings and Not Necessarily the Best Interests of Their Clients
2021
This case deals with an employee seeking justice in a labour dispute and who ends up paying a small fortune in legal fees and still fails to find satisfaction. The case provides food for thought for human resource practitioners and particularly lawyers regarding under the circumstances when they should be ethically bound to advise disgruntled employees to cease pursuing a grievance that has little prospect of success. How and when should the human resource practitioner provide professional and independent advice, and when should the ethical (sic) lawyer refuse to approach the courts with a case containing insufficient merit?
Indiana Law Journal, 2015
truth. 2 Never before has the national security community been so influenced by, and controlled by, an increasingly complex national-security legal system. 3 In many ways this is a good trend, but it, like a pendulum, can swing too far. This Article attempts to assess the current situation and evaluate whether we have swung too far into "overlawyering." 4 At the center of this tension is the national-security lawyer. 5 These professionals are charged with helping decision makers-the "client" 6-navigate the above-mentioned complexities of "war fighting." 7 More specifically, 2. THE OXFORD DICTIONARY OF QUOTATIONS 151 (Oxford Univ. Press ed., 3d ed. 1980). America's self-perception, indeed the perception of much of the world, is that we are the ones who follow the rules; even when following rules is difficult, we have tried to wear the "white hat." 3.