From T(h)e(le)ology to Evolution: The Typological Legacy and the Darwinian Possibility of Economic Theorizing (original) (raw)
2013, Journal of Economic Issues
The characterization of neoclassical economics as a "taxonomic science" and the understanding of the evolutionary possibilities of economic theorizing are central aspects of Thorstein Veblen's institutional thought. This paper seeks to provide elements for a contemporary resumption of such Veblenian elaborations. Thus, we aim to re-establish the dialogue between economics and biology, focusing on the historical and methodological spheres of the conversation. The first part of the paper demonstrates that evolutionary biology's analysis of the pre-Darwinian past relies on the same principles that Veblen used to build his criticism of neoclassical economics-namely, the principles of typology. The paper also shows how this approach had a negative impact on the theoretical elaborations of pre-Darwinian biology, and how it contributed to the problematic foundations of neoclassical economics. The paper further focuses on the key methodological principles of Charles Darwin's works, highlighting their importance beyond the field of biology, and pointing out that a Darwinian approach constitutes an ontological perspective, premised on what Geoffrey Hodgson and Thorbjørn Knudsen denote as "generalized Darwinism." Finally, the paper discusses certain concepts in the general theoretical debate of Darwinian ontology to stress the revolutionary role of Charles Darwin as a founder of this perspective and to explore the relationship between the ontological perspective and biological analogy.
Related papers
The characterization of neoclassical economics as a "taxonomic science" and the understanding of the evolutionary possibilities of economic theorizing are central aspects of Thorstein Veblen's institutional thought. This paper seeks to provide elements for a contemporary resumption of such Veblenian elaborations. Thus, we aim to re-establish the dialogue between economics and biology, focusing on the historical and methodological spheres of the conversation. The first part of the paper demonstrates that evolutionary biology's analysis of the pre-Darwinian past relies on the same principles that Veblen used to build his criticism of neoclassical economics -namely, the principles of typology. The paper also shows how this approach had a negative impact on the theoretical elaborations of pre-Darwinian biology, and how it contributed to the problematic foundations of neoclassical economics. The paper further focuses on the key methodological principles of Charles Darwin's works, highlighting their importance beyond the field of biology, and pointing out that a Darwinian approach constitutes an ontological perspective, premised on what Geoffrey Hodgson and Thorbjørn Knudsen denote as "generalized Darwinism." Finally, the paper discusses certain concepts in the general theoretical debate of Darwinian ontology to stress the revolutionary role of Charles Darwin as a founder of this perspective and to explore the relationship between the ontological perspective and biological analogy.
A debate on the ontological foundations of evolutionary economics
2000
published special issues on the topic, and the search for ontological foundations continues. This search signals a renewed interest in grounding evolutionary economics in an ontology that: (1) acknowledges our biological origins; (2) is realistic about the nature of human behavior; and (3) is capable of addressing the dynamics of economic change. In the debates that this search has triggered, evolutionary economics not only re-examines its own Darwinian and Schumpeterian origins, but also begins to link up with a range of other behaviorally oriented disciplines both within and outside economics. The resulting theoretical progress can arguably be seen as a third wave of theory development in evolutionary economics. If Nelson and Winter's 'An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change' is the landmark of a second wave of theory development in which the Darwinian themes embraced by Veblen were linked to a Schumpeterian view on technological change, the current debates can be interpreted as an effort to move beyond the legacy of Nelson and Winter by reexamining the philosophical foundations of the term 'evolutionary' in evolutionary economics.
Evolutionary economics and the competition between scientific paradigms
Globalization and Business
The choice of physics as a model for the development of economic theory, a methodological direction which has been particularly dominant since the Second World War, has increasingly been criticized by economists, and not only by evolutionary economists, but by members of a variety of schools. Many of these critics see biology as an alternative methodological direction that merits investigation. Modelling economics on biology is not a new idea; it is an attempt to revisit a number of questions which were left behind at the turn of the twentiieth century. Thus the fundamental ques- tion is whether the concept of evolutionary economics was abandoned prematurely, or for good reasons. At present, it seems that the unifying position of these different “evolutionists” seems to be a growing contempt with the neoclassical economics, especially to its simplifying assumptions, which take inventions, innovations and dissem- ination of information as external variables The concepts that schumpet...
2017
our inquiry considers the origins of Evolutionary Economics by reintroducing a debate that took place in Russia in the 19th and early 20th century. Responses to Charles Darwin’s The origin of Species are considered, especially critiques stressing Darwin’s emphasis upon competition and struggle in natural selection, that can be traced directly to Thomas Robert Malthus. Considering challenging contributions made by several Russian scholars, we place special emphasis upon Peter Kropotkin’s focus on cooperation and “mutual aid” in natural selection and evolution. We then speculate upon the commonality found in the evolutionary views advanced by Kropotkin and his American contemporary, Thorstein Veblen. KEYWoRDS: Charles Darwin; Evolutionary Economics; mutual aid; Peter Kropotkin; Thomas Robert Malthus; Thorstein Veblen. JEL Classification: B1; B2; B3. * Professor of Economics and International Studies; Portland State University; oregon, USA. E-mail: hallj@pdx.edu; Head of the Sub-Divisi...
Evolutionary Processes and History of Economics
2003
Abstract This papers addresses the evolutionary characteristics of social processes from a perspective of the history of economics. The case of Alchian's (1950) paper on'Uncertainty and Evolution'and the ensuing debate is used to illustrate how actors' perception influenced developments in economics science. The evolutionary character of such a conception is discussed.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.