Effect of Peripheral Defocus on Axial Eye Growth and Modulation of Refractive Error in Hyperopes: Protocol for a Nonrandomized Clinical Trial (original) (raw)

Effect of peripheral defocus on axial eye growth and modulation of refractive error in hyperopes

2018

Background: Hyperopia occurs due to insufficient ocular growth and a failure to emmetropize in childhood. In anisohyperopia, it is unclear why one eye may remain hyperopic while the fellow eye grows toward an emmetropic state. Animal studies have shown that manipulating peripheral defocus through optical means while simultaneously providing correct axial focus can either discourage or encourage axial eye growth to effectively treat myopia or hyperopia, respectively. Myopia progression and axial eye growth can be significantly reduced in children and adolescents through the use of multifocal contact lenses. These contact lenses correct distance central myopia while simultaneously imposing relative peripheral myopic defocus. The effect of correcting distance central hyperopia while simultaneously imposing relative peripheral hyperopic defocus is yet to be elucidated in humans. Objective: The objective of our study is to understand the natural progression of axial eye growth and refractive error in hyperopes and anisohyperopes and to establish whether axial eye growth and refractive error can be modified using multifocal contact lenses in hyperopes and anisohyperopes. Methods: There are 3 elements to the program of research. First, the natural progression of axial eye growth and refractive error will be measured in spectacle-wearing hyperopic and anisohyperopic subjects aged between 5 and <20 years. In other words, the natural growth of the eye will be followed without any intervention. Second, as a paired-eye control study, anisohyperopes aged between 8 and <16 years will be fitted with a center-near multifocal design contact lens in their more hyperopic eye and a single-vision contact lens in the fellow eye if required. The progression of axial eye growth and refractive error will be measured and compared. Third, subjects aged between 8 and <16 years with similar levels of hyperopia in each eye will be fitted with center-near multifocal design contact lenses in each eye; the progression of axial eye growth and refractive error in these subjects will be measured and compared with those of subjects in the natural progression study.

Axial eye growth and refractive error development can be modified by exposing the peripheral retina to relative myopic or hyperopic defocus

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2014

Bifocal contact lenses were used to impose hyperopic and myopic defocus on the peripheral retina of marmosets. Eye growth and refractive state were compared with untreated animals and those treated with single-vision or multizone contact lenses from earlier studies. Thirty juvenile marmosets wore one of three experimental annular bifocal contact lens designs on their right eyes and a plano contact lens on the left eye as a control for 10 weeks from 70 days of age (10 marmosets/group). The experimental designs had plano center zones (1.5 or 3 mm) and +5 diopters [D] or -5 D in the periphery (referred to as +5 D/1.5 mm, +5 D/3 mm and -5 D/3 mm). We measured the central and peripheral mean spherical refractive error (MSE), vitreous chamber depth (VC), pupil diameter (PD), calculated eye growth, and myopia progression rates prior to and during treatment. The results were compared with age-matched untreated (N=25), single-vision positive (N=19), negative (N=16), and +5/-5 D multizone len...

Orthokeratology With a New Contact Lens Design in Hyperopia

Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice, 2019

To evaluate the preliminary clinical outcomes of a new contact lens design for orthokeratology in hyperopia. Methods: Prospective pilot study including 8 hyperopic eyes of 4 nonpresbyopic patients (24-44 years) undergoing orthokeratology with the Alexa H contact lens (Tiedra Pharmaceutical, Madrid, Spain), which is an aspheric pentacurve design. Visual, refractive, corneal topographic, and aberrometric changes were evaluated during a 1-month follow-up. Likewise, the presence of ocular surface alterations was evaluated by slitlamp biomicroscopy during this follow-up. Results: Mean noncyclopegic sphere decreased significantly from a mean prefitting value of 2.9460.95 D to mean values of 1.1861.19 (P¼0.01) and 0.2560.85 D (P¼0.04) at 1 week and 1 month of lens wear, respectively. Statistically significant changes were detected at 1 week of use of the lenses in keratometry (P¼0.03), asphericity (Q) (P¼0.01), and the Zernike term for corneal spherical aberration (SA) (P¼0.01). However, no significant changes were observed in uncorrected (P¼0.68) and best-corrected distance visual acuity (P¼0.18). Superficial corneal staining was observed after the first night of use in only 1 patient who was resolved spontaneously. Likewise, the induction of a "toroid-like" topographic pattern leading to poor visual outcome and suboptimal correction was observed in four eyes at the beginning of the treatment. This condition was solved in all cases by reducing the lens diameter. Conclusion: The Alexa H lens seems to be useful for providing an orthokeratologic correction of hyperopia, with generation of increased negative Q and SA, and central steepening. However, fitting guides must be improved to avoid suboptimal outcomes as those related to the "toroid-like" topographic pattern defined.

A Clinical Study of the Impact of Soft Contact Lenses on the Progression of Myopia in Young Patients

Clinical Ophthalmology

To assess the impact of soft contact lenses on the progression of myopia in young patients. Patients and Methods: The observational study included 102 patients divided into 3 groups: MFCL (multifocal contact lenses) group: 15 girls and 9 boys, aged 8-20 (� x= 14.12 ± 2.863) with soft multifocal contact lenses with myopia: � x = −3.12 D ± 1.776 D and mean myopia progression −0.23 ± 0.233D after 2 years; SVCL (single vision contact lenses) group: 30 girls and 5 boys, 11-20 years old (� x=15.5 ± 2.24) with myopia � x = −2.88 ± 2.122 D at admission and mean myopia progression −0.54 ± 0.464 D after 2 years; the spectacle (single vision glasses) group: 25 girls and 18 boys, aged 8-18 years (� x = 13.65 ± 2.448) with single vision glasses with myopia: � x = −1.74 ± 1.412 D at admission and mean myopia progression −0.86 ± 0.489D after 2 years. Medical history and physical examination were performed every 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. Refractive error was examined using the autorefractometry after cycloplegia. Results: The analysis of myopia correction after 2 years showed differences between MFCL and spectacle correction. The change in myopia progression after 2 years was statistically significant for MFCL vs SVCL and MFCL vs spectacle correction when the myopia occured before the period of intensive growth. When myopia occurred during the period of intensive growth, difference was noted for MFCL vs spectacle correction and SVCL vs spectacle correction. When myopia occurred after a period of intensive growth, no significant differences between the groups were observed. Conclusion: 1) Multifocal contact lenses and some single vision contact lenses (Biofinity) may be useful in the control of myopia in younger patients, slowing the progression of nearsightedness; therefore, they can be a therapeutic option in inhibiting the progression of myopia. 2) The best effects of using multifocal contact lenses occur if myopia is diagnosed before the period of intensive growth.

Inverting peripheral hyperopic defocus into myopic defocus among myopic schoolchildren using addition power of multifocal contact lens

Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology, 2020

PURPOSE: The purpose was to determine the minimum near-addition power needed using Proclear ® multifocal D-Design contact lens (adds: +1.50 D, +2.50 D, +3.00 D, and +3.50 D) to invert the pattern of relative hyperopic defocus in the peripheral retina into relative myopic defocus among the eyes of myopic schoolchildren. METHODS: Twenty-seven right eyes (24 females and 3 males) of 27 myopic schoolchildren aged between 13 and 15 years were included in this study. The measurements of central refraction, peripheral refraction (between 35º temporal and 35º nasal visual field in 5º steps), and lag of accommodation were conducted using the Grand-Seiko WR-5100K open-field autorefractometer initially without correction (WC), followed by with correction using four different addition powers of Proclear ® multifocal D-Design contact lens in random sequence. Axial length was measured using a handheld probe ultrasound A-scan (Tomey AL-2000). RESULTS: The relative peripheral refractive error showed high hyperopic defocus of +1.08 ± 1.24 D at 35º nasal and +1.06 ± 1.06 D at 35º temporal visual field WC. All Proclear multifocal contact lenses (MFCLs) decreased the peripheral hyperopic defocus with increasing addition powers (F [2.938, 47.001] = 13.317, P < 0.001). However, only +3.00 D addition and +3.50 D addition (P = 0.001) could invert the peripheral hyperopic defocus into peripheral myopic defocus. Apart from that, the +3.00 D addition lens showed the lowest lag of accommodation (+1.10 ± 0.83 D) among the other MFCL adds (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: A +3.00 D addition Proclear MFCL is the optimal addition power that can invert the pattern of peripheral hyperopic defocus into myopic defocus.

Comparison of Ocular Component Growth Curves among Refractive Error Groups in Children

Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2005

PURPOSE. To compare ocular component growth curves among four refractive error groups in children. METHODS Cycloplegic refractive error was categorized into four groups: persistent emmetropia between Ϫ0.25 and ϩ1.00 D (exclusive) in both the vertical and horizontal meridians on all study visits (n ϭ 194); myopia of at least Ϫ0.75 D in both meridians on at least one visit (n ϭ 247); persistent hyperopia of at least ϩ1.00 D in both meridians on all visits (n ϭ 43); and emmetropizing hyperopia of at least ϩ1.00 D in both meridians on at least the first but not at all visits (n ϭ 253). Subjects were seen for three visits or more between the ages of 6 and 14 years. Growth curves were modeled for the persistent emmetropes to describe the relation between age and the ocular components and were applied to the other three refractive error groups to determine significant differences. RESULTS At baseline, eyes of myopes and persistent emmetropes differed in vitreous chamber depth, anterior chamber depth, axial length, and corneal power and produced growth curves that showed differences in the same ocular components. Persistent hyperopes were significantly different from persistent emmetropes in most components at baseline, whereas growth curve shapes were not significantly different, with the exception of anterior chamber depth (slower growth in persistent hyperopes compared with emmetropes) and axial length (lesser annual growth per year in persistent hyperopes compared with emmetropes). The growth curve shape for corneal power was different between the emmetropizing hyperopes and persistent emmetropes (increasing corneal power compared with decreasing power in emmetropes). CONCLUSIONS Comparisons of growth curves between persistent emmetropes and three other refractive error groups showed that there are many similarities in the growth patterns for both the emmetropizing and persistent hyperopes, whereas the differences in growth lie mainly between the emmetropes and myopes.

Limited Change in Anisometropia and Aniso-Axial Length Over 13 Years in Myopic Children Enrolled in the Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial

Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2014

PURPOSE. We investigated changes in anisometropia and aniso-axial length with myopia progression in the Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial (COMET) cohort. METHODS. Of 469 myopic children, 6 to <12 years old, enrolled in COMET, 358 were followed for 13 years. Cycloplegic autorefraction and axial length (AL) in each eye were measured annually. The COMET eligibility required anisometropia (interocular difference in spherical equivalent refraction) of 1.00 diopter (D). For each child, a linear regression line was fit to anisometropia data by visit, and the regression slope b was used as the rate of change. Logistic regression was applied to identify factors for significant changes in anisometropia (b ‡ 0.05 D/y, or a cumulative increase in anisometropia ‡0.50 D over 10 years). Similar analyses were applied to aniso-AL. RESULTS. A total of 358/469 (76.3%) children had refractions at baseline and the 13-year visit. The mean (SD) amount of anisometropia increased from 0.24 D (0.22 D) at baseline to 0.49 D (0.46 D) at the 13-year visit. A total of 319/358 (89.1%) had slopes jbj < 0.05 D/y and 39 (10.9%) had slopes jbj ‡ 0.05 D/y, with only one negative slope. Similarly, 334/358 (93.3%) children had little change in aniso-AL over time. The correlation between changes in anisometropia and aniso-AL over 13 years was 0.39 (P < 0.001). The correlation between changes in anisometropia and myopia progression was significant (r ¼ À0.36, P < 0.001). No correlation was found between baseline anisometropia and myopia progression (r ¼ À0.02, P ¼ 0.68). CONCLUSIONS. Myopia and axial length progressed at a similar rate in both eyes for most children in COMET during the period of fast progression and eventual stabilization. These results may be more generalizable to school-aged myopic children with limited anisometropia at baseline. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00000113.

Contact lenses in the management of high anisometropic amblyopia

Eye, 2002

Purpose Anisometropia of more than one dioptre during the sensitive visual period may cause amblyopia. Its management requires refractive correction, and occlusion. Compliance with treatment is critical if visual improvement is to obtained. High anisometropia, poor initial acuity and mixed strabismic/anisometropia amblyopia are predictive factors for a poor outcome. We evaluated contact lens use in the management of high anisometropic amblyopia. Methods Retrospective analysis of anisometropic amblyopia managed in a paediatric contact lens clinic (July 1996-July 2000), after standard amblyopia therapy of spectacles and occlusion therapy had been tried. Presenting age, acuity and refraction, duration of lens wear and occlusion, and final visual outcomes were noted. Results Seven children (four male, three female) presented at age 3.5-6 years (mean 4.5). Six had myopic anisometropia 6.0-18.4 dioptres (mean 10.4 dioptres) and one 6.75 dioptres hypermetropic anisometropia. The initial corrected acuities of the amblyopic eyes were 6/18 to 1/60. Five patients used contact lenses with a range from 5 months to 4 years. Final acuities were 6/12-1/60. Two myopes with 6 dioptres anisometropia improved three to four Snellen lines, one with 8.8 dioptres improved one line. Three with Ͼ10 dioptres anisometropia did not improve. The hypermetropic patient improved part of one Snellen line. Conclusions High anisometropic amblyopia is challenging to treat. In our study contact lenses improved visual acuity in myopic anisometropia of up to 9 dioptres.

Prevention of myopia by partial correction of hyperopia: a twins study

International ophthalmology, 2017

To confirm the prediction of emmetropization feedback theory that myopia can be prevented by correcting the hyperopia of a child at risk of becoming myopic. We conducted such myopia prevention treatment with twins at risk. Their hyperopia was partially corrected by one half at age 7 and in subsequent years until age 16. Hyperopia progressively decreased in all eyes as expected. None of the twins developed myopia. The spherical equivalent refractions of the followed eyes were +1 and +1.25 D at age 16. Feedback theory accurately predicted these values. The treatment of the twins with partial correction of their hyperopia was successful. Prevention of myopia with this technique is relatively simple and powerful. The use of this myopia prevention treatment has no adverse effects. This prevention treatment is indicated in children with a hyperopic reserve at risk of developing myopia.

Multifocal Orthokeratology versus Conventional Orthokeratology for Myopia Control: A Paired-Eye Study

Journal of Clinical Medicine

We conducted a prospective, paired-eye, investigator masked study in 30 children with myopia (−1.25 D to −4.00 D; age 10 to 14 years) to test the efficacy of a novel multifocal orthokeratology (MOK) lens compared to conventional orthokeratology (OK) in slowing axial eye growth. The MOK lens molded a center-distance, multifocal surface onto the anterior cornea, with a concentric treatment zone power of +2.50 D. Children wore an MOK lens in one eye and a conventional OK lens in the fellow eye nightly for 18 months. Eye growth was monitored with non-contact ocular biometry. Over 18 months, MOK-treated eyes showed significantly less axial expansion than OK-treated eyes (axial length change: MOK 0.173 mm less than OK; p < 0.01), and inner axial length (posterior cornea to anterior sclera change: MOK 0.156 mm less than OK, p < 0.01). The reduced elongation was constant across different baseline progression rates (range −0.50 D/year to −2.00 D/year). Visual acuity was less in MOK vs....